Opinion

The Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

With the highest score in the Fantasy Premier League last season, Eden Hazard is hot property heading into the 2015/16 campaign. At the time of writing, the Chelsea winger is far and away the most popular player in the game and is owned by an astonishing 56.9% of Fantasy managers. While the majority clearly see him as a must-have, could Hazard’s hefty £11.5m price tag be better used elsewhere? With this in mind we ask the Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

Applebonkers says…
Tantalisingly for Chelsea fans, Hazard should still be on an upward curve in his career. With the same manager in place and same team-mates around him, you’d therefore estimate at least a similar sort of output this time round.

It would have taken a price tag north of 12m to start window shopping elsewhere. Assuming Diego Costa passes the penalty baton back to Hazard after their Gameweek 38 shenanigans last season, then he remains the only big hitter in midfield with that trump card in his locker.

Essential is a word I prefer to avoid, but in a game of so many unknowns there is a comforting feeling of predictability about the Belgian.

Simon March (2014/15’s Fantasy Premier League winner) says…
“Essential” is a bit of a derided term around these parts but I do believe there are particular players that, in certain circumstances, it may too dangerous to go without. Right now, for me, Eden Hazard, falls firmly within that category.

Even if we look past the fact that he averages over 200 points a season, that he was the top FPL point scorer last season or that he is the standout performer among the reigning Premier League champions, it’s impossible to ignore his ownership percentage. At the moment, Hazard sits in over 56% of squads and he will also be a popular captaincy choice. This means that, while his ownership remains so high, the matter of whether he performs well or not will, each week, be a hugely influential factor, potentially the most decisive factor, on rankings throughout the game. I’m not sure I’d want to bet weekly against a player of that quality at those stakes.

Eventually, a broader range of high-scoring players will emerge and Hazard’s ownership figures will start to be dispersed among those alternatives. Other options will become more viable. Until then, however, the cost of owning Hazard may well be the cost of keeping up with the competition.

Jonty says…
I said Angel Di Maria was essential last year and look where that got me. If any player is to take the mantle in 2015/16 it is Hazard. The Belgian’s huge ownership means that if he scores a penalty and gains bonus points in Gameweek 1, non-owners face a potentially disappointing start to the season.

His track record is also impressive. Last year he racked up 233 points and part of his appeal was an ability to gain FPL bonus points from just an assist, goal or even his general passing play. This season, I think he can easily gain a similar total points haul, but he may struggle to match his bonus tally of 42, with passing prowess given less prominence in 2015/16’s bonus allocation.

This year his price also has to be taken into account. Last term he finished on 10.8m, which was remarkable value for his points return. He now starts at 0.7 more, while team-mates Cesc Fabregas, Diego Costa and midfield rivals like Theo Walcott are less. Can he offer the same bang for his buck at a new inflated price? This year I think there may be better value heavy hitters in the 8m to 10.5m category.

There is also Chelsea’s poor set of fixtures early on, with West Brom and Manchester City amongst their opening trio of opponents. Over the season I have no doubt Hazard will be amongst the top scorers but arguably he won’t over the first three Gameweeks.

I’ve tried drafting teams with or without him. The ones without all look better, with Fabregas allowing a whopping 2.5m to be spent elsewhere. But then I look at Hazard’s ownership, his track record and his strong performances in pre-season and that word ‘essential’ comes back into my thoughts again.

D1sable says…
Season long I’m going to have to say ‘yes’ with the current information we have. Of course Fantasy Football can spring surprises and I have learnt not to completely write off anyone, so while I’m open to changing that view, as it stands, he offers, at least for my mind, the best route into the probable League champion’s attack.

He’s still young at 24 and I can only see progression in his ability and performances. He’s 100% nailed on, started all 38 matches last season, he’s on penalties, and rarely succumbs to injury. He also loves bonus points (although with the new system perhaps slightly less), which makes him a great Captain choice.

Having said all that I’m not starting with him. His fixtures and early season form in the past have made me look elsewhere (perhaps naively) but this is mainly due to me planning an early wildcard. Would I advise anyone to follow suit who wasn’t planning on hitting the button? Absolutely not.

Evs says…
Do we have anyone else in his mold, with the exception of Sergio Aguero? Arguably not.

We no longer have a Gareth Bale, Frank Lampard or Steven Gerrard, who in their prime ripped up midfield scoring charts. The only competitor I see to him in FPL points scoring is Alexis Sanchez, who seems to share points amongst other Arsenal attacking colleagues.

