Community Submissions

Navigating the Blanks and Doubles

This article looks at the current state of play regarding likely blank and double Gameweeks caused by FA Cup involvement.

I’ve also made a number of assumptions for this article, mainly that the re-arrangement of the postponed games will follow the same principles as in the last few seasons, with fixtures being moved in blocks to midweeks where there are no Champions League or Europa League fixtures.

This is also largely aimed at those who still have their  second Wild Card, Free Hit and Bench Boost chips to play. I’ve treated the Triple Captain chip as a secondary consideration as it can be used in a double- Gameweek without any real need for forward planning.

Where I have talked about fixtures that are ‘likely to go ahead’, these assume that the higher placed team in the league will win each un-played FA Cup fixture.

Schedule

Gameweek 31 – the next set of fixtures with blanks.

Any team that has reached the FA Cup Quarter-Final will cause a blank this week. Just four to five games may take place this Gameweek.

  • Going ahead: Stoke-vs-Everton, Liverpool v Watford.
  • Likely to go ahead: Bournemouth v WBA, Huddersfield v Crystal Palace

Gameweek 34 – likely double Gameweek

It is likely that fixtures postponed from Gameweek 31 will be played here.

Gameweek 35 – another likely to involve blanks.

Any team that has reached the FA Cup Semi-Final is set to cause a blank this week. If four Premier League teams reach the semi-finals, expect only six to seven games to be played.

  • Going ahead: Arsenal v West Ham, Everton v Newcastle, Stoke v Burnley, Watford v Crystal Palace, and two other fixtures.
  • Likely to go ahead: West Brom v Liverpool.

Gameweek 37 – likely double Gameweek 

All un-played fixtures must be played this week. This is set to include all Gameweek 35 fixtures.

Another possible blank: Arsenal vs Man City will be moved from Gameweek 28 if their FA Cup fifth round tie with Wigan goes to a replay.

Strategies

To maximise players in each game week, you would need to significantly change your team between the blanks and its corresponding double.

Given how close together the blanks and doubles are, the Wild Card and Free Hit chips could be the best to make the changes to your team to avoid hits and maximise returns  between Gameweek 31 (blanks) and Gameweek 34 (doubles), and Gameweek 35 (blanks) and Gameweek 37 (doubles).

This suggests that the best strategy should be to use one of these two chips to negotiate each pair of blank and double Gameweeks.

Here are some possible strategies:

1. Free Hit in blank Gameweek 31, Bench Boost in double Gameweek 34, Wild Card in blank Gameweek 35 (Triple-Captain in double-GW37):

Build a Bench-Boost double Gameweek 34 team using free transfers over a number of weeks. Use the Free Hit Chip in Gameweek 31, as you would have very few players active that week. After the double Gameweek 34 Bench-Boost, you will probably lack blank- Gameweek 35 players and so you would Wild Card that Gameweek 35 to a team that could navigate the season run in.

  • PROs: you can ignore  Gameweek 31 planning; a wide selection of players should have a double Gameweek 34, so you are not too limited in your  Gameweeks 25-33 picks.
  • CONs: Could limit the number of players available in either blank Gameweek 35 or double Gameweek 37; late Wild Card could be seen as a waste.
  • Optimum situation: Few of the top Premier League teams make the FA Cup Semi-Final. This allows a squad to be built using the Wild Card in  Gameweek 35 that can field eleven starters that week and still have a good selection of double  Gameweek 37 players. The lack of Gameweek 28 blanks hinders this strategy.

2. Free Hit in blank Gameweek 31, Wild Card in Gameweek 36, Bench-boost in either double Gameweeks 34 or 37 (Triple-Captain in the other)

This is a variation on first strategy, where you to build a team that is strong in both double Gameweek 34 and blank Gameweek 35. This allows you to Wild Card in Gameweek 36 to maximise double Gameweek 37 players. This is likely to be better suited to Bench Boost in Gameweek 37 as, when using the Wild Card, you do not need to get any player with a single fixture in Gameweek 37 to cover the associated blank in Gameweek 35.

