854
Members November 8

How Richarlison has adapted to centre-forward role at Everton

854 Comments
Share

Richarlison (£6.9m) has made a mockery of recent suggestions that he cannot play as a centre-forward for Everton.

Two weeks ago we compared his first two performances in that position against his displays as a left attacking midfielder and discovered some discouraging results.

However, it appears both Richarlison and his manager Marco Silva were spurred on by the criticism. They stuck to their guns and persisted with the new role, and in the last two Gameweeks the Brazilian has registered two goals and an assist, averaging 10 points per game.

We are now revisiting the data to see whether or not Richarlison really has adapted to a striker’s role and if recent performances are sustainable or not.

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of just £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

854 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Typo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Rich in this week, or Anderson? Leaning towards anderson. Maddo the fallguy

    Open Controls
    1. altan8797
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      im between anderson richarli and fraser. (gonna bring in richarli anyway next week for another mc)

      Open Controls
    2. DaddyPig
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Ha ha! I’d help but I’m asking the same question. I’m thinking Richarlison is safer but Anderson more fun? Tough one!

      Open Controls
      1. Typo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        The same. Think Ill go for the fun one 🙂

        Open Controls
    3. Overated Mou
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Do you have arnie? If yes, i would go for rich while keeping an eye on felipe

      Open Controls
      1. Typo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        I have Arnie.. Its not easy this

        Open Controls
  2. DaddyPig
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Fabianski
    Robertson Alonso Mendy
    Salah Hazard Fraser Barkley *Maddison
    Aguero Arnie

    Patricio Success AWB Doherty

    6.9 and a wildcard itb

    Maddison to:

    A) Anderson
    B) Richarlison
    C) ?

    Thanks and good luck all!

    Open Controls
    1. Overated Mou
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Rich for me. Already have arnie

      Open Controls
  3. FFSbet.com
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Kept Mane till GW9 and sold for Mitro + Maddy and destroyed them...Martial is similar now after 4 hauls.

    Hope he will stay good.

    Open Controls
    1. diesel001
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Would be good if you could destroy Martial for FPL....

      Open Controls
      1. FFSbet.com
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        3rd time's a charm

        Open Controls
  4. Holmes
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Giroud back, hmm...

    Open Controls
  5. DV8R
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Is it good or bad news that Hazard is starting tonight?

    Open Controls
    1. Rash
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Depends how he finishes.

      Open Controls
    2. kime67
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      bad. barkley too..

      Open Controls
      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        🙄

        Open Controls
    3. Overated Mou
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Means hes fit enough to start

      Open Controls
    4. Wild Rover
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Obviously good unless he gets injured. He’s playing to build up his game time, not so he can be rested at the weekend

      Open Controls
    5. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      As long as he doesnt get injured, its fine...

      will get warm up for everton

      Open Controls
    6. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      As long as it doesn’t get him injured. Other team are roughing him up a bit atm

      Open Controls
  6. McSauce
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Maddison and Aguero ---> Mane and Arnie

    Open Controls
    1. HurriKane
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      wouldnt get rid of kun

      Open Controls
    2. kime67
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      yes if you have salah

      Open Controls
      1. McSauce
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        Yes I have Salah (C)

        Open Controls
    3. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Don’t take out Kun

      Open Controls
  7. Dynamic Duos
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Dele Alli

    Open Controls
    1. The White Pele
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      this

      Open Controls
  8. HurriKane
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Need a hot topic on budget Enablers below 5.1m. (for Maddison owners movings funds to defence)

    Brooks vs Murphy vs Kenedy vs Diangana

    Open Controls
    1. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Looked at Murphy's stats for last 2-3 of games and they are meh, so I would avoid him

      Open Controls
      1. HurriKane
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        from what ive watched he seems cardiff only threat. Very direct and has a couple of shots in him. but lack of quality around him is not helping.

        Open Controls
    2. SAKA AND EMILE SMITH ROWE
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Have Murphy currently but will most likely bring in Diangana when I WC for GW15

      Open Controls
    3. PaperTroopers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Agree!
      Add Milner, Kayal, Camarasa, Barkley

      Open Controls
      1. HurriKane
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        milner - takes 3rd liverpool slot away which is not appealing.

        kayal- not nailed? plays deep i guess

        camarasa- on set peices. not the most excitng option though. neves comes to mind

        barkley- will rotate with kova

        Open Controls
        1. HurriKane
          • 11 Years
          5 years, 6 months ago

          i like deulofeu and demara gray though. if they are nailed could be decent punts

          Open Controls
    4. FPL Daniel
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Also Patterson

      Open Controls
    5. TAArt
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      I’ve gone Diangana allows me a double transfer after IB to get in Digne and Doherty as fourth and fifth defenders of with fixtures against Cardiff and Huddersfield at home. Woof. Like the look of brooks too but already have Wilson and tough fixtures and the above allows me to rotate Diangana for the city game.

