Selection

Spot the Differential – Gameweek 18

With less than 24 hours remaining until the Boxing Day deadline, we pause to reveal our three differentials for Gameweek 18.

We call upon a trio of big-name midfielders, all with ownership below the 10% mark and all afforded enticing match-ups over the upcoming round of fixtures.

Paul Pogba

While it’s been Zlatan Ibrahimovic who has attracted a surge in transfer traffic over the past eight days, his Manchester United team-mate Paul Pogba could also be set to flourish over the next two home fixtures against Sunderland and Middlesbrough.

The Frenchman has tallied a goal and two assists over the last five matches and is beginning to exert his influence with every passing Gameweek.

Pogba ranks joint-second among midfielders for shots on target (six) over the last four, while he’s also created seven chances over that period.

The former Juventus star is currently owned by just 9.4% of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) bosses but, setting us back just 8.3, he is beginning to look like a viable option for our five-man midfields, particularly with two tempting home fixtures beckoning.

Sunderland have generally improved at the back of late, but have still allowed five goals in their last two away trips, suggesting that Jose Mourinho’s side have to be backed to breach the visitors’ rearguard.

Middlesbrough are likely to provide stiffer resistance having conceded just nine goals in eight away fixtures. However, having shipped three to Liverpool last time out, United will again be widely fancied to find joy against Aitor Karanka’s disciplined backline.

For those unable to stretch to the funds required to recruit Ibrahimovic, Pogba presents an intriguing alternative and a powerful differential – at least over the next two Gameweeks.

Cesc Fabregas

With N’Golo Kante suspended for the home clash against Bournemouth on Boxing Day, Cesc Fabregas looks destined to earn a recall in the middle of the park for Chelsea.

The Spanish midfielder has sparkled when given the opportunity to impress, registering a goal and two assists in his last four appearances, with his underlying statistics suggesting that such output can be sustained.

Over the last four Gameweeks, Fabregas, who is available at just 6.9 in FPL, has created a chance every 35.1 minutes, while he’s registered a goal attempt every 49.2 minutes.

By comparison, Eden Hazard has only created a chance every 89.7 minutes over the same spell, while the Belgian also trails for shots on goal, managing an effort every 67.3 minutes.

Given that only Swansea City (11) have conceded more goals than Bournemouth’s nine over the last four Gameweeks, the Boxing Day match-up promises much for the 1.8%-owned Fabregas.

It is a blow that Diego Costa is also suspended, considering Fabregas’ connection with the forward, but Michy Batshuayi’s pace to run beyond the defence could allow the Spaniard to produce some trademark defence-splitting through-balls.

There are no guarantees regarding Fabregas’ playing time beyond the Bournemouth fixture, although with the leaders facing Tottenham Hotspur in Gameweek 20, he could well be retained for the visit of Stoke prior to that.

With Nemanja Matic teetering on the suspension tightrope, Antonio Conte could well keep faith with Fabregas and rest the Serbian to ensure he has options for the meeting with Spurs.

Raheem Sterling

After producing a goal and an assist in his last two outings, following seven consecutive blanks, now could be the time to reconsider Manchester City’s Raheem Sterling.

Priced at 7.6, the midfielder was a hot property at the start of the season, registering four goals and three assists in the first six Gameweeks.

Up against bottom side Hull City on Boxing Day, Sterling looks to have the ideal platform to maintain a recent resurgence in form.

The Tigers have conceded eight goals in their last four matches and, over that period, they rank second for big chances (nine) and for third for shots inside the box conceded.

City’s 2-1 victory over Arsenal should see Pep Guardiola’s side enter this match with confidence restored, with Sterling a strong contender to take advantage at the KCOM Stadium.

Rotation remains a concern, with Guardiola blessed with a wealth of options to choose from in midfield areas. However, having started in the false nine against Arsenal, Sterling looks poised to hold down that role on Humberside.

1,742 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Park the bus
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    I'm feeling sadder about George Michael passing away than I should be. Morbid coincidence to happen on Christmas Day.

    1. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      He had done great pop song but also some very credible albums

      Sad loss 🙁

      1. HuttonDressedasLahm
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        *Some great pop songs

    2. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Yeah shame this is his Last Christmas

    3. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      He died peacefully in his sleep apparently. Don't wake him up before he go-goes.