  • PROs: you can ignore Gameweek 31 planning; field a strong team in double Gameweek 37.
  • CONs: Could limit the number of players available in either double Gameweek 34 or blank Gameweek 35, and it is more difficult to build your team as you need to know the FA Cup Quarter-Final results; late Wild Card could be seen as a waste.
  • Optimum situation: if double Gameweek 37 looks like the better double- for Bench-boost, and/or, there are good options for double Gameweek 34 that do not blank in Gameweek 35 (e.g.  Gameweek 31 opponents of those in the FA Cup Quarter-Final, and teams that made the FA Cup Quarter-Final but not the Semi-Final).

3. Wild Card  Gameweek 32 or 33,  Free Hit Gameweek 35, Bench-boost in either double Gameweek 34 or 37 (Triple-Captain in the other):

This requires you to navigate blank Gameweek 31 with free transfers (and hits). You can use your Wild Card in Gameweek 32 or 33 to get a whole squad with double Gameweek players in both 34 and 37, and use the Free Hit chip to navigate blank Gameweek 35.

  • PROs: Should maximise double Gameweek 34, blank Gameweek 35 and double Gameweek 37 players; earlier wildcard.
  • CONs: potentially very weak in blank Gameweek 31, and around then if you have to carry sub-optimal players.
  • Optimum situation: If there are very few games in blank Gameweek 31, as you can cover the likely point scorers with your existing Liverpool players, a selection of cheap bench/rotation players and a couple of Free Transfers. The Free Hit in  Gameweek 35 is best where a lot of the top teams make the FA Cup Semi-Final, and so have doubles in both Gameweeks 34 and 37.

Conclusion

My view is that using the Bench Boost chip in double Gameweek 34 will be the best option simply because that is the week that is likely to have the most fixtures. This leaves Gameweek 37 as the best week for the Triple Captain chip.

The current consensus seems to be that Gameweek 31 is the best time to use the Free Hit. However, I think that – with Man City looking to have secured the Premier League title then the Sky Blues, as well as Manchester  United, Chelsea, and Tottenham are going to focus more on the FA Cup than in previous years. If this focus (and the luck of the draw) leads to progress for at least three of these teams to the FA Cup Semi-Final, there could be a lot of strong Fantasy Premier League options with double Gameweeks in both 34 and 37, but blanks in Gameweek 35. If this happens, I think that trying to navigate the earlier blank with Free Transfers and hits (as in previous years before the free-hit chip) and using the Free Hit in Gameweek 35 is the best strategy, though it is not without risk.

When you plan to use your Free Hit and Bench Boost chips affects which players you should be starting to target with your free transfers. I’d suggest deciding when to use your chips as soon as possible, so that you know whether you should be transfering in players with a Gameweek 31 fixture or not. Also, I’d suggest saving a free transfer in Gameweek 27, ahead of the FA Cup fifth Round fixtures.

Further Discussion

What strategy are you thinking of using? Could there be other interesting variations, such as using the Free Hit in a double Gameweek? What are people who have already used the Wild Card or Free Hit thinking of doing? Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

175 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Head scratching stuff ahead for Fantasy managers.

    Thanks for this.

    Main thing I've got from this is its made me think very hard about using the free ship in GWK 35 not 31.

    With Liverpool guaranteed a match in 31 and looking the key team to have coverage for it may indeed not be the best time to use a FH chip. Salah and Firmino are already in place.

    FH chip in 35 does allow for some nice planning around those doubles with the freedowm not to worry about blanks in between.

    Lots to ponder.

    1. gunner 2727
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      TBH FH just screams 35 for all hose who still hold. Personally because I don't I hope everyone uses it gw31!

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      What GW did you play your second WC last season ? Did the rest of the FFS illuminati follow your lead ?

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        The earlier of the two most popular times.

        As I recall it was those who used it later that did better on the whole.

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Cheers

          I remember there was huge debate at the time, lots of pros and cons 🙂

          1. The Rumour Mill
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I think the later WC worked well last season as the blank and DGW fell in the same gameweek (GW34), which had a nullifying effect and ensured that I think only one team blanked and only 3 had a DGW in GW34. GW37 was the big gameweek last season with 10 teams with doubles, and also a DGW36 AND 37 for Southampton and Arsenal. Therefore those who wildcarded in GW35 or 36 really made big gains in these gameweeks if they selected players wisely.

