Community

Top 5 Career Hall of Fame – Gameweek 32 Review

The experience of the majority of our  Top Five Career Hall of Fame (HoF) shows that cream really does rise to the top, as three of this elite group attained season best FPL ranks in Gameweek 33.

Peter Kouwenberg (aka MyPrettyPony) broke into the top 1,000 for the first time this season and is now on course for a hat-trick of three-digit finishes in consecutive seasons, with his current 846 overall ranking.

Career HoF number four Steve Poulsom continued his recovery in what has been a below par campaign, and now sits at 80,354 overall. Meanwhile, Career HoF number five David Meechan moved up to 2,433. A seventh top 10,000 finish in seven seasons now looks firmly on the cards for David.

The only red arrow this week belonged to FPL Legend Ville Ronka as he slipped back marginally following a season high rank of 8,637 in Gameweek 29.

This article focuses on the moves and strategies employed by the five elite managers who grace the upper echelons of this site’s Career Hall of Fame. Members can see the latest top five via our Live Hall of Fame update.

To help out I have also deployed Fusen’s FPL Statistico tool to gain an extra insight into their thinking.

Before we look at their teams in more detail, here’s why they are the best FPL managers:

Lowest rank in the last three seasons for any of the top five4,324
Highest rank in the last three seasons for any of the top five49

POINTS & RANK

ManagerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavid
GW32 points6773937392
In the bank

(Saturday)

£0.1£0.5£0.0£2.5£0.4

Peter’s bold move to sell Arsenal’s Alexis Sanchez for Chelsea’s Eden Hazard paid off. His front seven all delivered attacking returns helping him to a Gameweek 32 score of 93. That makes three Gameweek ranks in the top 50,000 in the past month.

Impressive as Peter’s run is, he’s pipped to the top of the form table by David who has three top 50,000 gameweek ranks in four. David continues to benefit from the Wildcard he played in Gameweek 30. This week he boosted his score with new signings; in-form Palace winger Wilfried Zaha and fellow popular pick for Double Gameweek 34 – Manchester United’s Zlatan Ibrahimovic.

Name & HoF rankFPL IDPoint after GW32FPL rank GW32Best FPL rank 16/17*Worst FPL rank 16/17*
Ville #1303271,81715,3478,637 (GW29)135,324 (GW19)
Marlen #2600811,77447,56513,561 (GW20)101,648 (GW27)
Peter #367461,903846846 (GW32)243,702 (GW07)
Steve #439111,75180,35480,354 (GW32)845,911 (GW17)
David #5457551,8752,4332,433 (GW32)73,858 (GW09)

*from GW6 onwards
Only David of this quintet qualified for the cup and he went out in Gameweek 19. Marlen and David have played their Wildcards, all apart from David have played their Triple Captain chip, and three have also played their AOA chip.

The graph below shows the ranks of the Top Five managers over the first 32 Gameweeks. The vertical scale is from rank 1 to 1M. The distance between the ranks corresponds to the amount of points separating them. For instance there are 201pts between rank 1 and rank 10,000, and 263pts between 10,000 and 1M. The graph gives an idea of how difficult it is to move up the ranks as you near the summit.

HoF points rank graphic GW32

 

CAPTAIN

Three of the Top Five HoF managers plumped for Tottenham’s Dele Alli. They were rewarded with a goal and clean sheet against The Hornets. However Ville and Marlen Rattiner did slightly better with their captain picks; Everton’s Romelu Lukaku producing yet another double digit haul at home, with Ibrahimovic doing likewise in the Red Devil’s victory over Sunderland.

captain HOF graphic_GW32

Over the season Sanchez has been picked as captain 30% of the time, averaging 14.4pts when chosen. Manchester City’s Sergio Aguero follows in popularity having been handed the armband 24% of the time, averaging 15.9pts as captain or triple captain, with Lukaku chosen 11% of the time averaging a mighty 21.9pts.

