584 Comments Post a Comment
  1. LC1
    • 9 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Which player scores the most over the next 3;

    a) Odeegard NEW shu BRE
    b) Saliba NEW shu BRE
    c) D Luiz NFO lut TOT

    1. aapoman
      • 10 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      A or B most likely but wouldn't be surprised by C either

    2. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I have Luiz. One of the other two.

    3. The Movement
      • 2 Years
      3 months, 20 hours ago

      A

  2. The Reptile
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Will KDB feature this week? - stupidly sold Foden for him and missed his hattrick, just one assist for KDB in that time including the DGW.

    1. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      • 3 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      He created 7 chances on Saturday so he was very unlucky. Have to see if Pep says anything which is always unlikely, although maybe he'll throw us a "X is out but everyone else is fit" if we're lucky

    2. mwa1t
      • 3 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Pep said it was 'precautionary more than anything'. Could be bollocks or playing it down but sounds promising to me

    3. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Slight injury doubt. I'd hold for this one since his team plays at least.

  3. More Cowbell
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    I currently have 3 confirmed GW29 starters (Areola, C Taylor, Watkins)
    Assuming no cup upsets, using my FT's each week would allow me to get 7 starters (and I'd have to transfer in GW29 players), 9 starters with a couple of hits.

    Would you guys agree that FH29 is my best play as it stands?

    I'm torn whether to go all in on trying to building for a GW29 side, or just accept I'm free hitting which makes transfers that may better suit GW26-28 e.g. Neto/Hwang for this GW.

    Or, is there a middle ground where I take a calculated gamble and hope for some cup upsets?

    1. mwa1t
      • 3 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      FH 29 takes all the pressure off and allows you to focus on having the best team possible 26-28 and beyond. Don't think it's worth all the transfers and hits, and degrading the quality of your team, just for one GW where you can at best get 9 players

      1. More Cowbell
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        Thanks, I'm leaning this way currently. Got to commit one way or the other!

    2. Miguel Sanchez
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I've accepted I will need to FH in GW29 as I don't want to 'have to' spend all my preceding transfers on players from teams I don't necessarily want long term

    3. aapoman
      • 10 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      For me the most sensible move this week is to bring in Villa players. Good fixtures over the next gameweeks + guaranteed game in 29. You can then reassess once the FA cup games have been played between gw26-27. I'm currently planning on not using FH in 29 and building my team towards that week and then WC 30/31.

      1. More Cowbell
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        Cheers - will we know the GW29 confirmed fixtures prior to GW27?

        1. aapoman
          • 10 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Yes. We should know before gw27 deadline

  4. Gunners in Haaland
    • 4 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Am I good to go with 10 players? No hits

    Pickford
    Trippier Saliba Bradley*
    Garnacho Foden Ødegaard KDB
    Watkins Toney Haaland

    Dubravka Gomez* Palmer* Porro*

    1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 7 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Yes. Just hope KDB plays.

    2. Oz lotto
      • 12 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Ouft. I would move Gomez on if I was you and get a villa defender to set you up nicely (if you can)

  5. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 7 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Best 1 week forward for this gameweek? Hojlund the best option, or someone else?

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Watkins

      1. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        agree. Pretty good captain option

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 5 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Haaland

      1. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        I have Senesi. Hoping for a Haaland blank and Senesi goal and 3 bonus plz

    3. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Not that much in it between Hojlund/Toney/Watkins imo. But West Ham form & Fulham without Palhinha are obvious targets. I wasn't convinced by Nuno's Forest at first but since taking over they've conceded the 2nd fewest big chances in the league & have the 3rd lowest xGC. Think I'm going to captain one of Toney/Hojlund too

    4. Cojones of Destiny
      • 6 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Toney, Awoniy, Muniz if u wanna go different

    5. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Hojlund or Watkins.

  6. Tonyawesome69
    • 5 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    For me, I will target immediate gains and be flexible to chip strategy. I have exit routes with FH and WC stilll in hand.