            This year I believe a later wildcard (GW35 or later) will not have as strong an impact, firstly because we are not gaining an additional DGW from the league cup final (unless Wigan v City goes to a replay), meaning that we aren't going to get (for example) back to back DGW's for City in GW36 and 37 like we did with Arsenal last season. Secondly, DGW34 looks likely to be the "bigger" DGW (5.44 projected blanks in GW31 v 3.17 projected blanks in GW35 according to Ben Crellin), therefore mathmatically you have a greater chance of picking up points in 34 than 37. And thirdly, because the earlier you use a wildcard, the more weeks you can benefit from it.

            1. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              I clocked up 375 points in the last 3 game weeks last season (GW36 WC, 37BB) so I may have a rose tinted memeory 😉

              1. The Rumour Mill
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Nice one! I got 347 (-8) in the last 3 gameweeks too so was similarly delighted 🙂 But we have to judge each season on its individual unique landscape, and I'm definately leaning towards a much earlier wildcard this time.

    3. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks for publishing this. I like the editing too.

      I'm thinking triple Liverpool + one good budget pick from each other teams playing should be enough for GW31.

      1. gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Great article nice work!

  2. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    We like to keep comments in community articles to the subject matter. If you would like advice on your team or want to ask a general question please post on the current main article. Cheers.

    1. jpb333
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      +1 so annoying when first comment after a good article is 'please rate my team'

  3. Joggers Nipple
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Appreciated but waaay too much for me to understand. Log on here weekly and see whats for me.

  4. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Think I need some paracetamol ... Planning ahead on who to bring in for double gw is too risky imo as your plans can fall apart with I juries and suspensions. I m using free hit for 31 for sure , anything else, I haven't decided yet. Good luck to all 🙂

  5. Fitzy.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Thanks Morph, great effort!

    1. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Yeah great article 🙂

    2. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks.

  6. Kroneek
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Best strategy if no Free Hit Chip is available? All others still intact..

    1. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      You definitely need to make sure you can get a half decent XI out for GWK 31.

      1. Kroneek
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Shot - thanks

        Planning starts now!

      2. ktk_interista
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I am in the same position of no FH chip. I think having 3 Liverpool and 3 Everton would be enough for damage limitation. Wouldn't mind fielding 8 players in GW 31 since mostly the small teams are playing. I already have Salah and will have 2 of Moreno, VVD and Mane come GW 31 and wouldn't mind keeping them after that as they have strong fixtures. I already have Walcott, Pickford and DCL (needs to go probably) and tempted by Coleman if he is fit and in form.

    2. gunner 2727
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      I've run through this as in same boat. The answer is it isn't easy, free hit looks far more valuable than WC as can boomerang team before and after gw35.

      Best I could work out was

      -Work now on GW 31(8players)
      - 3 weeks to ship blankers for DGW 34 (probably 3x-4)
      - WC 35, have some for blank GW 35 (6/7 players)
      -two weeks to load up on 37 DGW.

      Obviously BB TC on either of doubles.

      Anyone improve on that?

    3. David Slade
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Am considering just accepting it to be terrible and save the FH for 35. Might try get a few in but not going to lose sleep over a shocking 31.

      1. Kroneek
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah I suppose everyone will be in the same boat

      2. gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Haha, proper trolling that... agree and then say when you are playing your FH when the question is wtf to do if you haven't got one!

        1. David Slade
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Oh apologies! If I didn't have FH I would just use transfers wisely, accept 31 to be rubbish and then maybe alter my WC in 33 differently to make 35 less painful. Just depends who is out of the cup at that point.

  7. drughi
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    WC gw 33 BB chip gw 34 and TC gw 37 if no free hit chip ?

  8. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    The gw the most blanks wil be 31 right?

    1. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Yes. Could be only three games played if the FA Cup ties go as expected and WBA win.

      GW35 will be six games minimum.

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        thanks. is it even worth using free hit chip for such little games ??

        1. the Penman
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Arguably not. Minimal gain over others. Just have Stoke, Everton and Bournemouth cheapies lines up with 2-3 Liverpool.

  9. Hotdogs for Tea
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    I think this is a good starter, but decisions will need to be made based on actual fixtures.

    It may be possible to manage one of the blanks, FH the other, TC the first DGW and then have a ‘burner’ WC team in 36 for the DGW37 bench boost with the cash spread on decent playing bench ... just GW38 to manoeuvre with a decent bench to deal with the traditional last game rotation

  10. Frasmac
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Great article thanks

  11. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Which is the biggest dgw ?34 ? Wc in 33 then would make sense wouldn it ?

