Community Submissions

Hindsight Bias

Hindsight bias is when we believe something was easier than it really was, because we are subconsciously using information which we only found out after the event. I will give an example of hindsight bias in action.

When I asked on Fantasy Football Scout before the last round which two defenders I should bench from the following: Vincent Kompany, Nathaniel Clyne, Kurt Zouma, Hector Bellerin and Patrick van Aanholt the verdict was fairly unanimous, bench Zouma and Kompany, to which I agreed.What followed on the Tuesday was one point for Van Aanholt , and two points for Bellerin, meanwhile Zouma excelled as Chelsea kept a clean sheet against Everton. When I logged onto Fantasy Football Scout there was a discussion calling my decision strange. With the benefit of hindsight these people were criticising my decision, which at the time with the information at hand was perfectly logical. They could not see that they were rewriting history, based on information not available at the time of my decision. To them it looked so obvious after the event. The mind is a very powerful trickster

The Dangers of Hindsight Bias

It could be Fantasy Football, stock-market trading, or gambling; whatever the activity, hindsight bias can be detrimental, leading to unrealistic expectations and confusing logic with outcomes.

Allowing Poor Outcomes To Alter Future Decisions

Hindsight bias prevents us learning from the past, we become confused about when we knew things:

I will never play Bellerin over Zouma again, what a stupid mistake .

WRONG!  The real mistake is linking outcome with selection. At the time an attack-minded Bellerin at home to Leicester was the better choice, especially as we knew he was a definite starter. However, the poor outcome is likely to lead to future unwarranted bias against him. We have all had a bad experience with a captain and vowed never to use them again, not based on logic, but the pain of a bad experience

I Knew I Was Right

Hindsight bias makes us think we are better than we are, we naturally think that all our decisions that work out well were the result of great skill, while those that don’t work out, we dismiss as bad luck, leading to over confidence.

Wow, I knew Harry Kane was a better captaincy choice than Alexis Sanchez this week, I’m going to captain him every week now. 

This type of thinking just leads to over confidence, and is not based on a logical analysis of a given situation, but is merely a response to a good outcome. As they say in investment circles, past results may not be repeated in the future.

Conclusions

We all suffer from hindsight bias, it’s very natural and difficult to combat. The first step is to realise it exists, and make a conscious effort not to always link outcome with a faulty or brilliant decision. A good way is to keep a journal or blog, it helps to anchor thoughts in their correct time. For example a quick look back at the Gameweek’s captain poll shows Sanchez was, after Olivier Giroud’s non-start the massive first choice. At the time very few were interested in captaining Kane or Sergio Aguero. Some were even considering benching.

Try to keep an open mind and analyse situations on their merit and not on emotional responses to outcomes from the previous Gameweek.

Twelve years a slave <p>Four top 1k finishes. &nbsp;Only FPL goal now is to win it, so take lots of risks. If out of contention by xmas then give up, to me 10k=1M both fails so why sweat the small stuff.</p><p>Main focus these days is Fanteam where finishing position actually matters. &nbsp;Fanteam is how FPL used to be before it pandered to the casuals</p>

72 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I agree. It was like when many benched Kane against Chelsea and he ended up with a huge points haul. Given the fixtures that week and the opposition it was the sensible thing to do. Weeks on we know now that Kane is actually performing way above his price tag, but as you say - that is with hindsight.

    1. Kudo Warrior
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Agreed. This is a new "skill" I discovered this year, don't fall for the trap of this week's hero, look at the long game; I.e, don't let hindsight mess with your future decisions too much.

      I benched Kane the week after the Chelsea game because it was the right thing to do and felt right. Turned out he didn't do much and my other player got a big haul.

    2. Dier Straits
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Agreed, I benched him that week.
      We can all study stats, trends, etc., but for the most part, anything can happen.

    3. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I think Triggerlips' article has it partly right and partly wrong.

      FPL is a game of decisions and probabilities when you boil it down. And it is clear to me that many decisions made by FPL managers are irrational. The rush for Aguero in GW 22 and the rush for Sanchez in GW 25 are two good recent examples. Both of which I clearly expressed my views about before the event, so don't accuse me of using hindsight.