      1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Got to have faith

  2. For Fuchs Sake
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Play Pick or Grant?

    1. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      G

  3. The Hoff
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Best one week punt (before I play my wildcard tomorrow) for Costa? Have 10.7m

    1. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Tekkers

    2. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Btw you asked if I will get Kun in on WC. Not sure. I've made both drafts with him and without him. With:

      Sanchez - Pogba - Walcott - Siggy - Allen
      Kun - Costa (Dio)

      Without:

      Sanchez - KDB - Siggy - Allen (Roon)
      Ibra - Costa - Negredo

      I think I'm leaning towards 'without' atm.

      1. WVA
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I like the without but Lallana instead of Allen!

    3. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Slimani

    4. Pierce34
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Batshuayi

  4. For Fuchs Sake
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    What to do....... already made a transfer this week, worth a -4 anywhere or should I stick now?

    Pickford Grant
    Lovren Pieters Holebas Amat McAuley
    Siggy Eriksen Hazard Sanchez Capoue
    Defoe Benteke Ibra

  5. Atimis
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    think that I've sorted out everything

    Pickford
    Walker/Alonso/Holebas
    Sanchez/Hazard/Eriksen/Siggy
    IbraC/Kane/Origi

    Grant/Friend/Roon/Amat

    GTG or Friend over Holebas ?
    Cheers !!

    1. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Gtg

      1. Atimis
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks!

    2. Hansel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I have Pickford and Grant and Ibra C. Not really fond of playing my captain against my goalie though, how do you reason?

      1. Atimis
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Pickfords save points as simple as that and I think both won't keep cs but Grant will have less sp

  6. La Roja
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Peno takers with Hazard Siggy Ibra, let the diving commence.

    1. liiusions
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ibra ain't on pens

      1. La Roja
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Ibra IS on pens

      2. PvA
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        He is

      3. Fitzy.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Who is then?

  7. Jadawg
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Defoe to benteke for -4?

    1. La Roja
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I wouldn't do it for FT

  8. Are market forces ruining the game?
    Dino
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Long post alert

    I like a lot of my buddies am losing interest in the game fast.

    We got hooked because we love football and liked the idea of picking players we thought would do well due to the fixture they were playing etc.

    The game has gone so far towards a monetary one where you are blind gambling every week to maintain value and even taking out players you fancy before a decent fixture as if you don't move on a player you really want you are priced out of a move.

    The game is supposed to be fantasy football but more and more we are not making decisions for football reasons. I get it that some will enjoy this but they are the poorer tacticians imo as there were always guys taking hits and making early transfers in my mini leagues but they were easily beaten by patience in general.

    The patience advantage is far outweighed by the extra budget to be attained now. This means the more concerted manager who waited for info before making his moves has had to join these chumps that used to make the early transfers thereby negating any advantage through skill they may have had. The luck factor just seems to be increasing year on year between the price changes and the chips.

    Personally I'll play what's before me and do my best but I think the fact that the skill level is being diminished and luck/gambling being rewarded far more means that I am playing a game that leaves me with less and less control over my destiny and I am not really enjoy it.

    Anyone else feeling the same?

    1. La Roja
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Stopped reading at "losing interest in the game fast"

      1. Team Cruel
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Stopped reading at 'long post alert'. Who on earth reads long posts?

        1. Postman Ty
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          some people do enjoy reading...

    2. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      No.

    3. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      **Scrolls back to start of post

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        😀

    4. MikeDuff
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Yh

    5. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      It does seem crazy. I started playing this year last minute with football mates and then went on holiday for 2 weeks. My tv has been crap and now I find myself playing the stock market to try and get tv to get a decent squad. Only now after months of this has my tv come up to just below average.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Exactly, your making transfer decisions more due to value constraints than football reasons and football is what we love and why we play this game. I just think something had broken over the last few years.

    6. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Just because people make transfers early doesn't mean they're chumps lol

      You can still make decisions based on football. Nobody is forcing you to follow price rises

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        That's the point though, the guys making early transfers now are not all chumps. Everyone is making early transfers now because they almost have to. There are still some elite managers out there that can do it with low squad value but I would never count myself as one of those.

        Go back 4 to 5 years ago and the majority of those making early transfers were chumps and the patient players usually beat these hit heavy guys quite easily over the season.