  12. DGW blindness is for Kinnea…
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Nice work

  13. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    My biggest concern is : you use wc in gw 33 to have a full squad playing in 34 and using bench boost chip. What about the rest of the season if the players you brought in don't have good fixtures ?? I m more tempted to use treble captain in 34 I admit.

    1. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Yip, that is why WC 36 & BB 37 (with a few hits in 37 if necessary) interests me because the balance of your team is less important - you just have one game to go

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks

  14. BRONALDINHO
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Why wouldn't I just Free hit 31, WC 33, BB 34 and then TC 37?

    1. Eze Really?
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      This^

      1. Eze Really?
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        However, you can build a GW34 squad easier than GW37

    2. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Only 1 FT from DGW team to blank week in 35.

        1. gunner 2727
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Sorry you'd said it already

      • gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Because you'll miss out on decent gw35?

      • dimitros
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        This is my plan. The only problem is what to do with Blank GW35, it will have less blanks than 31, but will it be possible to fix it with 2-4 hits?

    3. Ruud000
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      I posted about this a couple of weeks ago, but surely there is value in using Free Hit in a Double GW to get 11 double players?

      1. gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        There is but obviously downsides. Use it for 37 and you have to jump 34 double to 35 blank. Use it for 34 and team for 33 needs to be Blank driven for 35, probably better than first option but still not as good as having double team for 34/36 and FH 35

    4. TomSaints
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Are there any new transfers that play on people's minds.

      I'm very tempted by Sturridge at West Brom, especially if they start to play anything like they did against Liverpool. I also feel going KDB -> Sanchez could prove profitable as we all know how explosive he is and there really is a lot of supporting talent in the united squad.

      Aubameyang could also be immense at Arsenal.

      But to take advantage of any of this (and fix my Kane less team) i'm genuinely leaning towards Wildcarding in next game week or two.

    5. Eze Really?
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      One thing missing here.
      I can easily have 6 players playing GW31.
      Not so sure the other 5 milling will get me more than 15 points.
      Gw 34 will have Pool playing Bournemouth so I will hold onto these SGW players Especially when I have 1 mil plus in tfr's to sacrifice.
      The rest I agree with but the free hit chip has no real intrinsic value, especially when I might want to use the transfer for a future DGW or injury problem.
      Do I make sense?

      1. gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Hence use it in 35. Far better than 31

        1. Eze Really?
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Commenting on the article that says use it GW31.
          Anyway I used it already and made 31 point profit on my team.

          1. gunner 2727
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Haha! I did also, hated it as knew it would be useful for 30-38 but had 8 doubts one week, managed 95 points but tbh I think I'd still swap the 40 points for having it

    6. Athletic Bilbo
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      I’ve been considering an alternative, longer term strategy and would be interested in your thoughts.

      Plan would be to Wild Card after gw28. At this point there are huge fixture shifts and European rotation. Before gw29 starts we will know the gw31 fixtures, and hopefully the rescheduling is confirmed for GW34. Without going crazy on gw31 this would at least allow for reasonable coverage of the first blank. The wc team overall is geared toward the fixture shifts and DGW34, with the transfers between 31 and 34 maximising the doubles.

      DGW34 = bench boost
      BGW35 = free hit
      DGW37 = TC

      I’m considering that the early wild card will allow for green arrows over several weeks as the template shifts, whilst targeting B.B. in DGW 34. 34 may not be the optimal team but should be more than adequate.

      What are your thoughts?

      1. gunner 2727
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I think it's spot on. Only question is whether you can prepare for 31 and the fixture shift with the 6 weeks we have now, which then enables 31-33 WC to nail 34.

        1. Athletic Bilbo
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I think it’s possible. The FA Cup replays are finished before GW29 starts so the 31 blanks and 34 doubles are known.

          The worrying aspect is if the rescheduled games aren’t formally confirmed and they put some of them in GW37

      2. Kabayan
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        DGW34 = bench boost
        BGW35 = free hit
        DGW37 = TC
        I like this.
        CL in gw29 and gw30 and than international break in gw31. Makes WC in gw32/33 more appealing, imo.

        1. Athletic Bilbo
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I see the complications around those gw’s you mention as a good reason to clear out Chelsea, City, United assets in GW29 and reintroduce them after the Blank and IB?

      3. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        So, option 3 but with an earlier wild card?