In the graphic below I’ve displayed this information for the five most popular captain picks.

It shows that Lukaku has handsomely returned the faith placed in him when chosen as captain. You could argue that the trolls in this graphic are Tottenham’s Harry Kane and United’s Ibrahimovic. They have not performed as well as expected on the few occasions that they have been trusted with the armband, averaging 11.4 and 13.2 points respectively.

With Kane vs Lukaku leading the captain poll for Gameweek 33, it is worth remembering what happened in Gameweek 24. Both players had attractive fixtures as Spurs hosted Middlesbrough while Everton entertained Bournemouth, and it was the big Belgian who came out on top. He delivered his highest points tally of the season to eclipse his English counterpart. Will recent history repeat itself or will Kane take his revenge? 

CAPTAIN POINTS

ManagerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavidAve. (c) pointsAs % of score
GW (c) Points26241616162026
Total (c) Points46345349940942645025

Peter remains the best performing manager out of the Top Five in his ability to pick the right captain. Though Ville made ground on him this week thanks to Lukaku.

To make Sanchez owners feel better; I mentioned in the Gameweek 30 review how well then FPL leader Knut Hebæk had done with his captain picks – Knut has amassed an impressive 572 points – well last week the high-flying Norwegian captained Sanchez. Just goes to show you can’t get it right all the time.

TRANSFERS – Gameweek 32

ManagerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavid
Players InSigurdssonEriksenAguero, HazardEriksenIbrahimovic, Zaha
Players OutSnodgrassCoutinhoCosta, SanchezManéVardy, Sigurdsson

TRANSFER SUCCESS

ManagerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavidAverage
GW32 Transfers112121
GW32 Points Hits004001
GW32 Immediate Points Gained from Transfers-4-296165
Minus Points Hits-4-256164

Sod’s law for Ville; the seemingly sensible transfer of West Ham’s Robert Snodgrass to Swansea’s Gylfi Sigurdsson backfired as the Scott’s assist and clean sheet meant he outscored the Icelander. Similar disappointment for Marlen as Liverpool’s Philippe Coutinho came off the bench to better his new signing Tottenham’s Christian Eriksen.

The most successful moves this week belonged to David. He added Marlen’s Gameweek 31 Wildcard picks Wilfried Zaha and Ibrahimovic to his team. In picking Zaha both David and Marlen are going for form over fixtures. Perhaps anticipating an end of season run from Palace to match the great escapes of Leicester, Sunderland, and Wigan in recent years. Big Sam has never been relegated from the Premier League.

NameVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavidAverage
Total Transfers323952464242
Total Points Hits84088645250
Total Immediate Points Gained from Transfers167240319285256253
Minus Points Hits159200231221204203
Total Benched Points281148245230169215
£ Value (GW32)104.0103.5108.2106.1105.0105.4

Over the course of the season Peter has mustered more immediate transfer points than any of his fellow bosses at the HoF’s top table.

Ville has faltered a little recently with his new signings not immediately out performing his cast-offs. At the moment Ville’s low number of transfers leaves him on average 55 points behind his less hit-averse colleagues in terms of immediate points gained minus hits. Although with his Wildcard still to play he will likely make up ground before the season draws to a close.

Immediate transfer success is not in itself proof of overall success but simply one part of a complex picture. Steve for instance is only 10 points behind Peter in this metric, however he is over 150 points behind overall.

One of the aims in FPL is to own players for their best periods and sell them when they are underperforming. With that in mind I’ve put together a couple of tables looking at how our managers have fared with getting the best out of their charges.

