508 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Ask Yourself
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    What team looks better?

    A)
    ONANA
    Stones Gabriel Estupinan
    Rashford Saka BRUNO Mbuemo Mitoma
    Haaland JESUS

    Flekken CHILWELL Baldock Mubama

    B)
    Flekken
    Stones Gabriel Estupinan
    SALAH Rashford Saka Mbuemo Mitoma
    Haaland WISSA/ALVAREZ

    AREOLA Baldock KABORE Mubama

    1. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Omds I’m so sorry this made it to the top

      1. TheBiffas
        • 3 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        Genuine question - why are people so bothered about what the top post on a page is?

        1. Ask Yourself
          • 7 Years
          9 months, 25 days ago

          Just feel like this site is meant to be used for more useful contributions than my own A or B so it’s embarrassing to be seen at top of the page for one

    2. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      A

    3. One Man
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      A.

    4. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      A

      1. dunas_dog
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        * But would have 4 m goalkeeper on bench.

    5. Bushwhacker
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      A

    6. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Oh nice thanks all

  2. One Man
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    Do people use FFHub to help pick their teams ?

    1. Andy_Social
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      I do, but I find their algorithm very irritating and misleading. It's not more "scientific" than the Rate My Team here but they promote it as some kind of infallible god.

  3. OverTinker
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    I don't think Bruno is going to match Rashford. What do you think?

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      I think he could

    2. Andy_Social
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      A lot depends on what striker they bring in.

  4. Birds of Prey
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    I think this is my final Salah team. Keepers rotate for 9 gws, don't want to think about it. gtg?
    Onana/ Flekken
    TAA Gabriel Estupinan Zinchenko (Colwill)
    Saka Salah Mitoma Mbuemo ( Nakamba)
    Haaland Wissa (Surridge)

    1. OverTinker
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      3/10

    2. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Sorry but having Salah and Trent weakens team - no flexibility, needs United attack, 9.5 m too much to spend on goalies, don’t think Arsenal double defence good idea as attacking potential of mids/Jesus so high.

      1. Bushwhacker
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        All of that.

  5. Timbomars
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    Current Draft - I know the bench is absolute rats, but is this an option? Bench weakness does concern me but the starting 11 just looks so good to me! Thoughts please!

    Onana

    Shaw / Stones / Estu / Gabriel

    Mbeumo / Rashford / Salah / Mitoma / Saka

    Haaland

    Bench: Areola / Beyer / Surridge / Archer

    1. Bushwhacker
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Not having a second striker is really problematic. It's why I don't think a Salah/Haaland team works.

    2. Ze_Austin
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Shaw + Archer could be Wissa + Bell, and you have the current Haaland + Salah version of the template, which is what I have atm:

      Onana
      Estupinan Stones Gabriel
      Mitoma Salah Mbeumo Rashford Saka
      Haaland Wissa
      .
      Areola Bell Beyer Surridge

      With Liverpool not exactly looking watertight, Trent doesn't strike that much confidence with his first few fixtures. So the funds from Salah to Bruno will lead to Ask Yourself's options at the top of the page. I have a version of this in which I start with Bruno and Jesus over Salah and Wissa, with the rest of the funds ITB. Another version is the 3-4-3 with Jesus, Nkunku/Watkins and Nakamba over Salah, Wissa and Surridge

      There are some coin tosses in there, and some unknowns. There are also Trent drafts, especially in a 3-4-3 replacing Stones. There are drafts where people drop down to the 5.5s, hoping Enciso or Joao Pedro nails a spot

      There's a lot we can't know beforehand, but many will claim to have found obvious and that they were always certain (not just lucky) by GW3/5

      If you want flexibility and easy access to Chelsea lads or Trent, then Salah seemingly locks that away. Still, if starting with Salah and Wissa turns out to be such a clearly bad choice over the many other ways to spread the funds... You're actually only three transfers away: 2 FTs and -4, or three free transfers if you stagger 'em

      Your GW1 team might be unrecognizable by GW5 anyway, sometimes even without an early WC

      As for the reason I prefer Wissa to Shaw, it gives you one more likely starting spot on the bench for less money, and I think Wissa has better fixtures while being a clinical attacker leading the Brentford line for a while. Someone with two seasons of 7 goals from so few minutes might(!) take this short-term-talisman opportunity to flourish... But then, that's the bet. Another bet would be Chilwell set-and-forget until WC. I can't sit here and say how things would go for Chelsea under Poch, especially in these juicy early fixtures, but there are many reasons it could go well

      Good luck. These are some thoughts 😀

      1. Timbomars
        • 10 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        I appreciate that detail! Thanks!

    3. have you seen cyan
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      I like it.

  6. have you seen cyan
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 25 days ago

    I know people don't like booking in transfers, but you could start with Trippier GW1 and 1.5 ITB, and do Trippier>TAA for GW2. Not worth it?

    1. Ze_Austin
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Villa under Emery is one of the best teams in the league, so that's a bad fixture for Trippier

      Actually a worse fixture than Chelsea is for Trent

      1. have you seen cyan
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        maybe, but I think Trippier will do well

        1. Ze_Austin
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 25 days ago

          Not disputing that 😀

          Just purely referring to the fixture difficulty perspective, especially if it's the reason behind avoiding Trent's GW1 opponent and spending the first FT

          You're betting that Trippier vs Emery's Villa outscores Trent vs Poch's Chelsea by at least 4 points (opportunity cost vs rolling the FT or using it elsewhere). Possible, yeah. I'm not confident though

          One-fixture defensive FPL returns can be pretty unpredictable, even in the easiest games

  7. Badwiring
      9 months, 25 days ago

      All the people picking Bell for bench fodder - aren't you worried about a price drop? He's sitting on 20% ownership, I'm thinking a decent portion of that could be casuals who get caught out by the blank GW2 and drop him.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        Quite possible. Baldock has easy fixtures GW1 and 2 and is lower owned.

    • New Article
    • SpaceCadet
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Thoughts on the first Salah draft? Are the compromises in defence worth it?

      Flekken
      Gabriel estu pinnock
      Salah saka bruno mbuemo mitoma
      Haaland Jesus

      Areola bell baldock surridge

    • King Prawn
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Which looks better?
      A. Martinelli + Foden
      B. Rashford + Mbuemo

    • Stranger Mings
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 25 days ago

      Will lamperty play at Brighton?

      1. Andy_Social
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 25 days ago

        It's not looking likely. The lad's too damn fragile.

        1. Stranger Mings
          • 3 Years
          9 months, 25 days ago

          Oh I may need to change them to another 4m def

    • Woifi89
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 24 days ago

      Rmt pls

      Areola/Onana
      Saliba/Stones/Estu/Botman/Young A.
      Rash/Bruno/Mitoma/Saka/Foden
      Haaland/jesus/Woodrow

      Selection headache incoming, but for a 4-4-2/3-5-2 I'm really happy.

    • So Troublesome
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 7 days ago

      Arsenal's attacking midfield options are the best at the moment.

      Discuss.