    1. Cojones of Destiny
      • 6 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      same

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 5 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        Just feel Luiz (not overly exciting) or Bowen/Kudus (WHU poor form) aren't as appealing

    2. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I am swaying towards this. Wolves' fixture too juicy.

  7. Oz lotto
    • 12 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    I do love the content the creators put out, but there is a herd mentality like no other I have ever seen this season. If one person says it, they all seem to say it. The only guys who seem to be able to be 'real' about what they think are the general and Tom Freeman.

    1. Oz lotto
      • 12 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      the newest trend is the 'maybe we won't dead end into 29/30 and FH then'

      1. aapoman
        • 10 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        Yup. Everyone was not using FH in 29 but now that content creators are saying they are likely doing it the mentality has turned 180 degrees...

        1. Oz lotto
          • 12 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Like I said, I do love listening to them all but I was listening to a few and a lot make out like they came up with the idea de novo and like they are the brainchild... there's nothing wrong with the shift in mentality or that there is a consensus, but just say 'oh yeah Pras mentioned this'... or 'oh yeah Joe pointed this out'. - the best creators are the ones that say where the thought arose

    2. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 12 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I wonder if it's the wolves fixture this week that is turning peoples heads.

      1. Milk, 1 Šuker
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        I know Sheff Utd appear bad right now, but they did beat Wolves 2-1 in the reverse fixture. Some people have short memories.

        1. Nate(U)dog(ie)
          • 3 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Part of that was down to a scandalous penalty decision at the end by VAR

      2. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        it was the SHU fixture (in part) that made everyone go and buy Barkley and Doughty.

        1. Milk, 1 Šuker
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Indeed

      3. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        But also... Wolves have a reasonable chance of playing, so if you like them I say go for it. I think Leicester and Brighton could both win (both away but cup football could bring anything)

        1. Milk, 1 Šuker
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          True

    3. Milk, 1 Šuker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Agreed, especially when that 'one' is doing well and then they all latch on. Leads to a false 'competitiveness' in mini leagues and the wider game if managers copy the content creators' teams.

      1. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        I might go complete differential to this thought that of either WHU, AVL or WOL and get Odegaard. Next week it's SHU and Chelsea play Leeds.

        1. Milk, 1 Šuker
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          I might get rid of KDB who funnily enough I got rid of Odegaard for in GW25

          1. Oz lotto
            • 12 Years
            3 months, 1 day ago

            I have had a couple of moments like that this season

  8. AllThePies
    • 8 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    If I have 11 players but one is Estupinan, having already used my FT, is it worth the -4 to replace him as well?

    1. ButterB
      • 3 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Who are you thinking? Personally, I'd avoid taking a hit 100%. Having 10 this week is fine.

    2. More Cowbell
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I'll be rolling the dice and leaving him in

      1. Oz lotto
        • 12 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        same. this has egg on face written on it. even predicting a clean sheet gets you +2.. not worth it

    3. Wild Card this!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      It's not recommended to take hit for a defender as it usually doesn't pay back invested -4 points.
      Of course, occasionally, it does - if new defender scores etc...but rarely...
      Real question is: "Do you feel lucky? 🙂

    4. AllThePies
      • 8 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Noted, thanks all

    5. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I think so but is there not another defender you can replace who blanks instead?

  9. JBG
    • 6 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Anyone seen this or has it been mentioned here?

    https://twitter.com/TheAthletic/status/1758453670818066622

    1. JBG
      • 6 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      "A group of 50 Fantasy Premier League content creators are managing the same team via a voting system - and are having a hugely successful season..."

      1. Milk, 1 Šuker
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        If true, this needs to be outlawed.

        1. Oz lotto
          • 12 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Why? I quite like this idea...it's not like it's 50 teams built by a bot. If a group of mates/creators want to try their hand then have at it

          1. More Cowbell
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            3 months, 1 day ago

            Multi-accouting is against the rules for 1

            1. Tonyawesome69
              • 5 Years
              3 months, 1 day ago

              FPL won't do anything when they look at the CCs involved

            2. Oz lotto
              • 12 Years
              3 months, 1 day ago

              it's not strictly multi-accounting as it's not an individual as per the rules

              6. There is no limit on the number of Registrations per household or organisation. However, only one Registration for the Game per user of the Site or App is permitted. Individuals are not permitted to register multiple accounts on the Site or App.