EXPENSIVE AND MID PRICED PLAYER RETURNS

*average points per appearance for each player (number of gameweeks)

PlayerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavid
Sanchez10.5 (24gw)9.5 (25gw)10.6 (19gw)11.1 (12gw)9.9 (28gw)
Aguero11.2 (13gw)9.0 (20gw)12.0 (13gw)11.2 (13gw)9.9 (15gw)
Lukaku10.4 (18gw)8.2 (16gw)10.8 (17gw)11.1 (17gw)10.0 (10gw)
Ibrahimovic5.6 (11gw)8.1 (18gw)6.1 (14gw)5.0 (14gw)7.2 (12gw)
Kane8.4 (14gw)9.3 (06gw)7.6 (05gw)7.6 (05gw)7.0 (04gw)
Costa4.1 (09gw)4.8 (08gw)6.1 (14gw)6.9 (07gw)5.3 (03gw)
Hazard2.0 (02gw)5.2 (10gw)5.5 (11gw)5.8 (05gw)5.1 (10gw)
Coutinho1.0 (01gw)5.3 (04gw)5.4 (07gw)5.5 (04gw)4.5 (11gw)
Firmino4.5 (10gw)5.6 (14gw)4.9 (12gw)5.0 (27gw)5.7 (10gw)
Eriksen5.6 (16gw)6.3 (07gw)5.7 (14gw)6.0 (01gw)7.4 (17gw)
Alli6.0 (08gw)7.0 (08gw)7.6 (07gw)7.9 (09gw)
Sigurdsson4.0 (08gw)4.3 (07gw)4.5 (11gw)4.0 (08gw)4.3 (14gw)
Alonso5.2 (16gw)2.0 (02gw)5.8 (20gw)5.2 (20gw)5.7 (24gw)

I’ve highlighted both the best and worst performing averages for each player. A few observations:

  • Peter has no players in which he has their lowest points average out of the five managers. Demonstrating that he has generally known when is the right time to sell premium assets and invest funds elsewhere.
  • Ville’s tendency to hold onto players is reflected in that he has a number of poorly performing premium players. Though only two he has owned for 10 gameweeks or more.
  • Marlen has shown too much faith in Sanchez, Aguero and Lukaku, not maximising his use of these players. The pricey trio have not delivered for him compared to the other five managers.
  • Steve is the anomaly. Currently the lowest ranked elite manager he has made the best use of five players. Though the longest serving player in his team, Liverpool’s Roberto Firmino, has delivered a relatively disappointing five points per appearance over the 27 gameweeks Steve has owned him.

Players with low points returns over 10+matches

*defenders with 4 points or less per appearance, midfielders and forwards with 5 points or less per appearance

VilleMarlenPeterSteveDavid
Allen – 2.5Lovren – 3.7Brunt – 3.6Mee – 3.6Evans – 3.1
Snodgrass – 2.8Sigurdsson – 4.5McAuley – 4.0Lovren – 3.2
Williams – 3.6Firmino – 4.9Firmino – 5.0Sigurdsson – 4.3
Benteke – 3.7Ibrahimovic – 5.0Coutinho – 4.5
McAuley – 3.9
Firmino – 4.5

Ville has six players who have underperformed for him over a period of ten matches or more. Again not surprising given the patient way he plays the game.

With both of these tables you might expect Ville to be the worst performing manager and yet he is not. In fact he only recently dropped outside the top 10,000. Clearly there is more to success than can be measured with these stats. 

FORMATION

ManagerVilleMarlenPeterSteveDavid
GW Formation3-4-33-4-33-5-23-5-23-5-2
Season Formation3-4-33-4-33-4-33-4-33-5-2
No. of Times Chosen2326191417
Ave. Points Scored58.35759.552.164.3

The standard 3-4-3 was again popular this week with three managers choosing this formation. Midfielder Coutinho replaced injured forward Andy Carroll in Peter’s line-up, meaning he ended the week with a 3-5-2 formation.

Over the season Ville and Marlen have been strong advocates of 3-4-3, Marlen opting for the formation 26 times. Yet it is David, favouring 3-5-2, who has scored the highest average points with 64.3. It has also been the most successful formation for Peter, the seven times he has chosen or defaulted to 3-5-2 he has average 69 points.