      In both cases, many people failed to do any basic research into the nature and recovery periods of their respective injuries. In Aguero's case many also ignored the poor fixtures City were immediately facing. In Sanchez' case many also failed to take the materially different situation Sanchez is in (with Ozil and Walcott back in the team) into account. They relied on previous FPL performance somewhat like a child with a comfort blanket.

      Aguero and/or Sanchez could have come back with a bang. But the evidence before the event was that neither was very likely to.

      Yes, hindsight bias can give a false picture. Not every poor outcome is the result of a bad decision and not every good outcome is the result of a good decision. Any poker player knows that. But dismissing hindsight can also be a convenient way to stubbornly refuse to see the mistakes you have made and learn from them.

    4. Carlos Kickaball
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I actually mentioned this in another forum over a week ago. The problem with hindsight bias, isn't that it makes us think we were right, that really doesn't matter.

      The problem is that we make up false reasons, and exaggerate the importance of minor reasons, after an event happens, then in the future we use these reasons to make predictions and greatly exaggerate the likelihood of similar events happening again.

      For example, when Charlie Austin hit a Hattrick against WBA, plenty of people captained him for his next two home games, they learnt an important lesson when they got 2 blanks in a row from their new hero.

      To be honest it's more of a serious problem in business, government, and financial decision making than it is in fantasy football. I don't mind if everyone else loses a few points because they have a new hero, but it is slightly hauling to have to read ridiculous comments about how Harry Kane is comparable to Costa, and Cazorla is as good as Sánchez. The more amusing thing is 6 months later when these comments look stupid, the people who made them forgot they even said it at all. 😆

      1. Carlos Kickaball
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Should read galling rather than hauling in last paragraph.

  2. Moin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Great Post! Agree with You!

  3. Sean
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I always put a cheeky quid on an outrageous accumulator because of this. I look at last weeks results and think "I could have easily picked those results out", when really picking 6 - 10 results out correctly is an insanely difficult thing to do, which is why the odds are so extravegent.

  4. NABIL - FPL otai
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    quality piece. I was a victim of hindsight bias - successfully captained Hazard over Costa in GW2 (GW rank of 5k), only to fail miserably in GW4 when I captained Hazard again for 4 points, while most (perhaps almost all) people captained Costa and got 34 points from him 🙁

    I agree and believe that hindsight bias poses some threat towards future decision, but not so much about lifting self confidence to the extent of being over confidence.

  5. Dier Straits
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I agree with Trigger.
    The funny part is people blaming you for your advice, they didn't have to take it, even though it was logical.
    Seems like they're just unwilling to place the blame where it lies, on themselves.

    1. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Exactly, don't think I've ever asked a question on here that I didn't have an idea of the answer. I find it better to look for reassurance or enough opposing views to change your mind

      1. Dier Straits
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Well said, it's always nice to hear other opinions.

  6. Rhinos
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Lot of posts wanting to do Cazorla to Ozil. Hindsight bias probably playing a part in this

    1. Whazza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      So I thought at first too

    2. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I'm not sure about that example though. The underlying members area stats suggest that Ozil is playing far higher up the pitch and dominating penalty area touches - this is being translated into assists and goals as we are seeing. I think that is actually an example of a forward thinking move based on a range of factors. Cazorla still has penalties in his locker but I think Cazorla to Ozil is an example of foresight bias.

      1. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        You may well be right although had Arsenal got a pen no one would bother with the move.
        Not too fussed anyway I have both 🙂

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          I wish I did. 🙂

          On Tuesday when I saw the teamsheets my choice was Sanchez or Ozil. I knew by the stats that Ozil was doing well but it was fear of Sanchez's top 10K ownership that drove me to the Chilean. Ozil will tick along nicely with assists in the coming weeks the evidence was there before.

          1. Rhinos
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            I'd always intended to do Sterling to Ozil/Theo, went Ozil purely coz costs .1 more and I had exact money due to picking Kolarov over Clyne in wc. Did it to justify that shambles haha

      2. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Foresight bias can only be a bad thing in hindsight. I'm confused 😉

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Hindsight bias is presumably based on realising that we could have made a better decision in the past if we had known then what we know now - and assuming now that we should have had the foresight then to see it coming.
          "Looking back, I could have played it differently".