Last year I went for Cesc Fabregas over Hazard to save a couple of quid. This worked out well over the first few months as both players went toe-to-toe on points. The cheaper Fabregas’ price rose, I refused to sell him and by Christmas I was left behind and was chasing the pack without Hazard, who by then had become a points juggernaut.

So for me, once bitten twice shy. Hazard is the prime midfield option and is the first name on my team sheet.

Ryan says…
No player is essential. The elite options have been priced accordingly and thus we cannot have all of them. With a budget of 100m, sacrifices will need to be made so a team cannot include all of Sergio Aguero, Eden Hazard and Alexis Sanchez plus a multitude of 8.5 – 10m options. With so much value in Arsenal’s attack, Sanchez could be dropped from that list, leaving Aguero and Hazard as two who might be considered ‘essential’. Even then, though, having both would use nearly a quarter of the budget and that will have serious implications on the rest of your team.

Going without Aguero early on might help matters but once he returns and starts a good run of fixtures in Gameweek 4 you’ll want to get him in. As a way of releasing funds, Hazard owners will be tempted to sell and it begs the question- why would you want Hazard for his first three matches, that include a visit to Manchester City and West Brom. Perhaps less funds spent on Chelsea assets might not be a bad idea to start off with.

Mark says…
Hazard is scaring the pants off me: I can’t remember going into Gameweek 1 facing a decision which I felt could genuinely make or break my season.

I’ve got nagging reservations about Chelsea over their opening fixtures and there’s no doubt that the funds liberated by omitting the Belgian can transform my squad in key areas.

While Hazard has, at times, looked effective in pre-season, Chelsea have appeared to be predictable and over reliant on his ability to break open opponents. For me, it stands to reason that Swansea will devise tactics to shutdown this avenue of attack and go all out to block supply and impede Hazard’s progress – by fair means or foul. They witnessed Arsenal’s stubborn resistance at Wembley and Garry Monk will take heart and notes from that.

Following that tricky Gameweek 1 match-up, Hazard and Chelsea go to the Etihad in a scenario that will likely see Jose Mourinho show his traditional brand of bus-based caution in a bid to smash and grab the points. Then it’s off to the Hawthorns, with Tony Pulis set to make shackling Hazard the number one priority. Everton and Arsenal follow on in the next three. In short, it’s a hugely testing start for Mourinho’s side.

That all adds up to stuttering beginnings for last season’s top Fantasy asset and, potentially, with Alexis Sanchez and Sergio Aguero active and in demand, we may even start to see Hazard’s huge ownership begin to decline, along with his price.

This all sounds convincing but the flipside is that Hazard will likely end the season as the top scoring player across the Fantasy games. Mourinho will surely find a way of protecting him, granting him space and ensuring he’s the major influence. However, given their early opponents, I’m not sure how quickly that will come together. Until then, I’m wavering.

Is Hazard essential? He is to Chelsea’s title hopes. Right this minute, he’s not to my initial Fantasy lineup.

Like I say, I may have just broken my season already.

J0E Podcaster and writer. Tweets stats and stuff via @FFScout_Joe Follow them on Twitter

4,587 Comments Post a Comment
  1. OnTheBall1617
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Please RMT.

    Ruddy/Butland

    Azpilicueta/Shaw/Ward/Richards/Huth

    Hazard/Depay/Sterling/Ibe/Aarons

    Benteke/Rooney/Lukaku

    Thanks

  2. Raheem's perm
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    First RMT. How's it looking guys?

    Myhill Butland

    Kos Ivan Huth Saylor 4.5 (Gomez/Martin/Francis)

    Walcott Ibe Mane Haz Sterling

    Deeney Rooney Sakho

    1. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Gamble on Gomez. Like the Ibe punt. Not sure if minutes with Firmano in the attacking Fray. He may end up as a wingback again if anything

      1. Raheem's perm
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Willing to take that risk on my cheapie midfielder tbh, think best option for that price.

        1. Lazarus Star
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Schneidelrin same price? Although holding so bet he gets involved. (LFC fan here so not biased). I'd go for guaranteed mins for my cheap 5th mid. You may need the points off the bench.

  3. Lazarus Star
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Who gets the most points

    Hazard plus a 4.0 defender (Targett, Baker, Saylor, Burke)
    Fab plus a 6.5 defender (Azpi, Kos, Clyne, Darmien or even find .5 more for Ivan)

    I had Fab, Silva and Darmian. Do I go Fab, Haz and Burke?