However with the likes of Lukaku, Kane, Ibrahimovic and Aguero all performing well, coupled with Sanchez’s current malaise – will it continue to be the most rewarding formation?

This season 3-4-3 has been favoured 57% of the time by the career HoF Top Five, with 3-5-2 second with 23%. 4-4-2 is the third most popular on 11%.

PLAYERS – Gameweek 32

Players in 5 teamsEriksen, Valencia
Players in 4 teamsLukaku, Alli, Alonso
Players in 3 teamsSanchez, Heaton, Pickford
Attacking players under 6mBarnes x2, Zaha x2, King, Can, Fletcher

TEMPLATE – Gameweek 32

Goalkeepers – Heaton, Pickford

Defenders – Valencia, Alonso, Davies, (McAuley / Chambers)

Midfielders – Eriksen, Alli, Sanchez, Sigurdsson, Zaha

Forwards – Lukaku, Ibrahimovic, Vardy

Bournemouth’s Josh King has a rival in the sub 6.0 category in the shape of Palace’s Wilfried Zaha. Both players currently provide excellent value for their owners.

Spurs assets remain popular, and the dilemma facing all of us is what to do about the return of Harry Kane? Triple Spurs must be tempting for our Top Five managers.

Jamie Vardy to Harry Kane looks the sensible move with Leicester having one eye on the Champions League.

THE KEYS TO SUCCESS IN FANTASY FOOTBALL

I wonder how useful ‘Captain Points’ and ‘Immediate Transfer Points’ are as measures for gauging FPL success. There are managers such as The Rumour Mill who are performing better than most of the Top Five for these two metrics and yet find themselves with a comparatively low rank.

There must be other ways to analyse FPL performance.

The season isn’t over yet but so far it seems a high points scoring season. With six gameweeks to go including three double gameweeks, it’s not impossible that we will see a record winning score. The current marker is 2,668 points set in the 2009/2010 season.

With so many points on offer from a wide number of players an aggressive transfer approach is paying off for Peter. This is no doubt why he currently leads the way in Immediate Transfer Points.

Yet Peter tells us this is not the norm for him – in previous seasons he’s been much more cautious. However perhaps it is his ability to adapt to what this season has thrown up that truly marks him out; an ability to re-assess his options and assumptions from gameweek to gameweek.

For instance removing Sanchez after only one week. A premium asset and the leading FPL points scorer, this was a move many others baulked at. If getting Sanchez in the first place was an error of judgement (I would argue against that), it wasn’t one he was willing to prolong. Suddenly Aguero emerged as a premium alternative up front and funds were shifted to the Argentine.

The game is about making good decisions. We can devour stats, watch matches and highlights, and read analyses to inform ourselves, but there’s no magic formula. As Peter would say ‘trust your gut’. At the end of the day Peter’s gut is working better than most – I feel Yakult are missing a sponsorship opportunity here!

One of the helpful things to come out of these articles is Peter’s willingness to offer insights around transfers and strategy in the comment section below. Hopefully, he will once again be able to share his thoughts.

TopMarx Fan of Fantasy Football and Monty Python. "Archimedes out to Socrates, Socrates back to Archimedes, Archimedes out to Heraclitus, he beats Hegel. Heraclitus a little flick, here he comes on the far post, Socrates is there, Socrates heads it in! Socrates has scored! The Greeks are going mad, the Greeks are going mad! Socrates scores, got a beautiful cross from Archimedes. The Germans are disputing it. Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside. Follow them on Twitter

39 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Fitzy.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 15 days ago

    Top marks once again! 😉

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 15 days ago

      thanks

  2. The Rumour Mill
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 15 days ago

    Cheers for the mention TopMarx! 😀

    Of course since I mentioned my curious statistical outlier of a team, I have regressed to the mean lol. Captaining Sanchez over Vardy in GW31 was an error made due to fear, whereas ahead of GW32 I got caught up in the excitement of Kane returning and bought him in too early rather than the sensible move to welcome back Lukaku. That hurt me. Fortunately my differentials salvaged the gameweek from disaster somewhat - Sterling and Zaha getting me up to 68 (-4). I'm correcting my error and bringing in Lukaku this week though!