        1. PvA
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          It's more fun if you ask me
          I didn't play 5 years ago, but more transfers = more decisions = more fun

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            Exactly, you think it is more fun but you are gambling that these early transfers (and possible point hits?) will pay off but there is no opposing strategy any more to beat you. With all your "fun" transfers the market is being driven wild and you are gaining huge value advantage.

            The more strategic manager is left to make blind punts on a sat night as to what lineups might be like the following weekend and I don't think they find it "fun" as there is very little skill in it.

        2. Mark
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 17 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          We've had to change our strategy for sure. I've acted quickly in the market but I've also shown patience in some areas. I've held Hazard and Walcott for weeks ahead of this forthcoming spell for example. At the same time, I reacted quickly to go Eriksen in for Firmino and I felt forced to get rid of Kane for Ibra this week.

          So I've mixed it up - I've backed my judgment with some players, but reacted to form quickly with others.

          I totally agree that, in the past, it's been far easier to hold and wait for class to outscore temporary form but I just think that's not worked due to the way the season has panned out.

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            You say strategy but if you think back 6 years ago or so you wouldn't bring in Ibra sat night with 8 days of training to come. This is not football strategy and it is not part of the strategy that got us addicted to fpl in the first place (imo).

            We are hopping from a to b, taking hits and hoping for the best now. This is luck not strategy and I don't think the game is the better for it.

            Happy xmas btw mark

    7. Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I am not sure whether it is the price changes which have reduced my interest in the game this season. Historically I have identified my changes for the week and make them as late as possible in the week without there being a price impact.

      I just have found it a very frustrating season and the fact FPL tweet every man and his dog with snippets of information you used to get here doesn't help.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        This is another huge big bear. Giving out all the info a football addict fpl manager would fain by watching matches and studying stats for free to the masses takes away a huge advantage for the more serious managers.

        1. Cheeseoid
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Yup. It takes a "a casual" very little effort to identify transfer targets now and that is one of the reasons why the prices change on some of the more punty players quicker than they used too. If more people know about them then more buy them earlier and their prices change sooner than they would have previously.

      2. Qubit
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Yeh, but to be honest thats how ive always felt about places like this, making planning ahead etc etc and how to play the game obvious to all (i much preferred it when you had to figure it out for yourself), or worse the best targets are now freely available to anyone who has even the vaguest grasp of google, this next step is just the next logical one from FPLs point of view.

        1. Qubit
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          With the info on which players make the best targets available easily in many places, it makes straying from the accepted captain or even team very dangerous to your rank, if the collective do badly you do badly, so thats ok, small differences can still result in rank changes.

          However, if you stray from the path and your captain fails and the popular one succeeds then you will suffer hugely, to some degree the same applies to team choice. This will only get worse over time as FPL increases in popularity. I believe in time it will make regularly doing well almost impossible, even for the likes of Ronka etc.

          1. Qubit
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            This also leads to a higher degree of rank compression, which i think is evident to some degree this season - particularly with the introduction of the chips as well (which can serve to skews ranks until all chips have been played).

            This means you should still be able to make good ground when the opportunity arises - the key is not to panic. The game has changed in many ways, some by design, some as a result of how many now play it. I guess its up to us to try and respond.

    8. CatMac
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I think the problem is that more people are playing fantasy football and more people are now tuned in to FFS.

      I must admit I am not particularly a follower of club football, mostly internationals. But since I started playing this game about 8 years ago, I watch the Premiership matches so that I know how my players are doing. I do it for the buzz of winning my work mini league.

      It wasn't until about my third year of playing that I realised the importance of team value. Now I am guilty of doing as you mention, changing out a player with a good fixture just to get in one I want more and who has form. Also I am guilty of bringing in players that others on this forum recommend as they normally have a higher rank than me and seem to know what they are talking about.

      I think the big problem this year is that with so many participants these days prices go up and down so quickly that if you don't react fast you lose the chance. That's what I have found anyway.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Maybe, I'm not sure it is just the extra people but a good portion is alright. I just think a lot of the strategy has been stripped as we are all making blind punts time try and keep our value up.

        1. CatMac
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          I'm not so sure. A few years ago on here you never used to get the endless conversations about what is your SV and TV or so many people ranked 10000 or less.

          Now just seems to be an endless competition to have a better team value and rank. I'm not saying it is necessarily a bad thing, it's just changed the game.

      2. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        See below Catmac...if there were more consistent heavy-hitters and there wasn't a constant steam of different big-scoring assets then the market would be calmer. Plus we have to remember that Aguero hasn't been around to keep things more stable.