        This could be good if you are unhappy with your current team, and there are very few games in GW31.

        I think that you'd be slightly weaker in either GW31 or 34 but, as you say, the earlier WC could make those points back.

        1. Athletic Bilbo
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Thanks for the article Morph, really timely for me. Another advantage is I can make aggressive short term transfers over the next 3gw which might further increase the value of the wildcard

        2. Athletic Bilbo
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          To be honest I’m not too unhappy with the current team (it’s pretty template) but I don’t see the current template working so well from GW28 onward.

      4. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        As I have no FH left I like a WC post GW 28 to at least get some sort of 31 team in place. I envisage 3 Liverpool in it looking at their fixtures and non blank 31. Then after 31 try and set up for the big 34 BB or TC.

        1. Athletic Bilbo
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Yes, I agree on the Liverpool. I won’t want more than 7 or 8 for gw31 so the wc can set up easily for that, especially with 3 transfers available before the blank

      5. Weeb Kakashi
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Very reasonable.
        Pros would be the fixture turn and green arrows

        Con would be a slightly weaker 34 team.
        But guess you'd already make it up by then

    7. dark91
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      There is a small typo in the section about GW 34. Should be games postponed from (GW 31) instead of GW 34.
      But great article thank you 🙂

    8. Bragazeti
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Great read. Let's hope the schedule doesn't complicate it further.

    9. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      I think Liverpool having a blank gw31 is a good reason to go for option 3. There is a good chance the only teams playing is Liverpool, Watford, Stoke, Everton, Huddersfield, Crystal Palace (most likely Bournemouth West Brom and i expect one other top6 play that gw). We have 6 or 7 free transfers to plan for this gw, and most of us have two Liverpool players already. I cant see a free hit team with 11 players beat a "planned team" of for example Salah, Firmino, Mane + 4-5 other players who dont blank with many points.

    10. chaser123
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks very much for this - really good to start thing about how to approach the rest of the season.

      Looking ahead to GW31, and assuming as you say that only the below games go ahead, what starting 11 would you want?
      Stoke v Everton
      Liverpool v Watford
      Bournemouth v WBA
      Huddersfield v Crystal Palace

      1. The Rumour Mill
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Pickford
        VVD, Stoke defender, Dawson, Sakho, Schindler
        Salah, Zaha, Shaquiri/Chuopo Moting, Ibe/Fraser/Stanislas, Milijovic
        Firmino, Wilson, Rodriguez

        1. chaser123
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Interesting - thanks. Don't think much of Richarlison away at Liverpool?

          1. The Rumour Mill
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            No problem. Well Richarlison has a fixture at least, which will immediately make him more attractive than 50% of the players that week haha. But I don't think he is a good prospect at present, he was unhappy Marco Silva left, has not had a break from football for over a year, and away at Anfield is a difficult fixture for opposing attackers at the best of times (unless your name is Jay Rodriguez)

            1. chaser123
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Yes, that's totally fair enough - and I agree to be honest.

              Its obviously early days but I'm thinking of bringing in...
              - Walcott in GW27 (if he looks good this week and next)
              - Bournemouth/WBA/Soton/Swansea defenders in GW28-30 based upon FA Cup results
              - Zaha and Sakho in GW31

              (I already have Pickford, Gomez, Salah, Firmino and Wilson)

              1. The Rumour Mill
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Yeah Walcott could work if Sam gets Everton performing as an attacking entity. Your second and third bullet points I agree with, when are you planning to WC?

                1. chaser123
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  My current thoughts are:

                  - build up my team now for GW31 (as above)
                  - wildcard in GW32
                  - bench boost in GW34
                  - free hit in GW35
                  - triple captain in GW37

                  What do you think?

                  1. The Rumour Mill
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 3 months ago

                    Yeah I like that strategy 🙂 And you can always swap around when you play the TC and BB if you want too, depending on what happens in the meantime. I'm definately thinking FH in 35 is looking optimal over 31 at this stage too.

    11. The Rumour Mill
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Great article, thank you. I think the triple captaincy needs to be given greater consideration though, none of us want to end up giving it to the likes of Andy Carroll again!