          Like you, I don't really understand what Jonty means by foresight bias - I presume that he just means good foresight.

          Hindsight is a tricky thing though. Sometimes I look back at a decision that didn't turn out very well and decide that I was just unlucky, sometimes I realise that I made a bad decision, and sometimes it is difficult to tell. I try to learn from my mistakes and not to make the same mistake twice, but that is easier said than done!

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            Foresight bias is completely made up. It was meant more tongue in cheek to describe using stats to predict future trends. Some may say that using stats from the past to predict the future is a form of hindsight bias - I like to think of it as foresight bias though. 😉

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              Thanks, Jonty.

              Personally, I wouldn't call the use of stats from the past to predict the future either hindsight bias or foresight bias - I would just consider them to be an important component of good forward thinking.

              Forward planning that doesn't make use of any known facts can only be based on intuition or guesswork, but different players may base their decisions on different sets of facts and may interpret them differently or assign them differing degrees of importance.

              Perhaps forward bias is when people are more convinced than they should be that their own future plans are the only good ones and that anyone who disagrees with them must be wrong.

              Perhaps it is more a bias towards their own way of thinking. And it might involve biases towards or against underlying stats, FPL points, certain players and teams, templates, differentials, crowd think, the views of opinion leaders and so on.

              1. RedLightning
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 13 Years
                9 years, 2 months ago

                .....not to mention coverage of teams and rivals, doubling up, long and short term form, fixtures, injuries and rotations, formations, team balance, transfer values, bench strength, player ownership, risk taking or playing safe, hits, .....

              2. @ImpressiveTackl
                • 13 Years
                9 years, 2 months ago

                For what it's worth, this is what I initially interpreted Jonty's use of "foresight bias" as.

                i.e. other people's bias towards those who use underlying stats to predict future peformance instead of the more widely accepted stats (goals, assists, clean sheets etc)

                1. RedLightning
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 13 Years
                  9 years, 2 months ago

                  I was thinking more about a bias within a particular way of thinking (such as the importance attached to underlying statistics) rather than against those who think that way.

                  There is probably quite a big split within our community between those who seem to believe that underlying statistics override everything else and those who prefer to base their decisions on other factors, and both of these groups probably believe that the other one has got it wrong. There are also many different shades of opinion between these extremes.

                  I would prefer to think of it as a bias towards or away from underlying statistics, since foresight can also rely on many other factors.

  7. Amateur Pundit Zan
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Great article triggerlips. We have a lot to learn from behavioural finance that is applicable to fpl.

    Plenty of other behavioural biases happen on this site to mind you, social herding being an obvious one but also authority bias when certain high profile posters champion a player starting a stampede and price hike 😉

  8. Saint Steve-O (@EliteFPL)
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Clap. Clap. Clap.

    I applaud.... Great post

  9. Tony Warner Fan Club
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Oh Hindisght Bias, this takes me back to my economics degree.

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      More witchcraft? 😉

  10. Sharkytect
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Love this piece. It's like when you put £1 on an accumulator that wins at 100/1, and your mate's immediate reaction is 'you should've put a tenner on it'.

    No I shouldn't have. It was 100/1 odds, and i'm not rich!

    1. Black Knights
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      You win 100/1 accumulators?

      1. Sharkytect
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Once. Years ago.
        i have spent hundreds on £1 accumulators over years, though. Mug's game

  11. d1sable
    • Has Moderation Rights
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Agreed in all cases except Lukaku or Dzeko captaining (lol).....

    Jokes aside i think the over whelming captaining of Sanchez this week was quite a poor decision by many, he was just due back from an injury and was going to play 60 mins at most, Arsenal had just lost to Spurs, had played quite poorly and history has shown when Sanchez plays upfront his output is dented.

    Their decision to captain could equally be validated by Sanzhez's past returns and Leicester being awful granted, but i think that is a far too basic level of analysis.

    In any case it could of gone the other way and i would be lamenting my "over analysis".