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 15 days ago

      Very sensible move! Lukaku is essential imho.

      You're still doing better than four managers for Captain Points and are above the average on Immediate Transfer Points Minus Hits.

      I'm trying to think of other ways to measure performance - let me know if you have an ideas... thanks!

      1. The Rumour Mill
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 15 days ago

        Haha glad you agree! Ah ok, hopefully that will continue to the end of the season then 🙂

        Hmm, I think quite an interesting one would be to have a look at autosub points, which would show the relative importance of having a deep squad, versus focusing on purely the first 11.

        I also think you're onto something with the high and mid price player points analysis section. One idea would be to have some sort of graph with gameweeks on the x axis, points on the y axis, tracking the HOF top 5's points from big hitters, for example. This would show quite clearly when and where each member made a good decision to jump on of off that premium player. If this could somehow be tied in to relative fixture difficulty that might be useful too. It might even be worth running again with mid price players too, to show the relative importance of big hitters versus mid price players. Hell of a lot of work though! 😛

        1. TopMarx
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 15 days ago

          Ha! I wish I hadn't asked now 😉 Thanks, I like your idea and glad you found the player analysis useful. Perhaps if I included actual points from big hitters as well, so it's easier to see when the Top Five have missed out and when they have nailed it. I'm still not sure any of this really helps us grasp how to make good FPL decisions... it simply shows when they've made good decisions. I think the playing style of each manager is interesting, though that too can be fluid. Perhaps an all day run is the key to making better FPL decisions...

          1. The Rumour Mill
            • 7 Years
            7 years, 14 days ago

            Hahaha, sorry, went a bit overboard! Yeah that sounds good. True, it may be possible to infer from that what works in the decision making though. I've jotted a few notes down through the season of things that have worked for me and what hasn't, I've used those as the season has gone on and will take it into next season too. Maybe that way I'll learn to eliminate mistakes like not bringing in Lukaku at home to Leicester... 😉

            1. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 14 days ago

              well I don't think it was a mistake bringing in Kane but may have been worth a hit to get Lukaku too. It seems to be the way to go this year! I'll have a go at putting a graph together, thank you

  3. My Pretty Pony
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 15 days ago

    Fantastic level of detail, TM and good luck with your Cup game, before I forget.

    I got lucky with Sanchez blank and with Cout coming in, but then that's where having a decent bench comes in useful.

    My dilemma this week is mainly to Kane or not Kane. I can either go for:

    A: Aguero to Kane and Davies to Gibson (-4).
    B: Aguero to Kane and Erik to Zaha (-4).
    C: Sit tight and do Aguero to Ibra next week (free), which would also mean I retain Lukaku vs West Ham (with options A and B he'll be out for Ibra).

    Kane in is, of course, massively tempting, but I fancy Davies and Erik to do well too and Aguero's stats are decent, so it's a toughie.

    Hopefully doing an all day run on Good Friday, so I'll have plenty of time to weigh up the options, which is normally where I go wrong!

    Anyway, the forthcoming WC is the more interesting point now 🙂

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 15 days ago

      All day run!?! That sounds fairly extreme. I enjoy exercise but wow, I think my legs would fall off if I attempted that!

      Anyway, thank you and good luck to you too in your cup game.

      I'm considering Ibra to Kane this week, which is possibly slightly mad because I would just get Ibra back next week! (for Aguero). Though as I would like to have King and even Coutinho back despite their lack of doubles, it would end up being a -8 in GW34... but who knows maybe Siggy will actually do something this week and I'll have a re-think.