      The candidates for this I can see (assuming the ties progress as expected) are (in my rank order):

      1. Man Utd attacker in DGW34 (West ham away, WBA home), possibly Lukaku, Sanchez
      2. Arsenal attacker in DGW34 (leicester away, newcastle away), possibly Aubemayang, Lacazette, Ozil, Miki
      3. Chelsea attacker in DGW34 (Burnley away, Southampton away), possibly Hazard, Alonso, Morata
      4. Spurs attacker in DGW34 (Newcastle home, Man City Home)
      5. City attacker in DGW34 (Brighton home, Spurs away), possibly Aguero, Sterling etc.

      1. City in DGW37 (Swansea home, Huddersfield home)
      2. Utd in DGW37 (Bournemouth away, Brighton away)
      3. Spurs in DGW37 (Brighton away, WBA away)
      4. Chelsea in DGW37 (Huddersfield Home, Liverpool home)

      Simply put, Ideally we are looking for a player with 2 strong fixtures, preferably at home. However, there are other factors to consider. DGW34 falls between the second leg of the Champions league/Europa Lg quarter finals and the FA cup semi finals. If any of these teams are in both (or even just 1, to an extent) I would expect some rotation in these league games. However, GW37 falls between the second leg of the champions league semi finals and GW38. There is a strong chance that some of the sides involved in DGW37 will have been knocked out the CL by then (and possibly the FA cup aswell), meaning they only have the league to play for. This could enhance them as options, particularly if there is a battle for the top 4 and/or golden boot to consider. Furthermore, Manchester City are highly likely to have won the league by GW37. Rotation will surely come into play if they have Finals in the FA cup and/or CL to consider.

      In summary then, plenty of factors to keep an eye on which could shift the landscape considerably, but at this point, I would be targeting an Arsenal attacker or Utd attacker in DGW34 or a Spurs or Utd attacker in DGW37.

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        thanks for that very helpful !!

      2. Fpl Richie
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        37 for TC it is - lovely options there. Kane, Sanchez probably top picks.

    12. GylfiPleasures
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      At the end of the season, there are always teams that change priorities from the Premier League – see Liverpool 2 years ago and United last year in Europa. Looking at this year, I think there is a very good chance Tottenham will lose to Juve in the Champions League and then be all guns blazing for 4th spot & FA Cup.

      Arsenal whilst out of the FA Cup have great fixtures from March onwards – if they build momentum in the league they could focus on trying to gain 4th spot, or they could go the other way and focus all on Europa. In the last 2 years I’ve triple captained Sanchez in these situations to great results. This year they currently don’t have THAT guy, but Auba/Mkhi/Lacazette (especially Auba when you consider he’s no eligible in the Europa) could become a great triple captain candidate in GW34 IF Leicester progress past the FA Cup 5th Round.

      Their fixtures in GW34 could be
      LEI (A)
      NEW (A)

      1. The Rumour Mill
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Great point on Aubemayang elegability. Spurs as you say and also Chelsea (v Barcelona) are the prime candidates to exit the CL at this stage. Hazard and Alonso become great options for 34 then too (maybe not as captains, but certainly as members of your team)

    13. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      i just dont know anymore ....:0

    14. Jay_
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Great article. I'm planning for 31 now to save the FH for 35, you summed up the pros and cons nicely.

        Just to add, BOU v WBA in gw31 isn't really likely to go ahead. It's got the best chance of all the rest of going ahead but that would require Southampton to win at WBA in round 5 (or get a replay and win at home).

        1. chaser123
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Agreed - Swansea v Soton is the alternative (I think). I wouldn't build up on any of those teams until we see the results in round 5..

        2. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          True re: WBA. I said at the top that I'd assumed the higher place league team would win each un-played fixture - so that's why I included it - but Soton are only 1 place above WBA and are away, so it is far from a given. (I wrote most of this before the draw).

          At least well know in a few GW's time.

      • MINUS FOUR
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        For me it's the fact I know GW31 will have a high number of blanks for sure. I can clearly plan around which teams it will be, so I can absolutely load of up on players that will have a DGW34 between now and then, play Free Hit in GW31 to get a completely different team, and save WC for GW35 to negotiate that blank and DGW37 at the same time.

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          This will work very well indeed if a few good teams play in GW35 and have a DGW in GW37 - it's just a case of if we are going to know the fixtures early enough for GW37 though. If no teams that play GW35 have a DGW in GW37, you may well have to either be short for GW35, or be short of DGWers for GW37 (or have to take hits)

          1. MINUS FOUR
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I know what you're saying, but these are 'maybes' and they are not necessarily big ones. I will have my WC for this period, so the more info the better and of course I'll be hoping some teams that play GW35 also have a double in DGW37. I'm betting the flexibility of the WC will mean I can make a team 'good enough' for GW35 and extremely good for GW37.