    The logic that leads to our decisions can only be validated by a reward unfortunately....we can tell ourselves we did the right thing and anyone else in the same position given the same info would do the same but ultimately be it a lack of the right info / misinterpretation of the info or just blind luck the result is the key element. The proof is in the pudding!

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Hmmm ... 😉

    2. d1sable
      • Has Moderation Rights
      9 years, 2 months ago

      But yes completely agree that past experiences or results shouldn't have an influence on our future decisions. Each should be treated in isolation. Who knows one day Lukaku might be a decent captain choice........ too far?

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Not at all. 😀

    3. SPorting
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      In other words:

      "I captained Aguero and scraped into the top 10k....ya boo sucks!"

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Nicely put. 😉

      2. d1sable
        • Has Moderation Rights
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Ummm ok, not what i meant by it but there you go.

        1. SPorting
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Woo ha ha!

    4. Black Knights
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      This is an elaborate joke, isn't it?

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I hope so ... 😀

    5. @ImpressiveTackl
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Have to agree with you. A lot of people making poker comparisons but it's vastly different. Both contain a mixture of skill and luck but poker is a lot more interactive than FPL (FPL gameweeks are like everyone going all-in before the flop is dealt EVERYTIME because after deadline, everyone sees what the other has) and there are exact odds and probability at play at every stage of the game (pre-flop, flop, turn and river) because no two players can have the same card.

      From the moment the cards are dealt you have a distinct chance of winning. You can also fold if a hand is not going your way, imagine pulling out of (folding) a bad FPL gameweek? There is a sound decision making process in poker based on odds and probability, it's very mathematical and near impossible for a human to adhere to but it exists and if employed over a long period would make you a winning player. Yes luck comes into it but you have a specific chance of winning against your opponents hand from the moment the cards are dealt and at each stage after that, you can try to manipulate that with betting/bluffing and your odds might improve or decrease with further cards but there is still a set number of variables that could be calculated.

      FPL has no betting and a lot more variables and dare I say luck. The ace of spades can't get an injury on the flop. Your king can't concede a goal on the river. I'm labouring the point here but what I'm saying is that in FPL you can't calculate AT ANY TIME your odds of winning which makes the process of determining whether a decision was sound or not a lot more difficult and in some cases impossible. To a larger extent than in a poker game, you are dependent on the RESULTS of your play to determine whether a decision was sound or not. In poker you can simply ask did I play the hand correctly, independent of whether your opponent folded or you won the pot. In FPL it's never that simple.

      1. d1sable
        • Has Moderation Rights
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Well said, and i agree.

      2. Zasa
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Wow, great read here, very insightful. Cheers

  12. SPorting
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Weird article this.

    Will I also be allowed some to publish an article to express my disappointment at my GW score?

    And to stick two fingers up at people who doubted me?

    And to defend my own stupid actions even though I'm also a nobody with nothing interesting to say?

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Nah. You do that quite adequately on a daily basis ... 😀

      1. SPorting
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        This much is true.

    2. John t penguin
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      That's how I read it

  13. John t penguin
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    In hindsight I shouldn't have read the weather warning article

  14. Ginkapo FPL
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    "The real mistake is linking outcome with selection. "

    WRONG

    The real mistake is not admitting that there must be a way to continuously improve.

    1. Sheep
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Does putting an opinion in capital letters automatically make it correct?

      NO.

      It just makes you look like a dick.

      1. Sheep
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Now that I said this I suppose I better explain why you may not be right.

        It is impossible to know which selection will bring the best outcome prior to a GW, no matter how much we improve. We just have to play the odds continuously and over the season it should pay off.

        If you are suggesting that you can improve to a point where you can make selections that give you the optimal outcomes per GW, then I suggest you take up betting - you'd make a fortune.

        1. Ginkapo FPL
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          😀 Without ambition we will never achieve. So regardless of the truth of my statement, I am still correct.... 😉 😎

          1. Sheep
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            All the best in achieving psychic powers 🙂

  15. Ruccells
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I have unfortunately found this to be the cause of multiple panic transfers as well. There is an immediate desire to regain control of a situation, all based on one week falling apart. Plans that are laid four games ahead immediately disappear as hindsight creeps into the decision process.