        With Aguero scoring every week and our main captain option, we wouldn't have to concern ourselves with Hazard, Sanchez, Ibrahimovic to the same degree. But with Aguero gone, we have little choice but to act early to cover these options.

        I think the circumstances of this season has just exposed the price rises as more of an issue. It's made them more volatile and it's made it far more difficult to keep faith with assets and ignore short-term explosions of form.

        1. CatMac
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Ah, cheers Mark. I read this after I posted below ;

        2. Nay
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Thanks Mark!
          The another factor is that FPL started awarding individual GAME WEEK prizes this season and more teams are aiming one week punts and taking hits. They open gmail accounts, then register teams as they like and making very early transfers without thinking about long term prospect. FPL should not award individual GW wins especially with their CHIPS system. We have seen that most of the teams won GW prizes used their CHIPS. More teams are playing for a game week rather than for a season. I also really do not understand why they make qualification for FPL CUP depends on a Game Week score (GW 17) rather than on Overall rank. That is crazy and many dead teams qualified for the CUP but many good and experienced teams did not. Please advice FPL regarding about that Mark. Thanks!!

    9. Qubit
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Yes and no. Yes, but this years transfer market is not the worst its been, a few years back it was actually just as bad with rapid changes and they were forced to change it the following season (when everyone then complained about lack of price changes).

      They will almost certainly make a change again for next season.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah as I say it hasn't been fully right first 4 or 5 years imo

        1. Neeskens Under Matip
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          I don't think it's that bad? Main difficulty is, I have to make my transfers on the Saturday / Sunday when the games are played, rather than pontificate until the Friday before...

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            It's not as simple as that though is it? Because the game is the way it is now we end up bringing in players like hazard even though the fixtures are not good instead of waiting for the good run of fixtures we had strategically earmarked to bring him in for. People glibly say you have a choice but you don't really imo, you don't get hazard and you risk paying 0.5m or more for him 4 weeks later when you do want him. Do this across 5 or 6 positions and you are effectively killing your chances unless you are ready the kasparov of fpl.

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              7 years, 4 months ago

              Gary Kasparov was World Chess Champion from 1985 to 2000, but the current World Champion is Magnus Carlsen.
              Times change in both chess and FPL, and we have to change with them.

              1. Get up ya bum
                • 14 Years
                7 years, 4 months ago

                Such legends, both. Carlsen is a freak. Hit the highest ever rating beating both Kasparov and Fisher when he was barely an adult!

              2. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                7 years, 4 months ago

                The point is we don't have to change with them. Either we change with them or fall our of love with the game and it dies a death as so many fantasy football games have in the past (anyone remember cyki?)

                Bit over dramatic? At this stage probably but who knows down the line?

                1. RedLightning
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 13 Years
                  7 years, 4 months ago

                  Each season sets new challenges, and we ought to try to adjust to them in my opinion. Some ways of playing, that work perfectly well some seasons, are less successful in others. The game is constantly changing and no two seasons are the same, which I think adds to the interest by setting us different challenges.

                  I prefer to accept the game as it is and try to adapt to new circumstances, although it isn't easy and I certainly cannot claim to have mastered it.

                  There are many different ways of playing this game, and I don't believe that we have the right to demand that FPL gives our preferred method an automatic advantage over others. It is up to us to decide whether the time has come to adapt our preferred method if that is what is required to bring success. I also think that the game is not just about who has the deepest understanding of real football, and we ought to accept it for what it is.

                  1. Dino
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 14 Years
                    7 years, 4 months ago

                    If you come down off your pulpit for a minute and listen to and read my comments you will see that I have said we have to adjust but it is a fantasy football game and when the adjustment favors blind gambles on a Saturday night over waiting to see at least who is fit for the weekend in our own squads never mind trying to take advantage of a weakness through injury in an opposing squad then it had gone away from being a football manager/strategy game and it just becomes a gambling game where luck is the single biggest factor (imo*).

            2. Spreadsheet
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              7 years, 4 months ago

              I don't agree with this. For example, I've not brought in Hazard in recent weeks - he's not passed the eye test for me, and doesn't look like value. I knew in not getting him, that I might not be able to get him later on either - but the beauty of FPL is that if I don't get him, I can get someone else in. The same last year, when Vardy was on his recordbreaking goal scoring run. I didn't get him in at the start, and chose not to get someone else in later. I just had to find a way to match his points elsehow. It's all part of the challenge. 0.5 is not a drastic sum of money in the grand scheme of this game, so I think you can still make decisions without factoring in pricechanges.