      I didn't point out in the article that Lukaku's GW24 haul came against Bournemouth, maybe that's a reason for getting Kane and making him captain. I can't see Burnley shipping six goals.

      If you get Kane will you captain him or are you settled on Lukaku or someone else?

      Thank you and enjoy your run!

      1. My Pretty Pony
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 14 days ago

        Cheers, TM. It's still a big if as to whether I get Kane. Objectively, I think he'd need 10+ pts to justify, given the knock on effects, but he could easily do that. I think the logical thing to do is sit tight with what I've got, but you know I like my hits.

        Captaincy is another case of higher risk, higher reward if I had Kane. I'd have 3(+c) Spurs, probably all attacking, so a haul would be an amazing start to the weekend. A blank would obviously be disastrous, although I wouldn't be the only one in that boat. On balance, I suspect I'll stick with Lukaku but undecided.

        So plenty for me to think about whilst I'm plodding the miles!

        1. TopMarx
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 14 days ago

          I'm now wondering about Aguero having read YMA's article, Southampton seem to concede a fair few chances. It's a fair point about Kane, I'm half waiting to see how Ibra gets on this evening and what noises come out of OT before the deadline.

          Your stunning captain pick of Lukaku in GW24 against Bournemouth - what was is it that made you hand him the armband? - Lukaku's form? Bournemouth's defending? A combination? Something else entirely?

          You didn't own Kane or Lukaku in GW23 but decided to buy the Belgian over Kane for GW24. You had Alli and Eriksen so maybe that was why. Kane scored against Middlesbrough but Lukaku with four goals clearly won their head-to-head that week.

          1. My Pretty Pony
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 14 days ago

            Cheers, TM, I think a fair few of us skippered Lukaku that week and I'm guessing I didn't have whoever the other most popular pick(s) was/were. Although that reminds me what Spurs' opposition are capable of. Mmm - maybe that 10+pts is more than achievable!

            1. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 14 days ago

              Well I can tell you - in the top five 2 went for Alli, 1 for Kane and 1 for Aguero. So oddly enough not too disimilar to this week. i might look at some stats later to compare Bournemouth's form prior to gw24 and this gw, i wonder if they will be equally obliging. GW24 they would have recently lost Ake, maybe they have stablised a bit since then...

              1. RedLightning
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 13 Years
                7 years, 13 days ago

                I think the big factor in GW24 was that they were playing Everton, the League's best rabbit-bashers, not that they were missing Ake.

                In GW1-11, with Ake only making a couple of cameo appearances, Bournemouth conceded 16 goals in 11 matches, keeping 3 clean sheets and conceding 1 goal three times, 2 goals three times, 3 goals only once, and 4 goals once (against Man City).

                In GW12-20, with Ake playing 90 mins in 8 out of 9 matches (he was ineligible to play against Chelsea), they conceded 18 goals in 9 matches, keeping three clean sheets but conceding 3 goals in each of the other six. Ake scored 3 goals as well as keeping 3 clean sheets during this period, but Bournemouth still conceded 15 goals in his 8 matches.

                In GW21-32, after Ake left, they conceded 25 goals in 12 matches, keeping 2 clean sheets and conceding 1 goal once, 2 goals six times, 3 goals only twice, and 6 goals once (against Everton).

                So their defence was tightest in the first 12 games (1.3 goals conceded per game), but they conceded 2 goals per game in both GW12-20 and GW21-32.

                1. TopMarx
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 11 Years
                  7 years, 13 days ago

                  Thank you for all this info.

                  I wonder if the Everton bashing was a bit of a turning point for them? they lost the next match 2-0 to Man City but didn't lose again until Chelsea last week.

                  I'm trying to establish what the chances are of them getting hammered tomorrow, it's Kane vs Lukaku captain conundrum I'm struggling with!