      Open Controls
    6. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      One of the latter two for me. Probably Diangana

      Open Controls
  9. ClassiX
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Advice please - Maddi replacement options for not more than 6.8m
    - Pereyra
    - Pedro
    - Lamela
    - Milner
    - Deulofeu
    - Demarai Gray
    Can't have Anderson as already have 3 West Ham and already have Richi.

    Open Controls
    1. McSauce
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      I have same problem, have Barkley so dont want pedro it may be Pereyra

      Open Controls
      1. ClassiX
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        Is Lamela a complete no-no? I know Dele and Eriksen are coming back, but he has looked way more effective than both Moura and Son the last 3 games.

        Open Controls
    2. FPL Daniel
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Gray

      Open Controls
      1. ClassiX
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        Thanks - he is the obvious direct replacement for Maddi I assume?

        Open Controls
  10. Dont choose VW. Pickford
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Anyone considering maddison to gray to keep leicester cover?

    Open Controls
    1. Rash
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Do Leicester need covering?

      Open Controls
      1. FPL Daniel
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        Me. Interesting punt imo. Him or Murphy/Patterson

        Open Controls
      2. Dont choose VW. Pickford
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        have some of the best fixtures in the league over next 4 games including burnley at home which is a gimme for goals right now, wouldnt be a long term option

        Open Controls
    2. TAArt
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      He was my second choice

      Open Controls
  11. kime67
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    seems like kovacic will start ahead of barkley at the weekend.

    Open Controls
    1. HurriKane
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      rip barkley wagon.

      Open Controls
    2. NilSatisNisiOptimum78
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Got a link dude?

      Open Controls
      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        He also thinks Hazard won’t play, ignore

        Open Controls
        1. Sir Edo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          5 years, 6 months ago

          Lineup tonight will definitly tell who is starting gw12. No way playing him if starting tonight..

          Open Controls
          1. Sir Edo
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            5 years, 6 months ago

            RIP Barkley! 🙂

            Open Controls
          2. Wild Rover
            • 13 Years
            5 years, 6 months ago

            Lol

            Open Controls
            1. Sir Edo
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              5 years, 6 months ago

              In same boat?

              Open Controls
          3. Ronnie Hotdog
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 6 months ago

            But I thought Sarri said Hazard needs some game time so he'll be giving him about 45 mins tonight.

            Open Controls
    3. Sir Edo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Why? Starting lineups already out or already started 18.00?

      Open Controls
      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        😆

        Open Controls
  12. Planet Head
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Sounds like Dynamo Kiev just scored. I live next to their ground 🙂

    Open Controls
    1. NilSatisNisiOptimum78
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Cheers, got them in my accu

      Open Controls
      1. Planet Head
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        2-0.

        Rennes have got HAtem ben arfa as well. maybe should've gone

        Open Controls
      2. Planet Head
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        sounds like 2 in quick succession

        Open Controls
    2. Jonny HOW SON?
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      why didn't you go to the match then?

      Open Controls
      1. Planet Head
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        Didn't know about it tbh. Sounds like another goal btw.

        Open Controls
  13. MMN
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    2 FT, 1.4m ITB. Any thoughts?

    I want Salah C this week but it's a case of Hazard or Salah for the next two - if I do sell, Hazard will come back in for GW14. So Haz & Bilva > Salah & Anderson/Pereyra or just Bilva > someone?

    Pat (Hamer)
    Alonso, Robbo, Mendy (Doherty, AWB)
    Hazard, Mane, Bilva, Richa, Fraser
    Aguero, Arnie (Kamara)

    Open Controls
  14. altan8797
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    i was going to get richarli for kenedy next week but now that maddi is gone here are my choices

    a) richarli this week fraser next
    b) via versa

    help will be much appreciated

    Open Controls
    1. altan8797
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      c) richarli this week martial next

      Open Controls
  15. Sir Edo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Good evening all! Do you think Sucess starting now when Deeney is back? Watford obviously playing well but didn’t score, might be one more Success chance in starting 11?

    Open Controls
    1. AC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      should get one more start

      Open Controls
  16. KUNingas
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Is Martial no go? Any better below 8.5 mids? Have Fraser and Rich already

    Open Controls
    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      He is the mist inform player mate

      Open Controls
    2. The White Pele
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      good option imo. fixtures are good too after man city

      Open Controls
  17. Federico
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    I'm holding 4.1 millions in the bank, and was actually going to roll over my FT, but now Maddison happens. If I sell him for Martial, that's still 3.5 ITB. Anything worth a hit?