            The big advantage is that my Free Hit will absolutely help me, there is no doubt. And I get to keep all of the best players from top clubs as I plan for DGW34 with zero stress about BGW31. It turns GW31 into its own little bubble, I will have the best team possible, but my actual team will still be filled with Jones, Alonso, Kane, Aguero, Sterling, and all those players that other managers will be ditching just so they can get 8 players out for GW31.

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Sounds good - you will have the bonus as well if a few good teams play in GW35 and have a DGW in GW37, which I think there may well be - the article says it is likely that all GW31 postponed will just be moved to GW34, but I believe from recent seasons this has never been the case (might be wrong though).

              1. MINUS FOUR
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 6 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Yes I think there is a very good chance of that happening. And with the WC, it will mean potentially great freedom to tailor a team that fits GW35 and DGW37 fixtures by stocking up on the teams that meet both criteria.

      • MINUS FOUR
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Also I think planning for GW31 is far from ideal because it means building a team (with transfers and hits) that is not very good. Aside from Liverpool players, you are bringing in less optimal players over a number of weeks. And you probably still won't be able to field a full XI.

        But if you plan to Free Hit GW31 you can totally ignore this and start loading up massively on double gwers for DGW34. By the time you get there you will have 15 players with a DGW and you won't have to use a chip to achieve it. BB time.

        1. chaser123
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          What about building up a team for GW31 and then wildcarding in GW32? Is that stupid?

          1. Now I'm Panicking
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Considering this too 🙂 Depends a lot on how the fixtures for GW32 and GW33 look for team that are going to have DGWs in 34 and/or 37.

          2. MINUS FOUR
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            It's not stupid, but it's not smart. The thing about this is that you are 'building' a team that doesn't have ideal players. This GW31 team you want to create between now and then cannot have DDG, Alonso, Jones, Otamendi, Hazard, Sterling, Silva, KDB, Son, Eriksen, Sanchez, Lingard, Pogba, Aguero, Kane and others. Are you going to get rid of your best assets each week so that you have a GW31 team?

            It's so much easier to simply focus on building the best team (for GW34 i.e. good players from top clubs just as you would anyway) and Free Hit GW31 in order to keep your team together.

            Also, if you do it the other way you will literally be buying back the best assets straight away on your WC for more than you just sold them for.

            1. chaser123
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Yeh fair point, and very nicely put. Maybe it's due to what my team is now but I don't think my prep for GW31 is too difficult.

              - I currently have Pickford, Gomez, Salah, Firmino and Wilson (so 5 potential players for GW31).
              - I will keep Sterling, Kane and Jones and put them on my bench.
              - that means I need to replace Otamendi, Dunk, Ogbonna, Bernardo Silva, Lingard and Son in the weeks building up to GW31 (and replace them with Sakho, DEF1, DEF2, Zaha and Walcott)

              Then a wildcard in GW32, I can reset those players that are no longer particularly useful (as they don't have upcoming DGWs) in prep for GW34.

              Appreciate any further comments you have!

              1. MINUS FOUR
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 6 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                That's fair. My plan is based on my team, which isn't already stocked up like yours is for 31. You can very easily make it to 31 and put out a good team. 37 is where you might regret it - WC gone 5 weeks in advance, Free Hit gone in 35, so much could have changed by then and you won't have a chip to help you load up on DGW players for 37.

                1. chaser123
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  Yeh, that's fair enough - I have ended up with a team that is more geared up to GW31 than most (by chance) and so it has perhaps forced my hand.

                  As mentioned in the original article, I just need to hope that a few of the big teams get to the FA cup semis (fingers crossed Man Utd v Tottenham and Man City v Chelsea) and hence the players involved in the DGW34 and DGW37 are similar!

                  For now, I will approach it this way and see what happens in the FA Cup 5th round in a few weeks!!

                  1. MINUS FOUR
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 6 Years
                    6 years, 3 months ago

                    Sounds like a solid plan. Good luck.

        2. gunner 2727
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Don't agree. V easy to ship out the smaller players with 31 in mind.... can get 7/8 including Pool players without changing strength of team.