                  1. RedLightning
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 13 Years
                    7 years, 13 days ago

                    Their away form does appear to be improving.
                    Last 3 away matches were 1-1 at MUN, 0-0 at SOU and 2-2 at LIV.

                    In their previous 13 away matches they had won 2, drawn 2 and lost 8, scoring 15 and conceding 30.
                    I suspect that their general strategy is to play fairly safe (especially in away matches) while the game is level, but to counter-attack strongly if they fall behind.

                    They didn't lose all the games in which they conceded 3 goals - they beat Liverpool 4-3 and drew 3-3 with Arsenal - but they conceded further goals against Everton and lost 3-6. In this match they were 0-3 down at half-time, fought back to make it 2-3 after 70 minutes, but then conceded 3 late goals to make the final score 3-6.

                    1. TopMarx
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 11 Years
                      7 years, 13 days ago

                      really interesting. I can see why you call Everton the league's best rabbit-bashers having also scored late goals against Hull recently. I looked into some stats comparing Spurs and Everton in terms of goals and shots in the box (SiB) from 60min to 90min:

                      spurs
                      G 23 SiB 98
                      everton
                      G 26 SiB 96

                      kane (per game)
                      G 0.2 SiB 0.5 (608min) total
                      G 0.3 SiB 0.8 (356min) home

                      lukaku (per game)
                      G 0.4 SiB 0.9 (905min) total
                      G 0.5 SiB 1.0 (426min) home

                      Spurs and Everton are fairly similar for Goals and SiB in the final 30min, so perhaps if Bournemouth fall behind Spurs, like Everton, could score a few.

                      Looking at Lukaku vs Kane, similar and both better at home, but Lukaku is more of a focal points for Everton than Kane is for Spurs.

                      Comparing Burnley to Bournemouth, Burnley have conceded more shots per game in away matches than the Cherries.

                      burnley
                      19.6 SpG

                      bournemouth
                      16.1 SpG

                      I'm edging towards captaining Lukaku, how about you?

                      1. RedLightning
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 13 Years
                        7 years, 13 days ago

                        Lukaku for me, with Alli or Eriksen as vice.

                        I don't own Kane, and I can't bring him in this game-week without taking a hit and also losing other important players, so he'll have to wait for my wildcard.

                        It would be a very close call between Lukaku and Kane if I did own both.

                      2. TopMarx
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 11 Years
                        7 years, 13 days ago

                        I can get Kane in a straight swap with Ibra, and then get Ibra back next week, most likely for Aguero. Part of me is tempted to save FT for DGW34 as I also own Alli and Eriksen. But it's so tempting to get Kane as it won't cost me points this week, and who knows what will have happened by next week?

            2. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 14 days ago

              I don't know if this is of interest, I looked at Bournemouth's form prior to GW24 and now. Also the impact of losing Ake.

              AKE’s LAST 3 MATCHES
              (excludes match v che in gw18)
              17 - 1-3 SOU
              19 - 3-0 swa
              20 - 3-3 ARS (Ake’s last match)

              BC 2 / SiB 23 / GC 6

              MATCHES BEFORE LOSING TO EVERTON
              21 - 3-1 hul
              22 - 2-2 WAT
              23 - 0-2 CPL

              BC 4 / SiB 19 / GC 7

              CURRENT FORM
              30 - 0-0 sou
              31 - 2-2 liv
              32 - 1-3 CHE

              BC 4 / SiB 30 / GC 5

              Having played Chelsea and Liverpool in their past two matches it's perhaps tricky to compare stats. Interesting that they recently drew 0-0 away to Southampton having previously lost 3-1 at home when Ake was still playing for them.

              They have conceded the same number of Big Chances in their last three as they did before Everton in GW24, but they have faced stronger opposition.

              Their stats for that Everton match in GW24

              BC 4 / SiB 12 / GC 6

              Will we see similar stats this weekend?