    1. Well you know, Triffic
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I'd say B, however...you may well captain Hazard alot more than you would Fab, so in that sense he'll outscore B!

  4. The Pep Revolution
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I think this is the perfect post for this question.

    Which front 8 would you prefer?

    Without Hazard:

    Cazorla Fàbregas Walcott Sterling Ritchie
    Rooney Pellè Sakho

    With Hazard:

    Milner Hazard Walcott Sterling Sinclair
    Rooney Pellè Sakho

    1. GoRedz
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I prefer with hazard and have a good feeling about milner

      1. The Pep Revolution
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah Milner could do very well.

    2. d1sable
      • Has Moderation Rights
      8 years, 9 months ago

      In both cases i think you spread the money too much unless your playing AoA?

      1. The Pep Revolution
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks for the reply. No not planning to, just want good options. I always prefer to spread the funds.

    3. Jose's Magic Omelette
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      With Hazard but get rid of Sterling and bring in Santi.

      1. The Pep Revolution
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks but I think Sterling will have a great season.

        1. Jose's Magic Omelette
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          I just think Santi has much better fixtures to start and is a proven player.

          My plan is to wait until after 3-4 games when we will have data from meaningful games to decide which Man City player is scoring highest and performing best.

    4. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      See above post. More likely to influence your defensive spend than your attacking (in my case anyway)

      1. The Pep Revolution
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        I am ok with my defence I think. To answer your question above though. I would go with Fab and Kos.

        1. Lazarus Star
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Thanks.

  5. whoracle
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

    No, he is not.

    Cech
    Clyne-Toby-Azpi
    Walcott-Henderson-Fabregas-Sterling
    Rooney-Sakho-Kane

    Subs: Hennessey-Wanyama-Huth-Francis.

    Cheers 😆

    1. Joga Bonito®
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Point not proven then.

    2. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Is this like, THE answer

    3. Herman Toothrot
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Two captain choices in that front 8.

    4. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Nice team, if you win FPL without bringing in Haz, then point taken.

    5. Pavsboot
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Nice team but with Hazard I've got exactly the same front 7 bar having Hazard for Fabregas. Personally I'd much rather Hazard and a weaker defense than Fabregas and a slightly stronger one considering how up in the air team defenses always are at the start of the season.

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Yup, i'm taking that approach as well. Chelsea defender and three rotating pairs for me. Currently on

        Casper/Butland
        Francis/Prodl
        Toby/Martin

  6. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    A: Darmian, Sterling, Anya
    B: Kosc, Mane (I've Cedric & Pelle), Sinclair

    1. BERGKOP
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I prefer B

      1. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Do you think triple SOT is overkill? I could potentially WC early so it could be a risk worth taking right?

    2. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      A but an ARS mid over Sterling.

      1. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        I've got Walcott already

  7. asmann
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    RMT

    Cech ( Schwarzer)

    Darmian Cedric Creswell Wisdom (Baker)

    Mane Cazorla Sterling Depay (Sinclair)

    Rooney Rodriguez Kane

    *******************************
    1. Pelle or Rodriguez is the main dilemma here, they have both scored the same amount of goals in preseason, although Rodriguez is back from an injury but is 1 mil cheaper.
    2. Will Cedric Start?
    3. Creswell or Rose, both have good run ins after GW1

    1. Adds04
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I would go for pelle and as far as Cedric I would steer clear of Southampton def, they were great las season but who's to say with a changed gk, both full backs, one center back and lost there best defensive mid they will be as good? It's a lot of change for me

  8. bdwhite91
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Hazard is essential imo for the first week simply because his ownership is so high. Easier to ship him out than bring him in.

    1. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Agree, easy to replace as no one higher

  9. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Am I the only one that feels that Cesc is an underwhelming pick?

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Felt great about taking him over Haz last year, this year, not so much

      1. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        We know how he fits into Chelsea's systems now and he's not going to be scoring double figures.

        1. Lazarus Star
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          19 assists last season

          1. Godot - Fashanu Zealand
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 9 months ago

            Goals scored

    2. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      First in my team. Over Haz.

  10. Bøwstring The Carp
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Reckon I'll hold onto Kun and if he doesn't play I'll have this in a 4-4-2

    ------------------- Schmeichel -------------------
    Cedric ------ Huth --- Francis ------ Kolarov
    Walcott -- Puncheon -- Hazard -- Sterling
    --------------- Benteke ---- Deeney -------------

    Alternatively I could bench Cedric and bring Lukaku/ Rooney in for Kun for a week.