              1. Oz lotto
                • 12 Years
                3 months, 1 day ago

                I suspect they may have even checked with FPL game makers as DQ would be devastating and embarrassing

              2. More Cowbell
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                3 months, 1 day ago

                It's collusion and makes the playing field not level for all individual players.

                1. JBG
                  • 6 Years
                  3 months, 1 day ago

                  There was a different account, that was doing pretty good, that got banned for exactly this. They where like 4 people I think, not even experts.

                  This is 50 "experts" and they are apparently in the same ML with that team, basically multi accounting.

          2. Milk, 1 Šuker
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            3 months, 1 day ago

            Well when you put it like that (sorry haven't read the whole thing)

      1. More Cowbell
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        And I suspect these are the creators given this is the only mini league that this team is in and there are 49 of them in the league, all with FPL names

        https://fantasy.premierleague.com/leagues/366/standings/c

        1. JBG
          • 6 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Well... not sure what to think about this.

      2. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        Experts team

        They took Solanke out for Darwin and hit 90 points in a TC dgw!

        1. JBG
          • 6 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          In hindsight, doing that move was poor. But Pool scored plenty goals and if not for injuries who knows.

          Can't predict 5 of the main Pool players to get injuries before and during a DGW.

  10. Sgt. Schultz
    • 7 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Rob Edwards seems to think Alfie will be ok.

    fingers crossed

    1. Oz lotto
      • 12 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      I mean... it's 28 we really want him for right? Blank then Villa who I wouldn't play him against. Hopefully enough time

      1. Sgt. Schultz
        • 7 Years
        3 months, 1 day ago

        my defender situation a bit dire. Need him fit for 27 as well.

    2. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      The Luton defense still looks poor. I wouldn't rely on him as a starter in your FPL team except for that 28 double of course.

  11. jthmt
    • 1 Year
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Defence help needed

    Gabriel, Trippier, Estu, Robertson, Gusto.

    Planning to sell Robertson but not sure to whom?!

    1. AllThePies
      • 8 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Doesn't seem too bad?

      Why would you get rid of Robbo, decent fixtures bar the City one and probably nailed. Would prioritise giving Estu the boot but generally you're in good shape.

      1. jthmt
        • 1 Year
        3 months, 1 day ago

        I have 10 for next week and very possible blank for pool also in gw29?

        1. AllThePies
          • 8 Years
          3 months, 1 day ago

          Maybe to Ake or an Arse double-up then

    2. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Rough. Robertson likely the one to go first then Estupinan. Gusto only stays due to him actually playing. Gabs and Trips are good.

      Cash or Torres if you want to avoid FH29. Saliba if you plan to FH.

  12. afsr
    • 7 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Morning! Am i G2G for this week, or take a hit for someone? Players in caps are those with confirmed GW29 fixtures (where i hope to avoid FH)

    AREOLA
    Branthwaite, Ake, Gabriel, Senesi
    Saka, Foden, Hwang
    Haaland, WATKINS, Solanke

    Dubravka, Palmer, PORRO, RICHARLISON
    0FT, 6.9 ITB

    1. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      Looks fine.

  13. Aster
    • 3 Years
    3 months, 1 day ago

    Watkins or Toney?

    1. speardrops
      • 11 Years
      3 months, 1 day ago

      For this week... difficult. Mid term Toney.

      For the next two: Watkins.

  14. Susan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 months, 23 hours ago

    Can anyone explain why I didn’t get any sub points for Jota and Darwin. My subs were saliba 6 and Douglas luis 2? I can’t find any info on it. I lost my mini league by 4 points. How desperate am I Many thanks

    1. Oz
      • 14 Years
      3 months, 23 hours ago

      I think you mean since they didn't play against Luton so they should have been subbed? They played in the previous match v Brentford which was in the same Gameweek so those appearances kept them in your team.