              1. TopMarx
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 11 Years
                7 years, 14 days ago

                *edit they lost 3-1 to hull in GW21 not beat them 3-1, so GC 7 is correct

  4. Gloria Kanchelskis
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 14 days ago

    A very good article that seems to improve every week. I enjoy the chance to learn from those who are consistently better at the game than me.

    The only part I'd question is the criteria for the poor performing players which I feel penalizes the effective price enablers - I prefer to look at average points per £m. Lovren, Williams and McAuley are all around or above 0.65 ppg/m which if maintained across the team would give average scores in the low to mid 60s per week after allowing for subs and the armband. What do you reckon?

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 14 days ago

      I think that's a fair point. One aim is to always find value in each price bracket, there is less pressure on value players to return big scores but when someone like King or Zaha hits form it makes a difference. I will have look at sub 6.0 players next week.

      I would also say that true price enablers like Amat this season for instance, or Ville's had Fletcher as his non-playing 5th mid, don't tend to play. The 4th mid or 3rd defender spot is interesting to look at. I think of the names you mention I was only surprised to see McAuley come up in the table. I thought he had been more effective but obviously not for all the matches he was in their teams. There have been better performing defenders for similar prices that the Top Five have picked. I will look at it next week.
      Thanks

  5. ANON.
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 14 days ago

    In terms of measures of gauging FPL success - I looked at average immediate points gained from transfers for the top 5 in HOF and they were almost all above 6! From what I see this is the main difference between them and most teams. Not surprising really

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 14 days ago

      True, but I wonder if it is a huge/significant difference?

      It would be great to measure the effectiveness of transfers over 2 to 3 gameweeks, that might reveal more. I'm not sure how to do that easily though...

      But 6 points average, they clearly know what they are doing.

      1. ANON.
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 14 days ago

        It seemed a big significant differencd to me. Every single one of the top 5 hof had a higher value than each person in my cash mini league. I agree that looking over more than 1 week as well as this would be ideal

  6. Kalou
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 14 days ago

    Great article, always a good read!

    Think any of the managers who wildcarded will bb in gw34? Will be interesting!

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 14 days ago

      Thank you, yes good question I was wondering that myself. Even though they Wildcarded they still have a number of single gameweek players. I think with getting Southampton players they could be setting themselves up for the later DGWs, making sure they get value out of DGW34 before needing to make fewer transfers for 36 & 37. So my guess would be no but I could well be wrong!

      1. Kalou
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 14 days ago

        I had a look at David Meechans team,he has x2 Sunderland,2x middlesburgh defenders/goalkeepers,they play each other gw34,if ever those teams are gonna get clean sheets this game is it! Bb definitely an option.Just speculating though, probably wrong!

        1. Kalou
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 14 days ago

          *Edit*
          Had another look,no chance of a bb in gw34,Barnes against utd,Yoshi against city!

          1. Kalou
            • 7 Years
            7 years, 14 days ago

            Chelsea even:)

            1. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 14 days ago

              He currently has 9 players with a DGW37 which could increase between now and then. Though with Lukaku home to Watford, Palace home to Hull, and Liverpool possibly still batting for 4th place, there are reasons for keeping a few single gameweek players. I fancy BB in 37.

            2. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 13 days ago

              the other thing to mention with David is that he still has his TC too, so if he decides to use TC in GW37, then he could well use BB in GW34.

              1. Kalou
                • 7 Years
                7 years, 13 days ago

                Thats a good point tm,also by gw37 sunderland may be down already!

  7. Dokdok666
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 14 days ago

    Great work, but I am continuously surprised that you think McAuleys 3.9PPG is bad value at 4.5m..?

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 14 days ago

      Yes, I will look at bit closer at player values next week. Thanks

  8. Reuser
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 14 days ago

    Anyone thinking Alli (c) might be a better option than Kane (c) this week?

    1. TopMarx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 13 days ago

      Possibly, but I prefer Kane, Lukaku and Aguero.