    Ederson - 4.0
    R A M - ABW - Bennett
    Haz - Mané - Rich - Martial* - Højbjerg
    Arnie - Vardy - Jimenez

    I got exact cash for Vardy to Kane, but that feels like a gamble doomed to fail.

    Open Controls
  18. Pierce34
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    So some people got caught out by doing early transfers and then having Maddison injured, and still considering getting Richarlison today? Before Silva's presser tomorrow, when earlier in the week he said Richarlison would have to be assessed after a knock?

    Open Controls
    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Be gentle mate 😀
      People are hurt after expecting alot from madds !!

      Open Controls
  19. McSauce
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Maddison to -->

    Gary
    Fraser
    Pereyra

    Open Controls
    1. Silecro
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Scottish Insigne

      Open Controls
  20. 1justlookin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Best 5.0 MID or below, narrowed it down to -

    Kenedy
    Camarasa
    Diangana

    Open Controls
    1. Wild Rover
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Diangana of those but prefer Murphy

      Open Controls
  21. Desperately Seeking Dusan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    This Richarlison article cannot be serious - two weeks it was how Richarlison was a failure now he was playing up front and after a good GW a new article comes out saying he's adapted?!

    It's impossible to take such knee jerking seriously... posting knee jerk comments is one thing but written articles for paying members? Makes me question the purpose of paying a membership fee when there's so much info and stats out there for free now.

    Open Controls
    1. McSauce
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Fair point

      Open Controls
    2. HNI
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      I guess the imp point is his heat maps which show him being more central now. I like the comparison tool and rmt. The membership fee isnt steep for those 2. Plus On WC last week the paid tools helped me decide to go with Rich over Maddison so in my case membership helped me climb to 1600 overall right now

      Open Controls
      1. Desperately Seeking Dusan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        I do agree with you on the tools and I use them (but I’m a huge RMT skeptic - I think it’s statisitically flawed), especially the comparison but this stuff is becoming more freely available and I increasingly just pull the raw data myself now to compute moving exponential averages etc, stuff more advanced than here. I think any paid site or newspaper etc justifies the fee by the quality of articles and insight. As an example relating to my field, I’m not going to pay for research from a provider that one week tells me a stock is a sell and then after it outperforms tells me I should buy... I think the quality of analysis has gone down and it’s community articles that are free like Wisdom of the Crowd I’m increasingly looking at.

        Open Controls
    3. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Don't you see a change in his play?

      Yes, of course it's a small sample size, but he's passing the eye test better now, for me at least. The data can only go so far, of course, but as a hint to how things might go in the future I think it's sometimes useful to look at small sets, particularly with positional/formational changes.

      Is it the absolute stances that are frustrating? Because again, for me, Richarlison has looked much better

      Open Controls
      1. Desperately Seeking Dusan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        I appreciate your reply Geoff (and the work you put in contributing to keeping the site working, posting etc).

        My frustration is not over Richarlison per se - although I admit this particular article caused it to bubble over because I’m irritated at myself for even taking the original article seriously given I have a degree in maths & statistics and roll my eyes at small samples and violations of conditions necessary for analysis. My frustration is more about taking a stance and then, after the player has hauled, then completely flipping to an opposing point of view! It means credibility of future articles is damaged. Just come out and say “we had this view because of X but it’s possible we have been wrong but it’s just one game”. I don’t expect people to be right all the time - I’m certainly not right all the time and in my day job aim to be right about 60-70%. It’s impossible to be correct. But if the sample is small or you’re not sure, just mention it as a possible on the Scoutcast, make it a talking point and observe how things go. I realise we’re in an instant results world these days and people want immediate answers but I think it’s better to take time to come out with a good article with conclusions that are likely - not 100% - to be borne out. I think it’s fine to speculate and I always enjoyed that from Mark and Andy (& Luke) who would throw things out there that are not consensus. But writing an article saying one thing and then two weeks later - after a good performance - saying the opposite definitely makes me wonder about credibility going forward. If Richarlison had blanked would this article have been written? It’s worse than the many players I know and see knee jerking and transferring in the weeks best performer because this is paid content.

        Articles like this are a bit of a wind up. I’d rather just a “hands up, I might be wrong but we’ll see” rather than the opposite view.

        Open Controls
        1. Geoff
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 11 Years
          5 years, 6 months ago

          Fair points, I've passed this along to the writers.

          I think you're right that it's about the nuance in articles; it's easy to make something sound like a definitive argument when what's intended is a prod for people to go look at some stats or consider something for their team. And I certainly agree that admitting when a previous stance has changed and explaining why is the best way forward.