    But I'd rather not account for that FT in the first week in case someone doesn't start/ gets injured

  11. BERGKOP
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Bellerin or Mert?

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Koscielny?

      1. BERGKOP
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        I'm switching between the 3 of them. The 0.5m is handy

  12. EAGLES (0 Chelsea players)
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Is there really sitewide panic on whether to own Hazard or not? just a while ago, most were saying they HAD to have Hazard

  13. PogChamp
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Interesting article. His average over the last 3 season is somewhere around 215 points and he'll surely match that this season.

    I wouldn't class him as essential as long as you're confident you can match those points for price by strengthening in other areas. No easy feat. Things are made slightly easier in that there are plenty of attacking mids as alternatives.

    For me Kun is essential. Hazard not so much.

    1. d1sable
      • Has Moderation Rights
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Its because we can safely say he will earn that amount barring injury that makes him seem essential but really its just because were reducing risk by having him.

      Reducing the risk is the name of the game if you want high finishes but in order to go that one step further i feel some elements of risk are needed to break from the herd.

      1. PogChamp
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Yep wise comment. I didn't own Kane last season and went from 8k to 100k in seven weeks.

    2. Pavsboot
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Trick is that you know Hazard will reach those heights. To match his points you have to basically know which cheaper players are going to perform which imo are much harder to pick.

      1. d1sable
        • Has Moderation Rights
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Yep harder but potentially more profitable IF you can get it right. I prefer the challenge lol

  14. Heydudes13
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Early wildcard could also mean you can fit in Sanchez before anyone else too, gotta be done...

    1. Optimus.
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      If you set up correctly you could do it with a hit,gimme a sec

      1. Optimus.
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        ...............Courtious
        .........Merte Huth Coates
        Sanchez Hazard Mane Sinclair
        .....Aguero Benteke Sakho

        Hennessey Wanyama Targett Saylor

        1. Heydudes13
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Yeah nice

        2. Well you know, Triffic
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Only issue is that I think Rooney will destroy any hopes of this plan lol.

      2. Heydudes13
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Made a team earlier that had Koscielny, Hazard, Sanchez, Sterling, Aguero and Benteke in it, amazeballs

    2. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      BY 1 GW, which is against Liverpool.

      1. Heydudes13
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        At home though

    3. Long Juan Silva
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Soared up the OR when I did that last season.

      1. Heydudes13
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        What a luxury it is to hopefully get a differential of Sanchez. We're spoiled.

  15. How Mina You
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    A) Mane + Deeney
    B) Chadli + Sakho

    And why?

    1. The Mighty I
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Tough one to pick but I would favour B
      Not sure how well Deeney will adapt to life on the PL and how man chances Watford will create, Chadli and Sakho should both repeat and have a good chance of increasing there goal and assist tally this coming season too
      Tough to leave Mane out, do you have Pelle?

  16. bitm2007
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I read somewhere that it was theoretically possible to have won FPL without Hazard and Kun last year, if you made the right moves at the right time (treble Saints defence at start of season etc). So Haz wasn't essiential, but without hindsight IMO you were much more likely to have done well with than without him.

    1. Heydudes13
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I could have won FPL if I captained Bolasie for his hattrick, Kane for his 18 point haul v Chelsea, Tadic for his 21 point haul, Walcott for his hattrick, Chester for his gw1 goal..

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Exactly

    2. Eoin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Of course it would've been possible if you made the right moves at the right time. Only problem is that would've been nigh on impossible. Having a stud in your side like Hazard or Kun limits the damage when you inevitable don't make the right move at the right time several times throughout the season.

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        As I wrote, without hindsight IMO you were much more likely to have done well with than without him

  17. Reedy
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    All I'll say is, once you've found a cheap defence you're happy with...or a good midfield enabler and perhaps a cheap third striker...you won't even consider starting the season without Hazard. Downgrade elsewhere is my advice. Anywhere else.

    1. Eoin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      This.

    2. Pavsboot
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Exactly my thoughts. Started off without, have eventually maneuvered my team around enough that I have a 11.5m hole sitting in midfield. He might not be essential but he is an excellent pick if you can get him.

    3. EddieRooo / David Brent FPL
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      This

  18. Joga Bonito®
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I'm looking at Chelsea's fixtures and I can't see many early on that I'd fancy captaining Haz which brings down his appeal. Wish Alexis was fit, just under 8% ownership.