        3. dimitros
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I agree.
          I have also check how i would plan in case of No Free Hit for 31.
          It would be:

          A) Currently have Salah Firmino Shaqiri Holgate and DCL(does not count a lot)
          B) Son,Arnautovic, Stones, Ogbonna, Adrian out for Doucoure/Richarlison, Walcott, Gomez, Schinlder, Butland

          It seems viable but how good does it seem to carry Walcott and Gomez instead of Son and Stones?

      • MINUS FOUR
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Here's a team anyone could have in GW31 using their Free Hit. And you don't need to sell all the great fpl assets from City, United, Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea, etc to get it. Seriously, imagine trying to sell Alonso, Kane, Aguero, Otamendi, Sterling, Lingard, Pogba, etc etc in the next 6GWs just so you can put out a rather ordinary team in GW31.

        Free Hit Team for GW31:

        Pickford (Hennessy)
        Daniels - Zouma - Dawson (Evan - Schindler)
        Mane - Sigurdsson - Zaha - Salah (Shaqiri)
        Firmino - Tosun - Benteke

        Not too shabby. I'll happily take this team over whatever other managers can scramble together with or without planning.

        1. MINUS FOUR
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          This team has precisely ONE player who is already in my team (Salah). And I will be able to keep every player I want from top clubs that will then have a DGW34. Keep in mind if you sell them all (Alonso, Sterling etc) you will have to buy them back for more later, and your WC team will have less value which might cost you better picks.

        2. The Rumour Mill
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          But from gameweeks 28-33 your City assets will likely have:

          ars, CHE, sto, BLANK, eve, MNU

          Your Utd assets:

          CHE, pal, LIV, BLANK, SWA, mnc

          Your Chelsea assets:

          mnu, mnc, PAL, BLANK, SPU, WHU

          The question then becomes, do you want them prior to DGW34 anyway?

          1. MINUS FOUR
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            The answer is yes I do, because they are City and United assets and the fixtures don't put me off that much. Alonso, Jones, Sterling, Kane - season keepers. City assets just about fixture proof.

            Plus the BLANK is not a blank at all, it's when I will Free Hit GW31 and have the best possible team you could have.

          2. Athletic Bilbo
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Precisely why I’m considering wc in 29. Champions league rotation most likely around their easier fixtures too

        3. gunner 2727
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          That's fine but all eggs in one basket, then have to sacrifice either 34 double or 35 blank where as if use FH 35 can have most of those you've listed anyway for 31 without shipping those assets you want to keep

          1. MINUS FOUR
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            We don't know and won't know what GW35 will look like. It might not be that bad. There could be 2 blank fixtures. And I'll have a Wildcard.

            But we do have advance warning that there will be a lot of blanks in GW31. It's the GW most affected, so it makes sense to use a chip to navigate it. When 35 comes around and I have my WC, I don't think I'll be too worried about having played my Free Hit already.

            1. gunner 2727
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Don't really get it. I have no FH and 34-35-37 looks horrid vs FH. There won't be only two blanks, and most likely 4 but most importantly will include the best teams so even with a WC I will have to split team with blankers and doubles for 37. Play FH can go from doubles team to Blank team and get doubles team back, will require a little surgery obviously. 31 doesn't scare me at all as will have 7/8 and the ones I don't have will all be poor teams or poor fixture (richy vs pool for instance)

          2. MINUS FOUR
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Don't have to sacrifice 34 double because I have 9FT between now and then to ensure my team are DGWers, and play Bench Boost. No other blank or double gives us the amount of planning time as 34.

      • Urchin
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Anybody got a link to ben Crellin's spreadsheet for BGW & DGW?

          1. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Thanks, I was considering adding this link to the article; I read his stuff between writing and submitting it, and we've had some similar thoughts.His probabilities for each game going-ahead are especially useful.

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Your article gives much better advice than Ben's article did last year though (no offence Ben if you are reading this)

              1. Morph - Unbelievable Geoff
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Thanks, high praise.

            2. The Rumour Mill
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              No problem 🙂 Yeah I check it all the time haha. Yeah they are for the next round. Any subequent rounds odds though completely depend on the yet to be made draw though so you have to take those probabilities with a huge amount of salt really!

          2. Forza Juventus
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Cheers, appreciate this. Was rly helpful last year