          If Richarlison had blanked this article probably wouldn't have been written, but equally people wouldn't be talking about Sterling if he hadn't hauled. Sometimes the content has to follow the points to try to explain why they've happened. That's of course not to say that it always should as we should be trying getting ahead of the points.

          It seems to me that the line between a strong and full argument or point and speculation with an admission of the reasons the speculation might be wrong is what's underlying this. I really do appreciate that you've fully explained and gone into it instead of just getting mad

          Open Controls
          1. Desperately Seeking Dusan
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 6 months ago

            Thanks Geoff. Never any point getting mad, all criticism is fine so long as it’s constructive although I was also a bit frustrated and exasperated!

            Open Controls
    4. jtreble
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      “... so much info and stats out there for free now ...”. Almost all of the free stuff is garbage. Not worth my time.

      Open Controls
      1. Desperately Seeking Dusan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        I suggest you learn basic script or spreadsheet skills then. Opta data, all the stuff from FPL itself is freely available to import in raw format and do with as you wish, enabling more powerful analysis.

        Open Controls
        1. jtreble
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 6 months ago

          My model is based on the FPL API (https://fantasy.premierleague.com/drf/bootstrap-static). :). It still doesn't replace FFS.

          Open Controls
  22. Kuzser
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    That Maddison news forces extra moves...What option is better?
    2ft, 0.2.itb

    1)Maddison, Mitro-> Martial Jimenez (will need to play 2 out of Richa, martial and Jimenez this week then)
    2) maddison, Mitro -> Morata, diangana
    3) any other options?

    Foster (Patricio)
    RAM (wb, peltier)
    Hazard Mane(c) fraser Richa (maddison)
    Aguero Arnie Mitro

    Open Controls
    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      1

      Open Controls
  23. Digital-Real
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Maddi owners- So how many points did Maddison give you?

    4.4 PPG for me.

    Open Controls
    1. korbendallas82
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Sell him. If u want.

      Open Controls
    2. Goat
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      31 in 7 GW’s. So same as yourself

      Open Controls
  24. Jimmy Boy
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Worth -4?
    Maddison > Demarai Gray
    Mahrez > Hazard

    Open Controls
    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Absolutely

      Open Controls
    2. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      You have Sterling?

      Open Controls
      1. Jimmy Boy
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 6 months ago

        No, done with City midfielders though would rather have Hazard. Got Aguero

        Open Controls
        1. RAFA THE GAFFA
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 6 months ago

          Fair play. Do it! I’d prefer Sterling probably but understand the rotation is horrid

          Open Controls
  25. S.Kuqi
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Anyone heregetting Shaqiri for Maddison or is he just another transfer waiting to be happen

    Open Controls
    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Just look at his % of starts and you will find the answer.

      Open Controls
  26. BOATIES FC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Pat Hamer
    Alonso Mendy Lovren* Doherty AWB
    Salah Hazard Maddison* Rich Holjberg
    Kun Wilson Arnie
    1ft 0itb
    I had decided to save this week and hope Lovren played but the I'm not sure what to do with the Maddy news..
    Maddy to Anderson looks obvious but I have Arnie already
    Maddy to Fraser? Fixtures not great and have Wilson
    Maddy to Milner?
    Maddy to Pereya?
    Something more radical?

    Open Controls
  27. Desperately Seeking Dusan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    I do love how some managers can use completely contradictory info to justify their team. I'm a Haz owner but when he wasn't playing in the EL, this was great since he would be rested and raring to go at the weekend. The same people saying that now say it's great that he starts because he'll get sharpness back (after missing half a game). Basically, there are no events or circumstances that are bad for the players they happen to own...

    Open Controls
    1. Rash
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      The difference this time is hazard has barely played in a few weeks so it's more about building fitness rather than resting due to a lot of game time.

      Open Controls
    2. Mysterion
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      The fantasy world is rife with endowment effect...

      Open Controls
    3. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      I understand what your trying to say, but this is a bad example!

      Open Controls
  28. JoJoRed
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Barkley starting? What does that say about his chances of starting at weekend?

    Open Controls
    1. Sir Edo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Wont take any risk so benching most likely..

      Open Controls
  29. Demel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    This is annoying. I planned to do Mad/Fraser/Salah > Mane/Sterling/Brooks (-4) next week. And then Mad gets injured. I am not sure how I can make it work now without doing it for -8 And losing my Salah captaincy option.

    Open Controls
    1. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Mad >> Brooks and it still works surely?

      Open Controls
    2. Mysterion
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 6 months ago

      Maddison to Brooks this week..?

      Open Controls
  30. hjalmarekdal
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 6 months ago

    Who to replace Mitro & Maddison with?
    1 mdf + 1 fwd —> 13.6itb

    Open Controls

You need to be logged in to post a comment.