    1. Barry Woj
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I think his fitness might have something to do with that incredibly low ownership!

      1. Joga Bonito®
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Obviously but it's also low because people are happy with other Arsenal cover where people have less faith in other Chelsea cover.

    2. Eoin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Think we're all on the 'but everyone else has him' bandwagon. There's loads of time to make up lost points if Hazard doesn't work out. It's much safer to have him at the start.

  19. Clam. ☘️
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Any leagues for top10k finishes?

    1. Long Juan Silva
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Top 10k Any Season (870-506)

      1. Clam. ☘️
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers mate. Best of luck for the season.

        1. Long Juan Silva
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          No problem. You too buddy 🙂

    2. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      How about top 100K league ?

  20. Piggs Boson
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Chelsea scored in every home game last season, and 16/19 of the away games.

    Hazard's fixtures may be unfavourable, but that won't stop him. Nothing can.

    1. SuperDunny - Used to be goo…
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      How did he do at the start of last season?

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Fabregas outscored him.

        But I don't expect every season to match the same patterns as the previous. That's crazy.

      2. Eoin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Fab overshadowed him

  21. Mobydeus30
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    try not rmt until the last week , this is the first ,the team is for an early WC:

    RUDDY (RUDD)

    AZPI KOS FRANCIS (CEDRIC,M.RICHARDS)

    OZIL STERLING FABREGAS RITCHIE WHALCOTT

    ROONEY(c) BENTEKE (IGHALO)

    many tks

  22. Sadio
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    If you don't select Hazard, who are your first 3 priority players?

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Hazard, ARS mid, Rooney.

  23. Bubz
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I like Hazard I think he's a good pick.

    1. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Controversial 😉

    2. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Seems solid.

  24. Murder On Zidane's Flo…
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Mane or Milner???

    1. BERGKOP
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Mane

  25. Hammers Select
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I think its now officially Demi time.

    Get the tab up lads

  26. teddy.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Greetings Deadzone!

    Your input on the following dilemma would be greatly appreciated:

    A) Giroud (play every week) + Andre Ayew/Lens (rotation)

    B) Ozil + Mane (play every week) + Lambert (mostly benched)

    C) Kane + Mane (play every week) + Sinclair (mostly benched)

    1. Well you know, Triffic
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Sorry I'm confused by this question. Simplify it please.

  27. reason17
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Who are the best 4.5 rated defenders? I have Francis, Huth and Coates, I need a fourth 4.5m defender?

    1. Reedy
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Bassong rotates well with those.

    2. teddy.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I like: Ward, Richards and Bassong

    3. Jimjam
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Agree with the Bassong suggestion

  28. Well you know, Triffic
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Hazard ghosted past a few players tonight, his final ball was shocking...but so was Cesc's. Swansea will be a tough game but I don't understand how people can doubt Hazard given his points history + the fact he is on pens for Chelsea. Sanchez doesn't even have pens but everyone will get him straight away....

    1. SuperDunny - Used to be goo…
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Is Hazard a better player than Sanchez do you think?

    2. Bojan Horsemack
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      His price is up, Swans are no walkovers and Man C GW2. The fact that a lot of people are wildcarding GW4 or so has a lot to do with it too. Over the season I'd be inclined to agree with you though.

    3. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      "Sanchez doesn't even have pens but everyone will get him straight away...."

      Not me. Won't come near my team unless Arsenal get a number of injuries and Wenger is forced to play him more central.

      Hazard I hope to get later on and at less than 11.5. Sanchez doesn't interest me in the slightest.

  29. Bojan Horsemack
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Anyone know how I can remove myself from a league in FPL? I don't know the administrator and I can't see a removal option...

    1. UnitedFan
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Ther should be an 'X' beside each league when you press on 'Leagues'

    2. Reedy
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Under the Leagues tab...click the appropriate x-box.

    3. ONSIDE 9
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Go to leagues tab at top of page.Should be a red x at far right of league name

    4. Bojan Horsemack
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks fellas, that did the trick

  30. arnojswfc
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Think this is finished. Thoughts?
    Courtois
    Mertesacker - Luke Shaw - Cedric - Huth - Coates
    Hazard - Walcott - Mane - Lens - Mahrez
    Rooney - Pelle - Sakho

    1. Jimjam
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Personally I'd prefer Pantilimon/Fabianksi in goal and upgrade Shaw to Azpilicueta.

      What's your formation? 3-5-2 or 3-4-3?