  16. applebonkers
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    have to agree with some of the above, looks a bit like you wrote a whole article because of pride/ego

    1. tokara
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Agreed.

    2. Ginkapo FPL
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Have you read his blog? Thats the running theme

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        There are many websites in which the author's own team features prominently, and so does our beloved Scoutcast.

        But Triggerlips does have a great record over the past four seasons and is still number 5 in our Live Hall of Fame, so he is entitled to write with a certain amount of authority and his views are well worth reading even if we may not agree with all of them.

        Although he is currently only 16th in his own mini-league, at least ten of his followers are currently in the top thousand overall, and two of them are in the top twenty. These followers have not copied his every move, but they have probably gained quite a few useful ideas from the articles and polls in his blog.

        If I had discovered his blog sooner, I would surely have avoided some of the mistakes in my initial squad that got me off to such a disastrous start this season.

  17. Pinturicchio
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Hindsight bias is rife on FFS. A closely related problem is the Gambler's Fallacy, which I also see all the time on here.

    1. Pete Campbell
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Please expand

      1. Pinturicchio
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        People make poor decisions based on the results of their previous gameweeks and seasons — both good and bad. They will eagerly use unrelated and crazy bits of feedback to tell themselves stories about their choices, usually to their own detriment.

        There is a fixed probability about what every player in FPL will score every single week at the moment the gameweek begins. Just because we don't know it doesn't make it any less fixed. The job of a good FPL player is to make informed guesstimates about a range of possibilities, and adjust accordingly week to week. The outcome of a given gameweek — or even many gameweeks — doesn't tell you whether your choices were good or not. As an example, you can captain a cheap defender who comes off the bench because of another player's injury and scores his only goals of the season that exact week; that's an absolutely wretched decision on your part, even though it paid off. Similarly, you can captain the best-performing striker (statistically speaking, not in terms of goal haul) week in, week out to no return and those can still be "good" decisions, even though they weren't yielding the expected returns.

        When decisions are largely in the realm of luck (i.e. the unknown and unknowable), results are not the proof of your actions. You have to uncouple one from the other and focus on the available information and what you can control; you have to accept the gulf between expectations and results, because if you're playing intelligently it should average out over time. This is an extremely difficult concept for the human brain to learn — which is why most people are terrible at gambling.

        And most concepts that apply to gambling do apply to FPL. If the season lasted hundreds of gameweeks, the best gamblers would win. 38 is short enough that good or bad luck can play an enormous part in your ultimate result. But people are terrible at assessing what was "lucky" or "unlucky." Our brains aren't built for it.

        1. Pinturicchio
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          (If you were just asking what the Gambler's Fallacy is, in FPL terms it's the trap people are falling into when they say a goalkeeper is "due" a clean sheet because he hasn't had one in ages. It's inane, unless supported by data.)

  18. Twelve years a slave
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    There was a very interesting example of hindsight bias yesterday in the Englnd V New Zealand.
    The captain Morgan, won the toss and decided to bat.

    The commentators felt at the time that it was the right decision
    The betting markets thought it was the right decision as the England price shortened
    The opposing captain also said he would have batted had he won the toss
    Morgan himself obviously thought the same as he made the decision

    Then after they had been bowled out cheaply and thrashed. Morgan used the excuse that he made a big mistake with the toss. Others were in agreement he should have bowled all AFTER the event

    Morgan and co not only have shown their ability to rewrite events, but has also set himself up for further mistakes down the track. Next time he wins the toss, chances are he will bowl first, even if its wrong, simply because he believes (after the event) that he was wrong

    Conveniently forgetting the real reason England lost. They were hopeless

    1. Captain Hindsight
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      My ears are burning..

    2. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      This is different. At the time batting was a solid decision but know they know it swings they'd bowl next time, that's not hindsight bias it's learning from your mistakes. You are right though, ineptitude the overriding factor

      1. Twelve years a slave
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        It is the same, every pitch is different just like every Gameweek is different.
        It is only afterwards that all information is known.

  19. Get up ya bum
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    What a convoluted way of saying "zasa, you hurt my feelings" 😆