              (Apologies for dragging up an old post!)

    10. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Do you not feel that the events of the season itself have contributed?

      No Aguero for any meaningful spell. No cheap options matching the heavy hitters as Kane did 2 years ago and Mahrez/Vardy did last year. Only Costa as the consistent heavy-hitter.

      This has been a very different season and I think that has driven the market.

      I agree that we're being driven to transfer earlier - I've felt that but that's because patience hasn't paid off - not due to anything FPL has done but just how the season is working out.

      We haven't been able to sit on 3-4 stable heavy hitters and wait for them to hit form because alternatives have come along and hit points in bursts.

      Eriksen was the latest, hit 18 points, alerted the masses then did it again in the next home game. If you sat on Firmino for that, you got punished. That wasn't the market or FPL tweets to blame, that was just Eriksen exploding in back-to-back home matches, feeding those who jumped on the early bandwagon points.

      If you've been adopting a patient approach in any other season, you'd probably be far better off, it's just this season, that approach hasn't worked - I've felt we've had to constantly update our chosen heavy-hitters according to transient form.

      Yes, that has driven lots more folk into the market and that has led to more price rises. Is that down to the algorithm or just the fact that a) there's no Aguero to suck out the money and b) there is just a constant flux in the form heavy-hitters.

      I just don't think we can expect a patient strategy to work every season and then blame the game when it doesn't.

      Although I agree, I think the price rises are an issue and more so this year because of the fickle nature of the season.

      1. CatMac
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I agree that much of the problem has been that the heavy-hitters haven't performed up to expectations, especially in the first few weeks of the season.

        I have had to do transfers on a Saturday/Sunday this year whereas in previous years I have waited until the Friday, purely because I am more conscious of team value than before. Is that now not as much to do with the number of people now playing as with strategy? Not because of anything FPL has done but due to the way it has evolved.

      2. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah I agree with most of your points Mark to a certain extent.

        I don't think it is just this season though. I've been feeling pushed more and more into making early transfers (and taking hits which I never used to do) this past 3/4/5 seasons tbh and I just think the tactical pull of the game is being compromised far too much. This is after all supposed to be a football strategy game where football knowledge is rewarded first and foremost.

        As I posted in reply above if we are all pushed into making early transfers then those that used to get punished for these early transfers and excessive hits are free to mingle and gamble with impunity in these ranks. If we don't join these players we are basically laying with one hand tied behind our backs.

        Ps every season is different tbf (last season was one of the strangest ever) and I understand it must be incredibly difficult for fpl to cater for both ways to play the game.

        1. Mark
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 17 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Yeah, I've always felt that price rises are too big a factor - I've argued for many seasons.

          I've said previously that I think I've felt I've had to manage things far more this season - not just the prices but also anticipating and reacting to form.

          Look at Kane - I could hold him but I know that Ibra has the form and fixtures to punish me. I also know that one is rising, the other likely to fall. To an extent the market is a factor but, had Kane scored in one of the Hull or Burnley matches, I wouldn't be selling. Kane's form is the key factor. I just don't feel I can afford to show patience given Ibra's potential and ownership.

          Same for Firmino and the recent trade to Eriksen. One has slumped, the other exploded.

          We also saw Sterling do the same, peaked and then died. I held him too long and paid a price.

          Same for Hazard and Sanchez recently. One slowed, the other exploded and I lost out. Yes, the market drove me to act fast but that was down to events on the pitch.

          A patient approach has just been found out and a more fickle attitude and fast reaction to bandwagons has paid off.

          Those tactics are normally associated with casual managers and therefore they are seen as being more successful this season.

          We've had to adjust but, as we do, I think we'll see more of us start to make up ground as a result.

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            OK last post for the night.

            I agree with a lot of that tbf but I think the early transfer mob have been having an effect for a lot longer than just this season. Even last season when value wasn't as important if you had little money in the bank and planned a transfer and a player highlighted himself he was likely to rise early forcing is into moving on the target or let them go.

            Another huge element of the price rises is for those that got on Costa this season (there are usually more as you point out) and he had risen more than a million. These managers are going to be very much tied into him for the rest of the season now unless he gets a long injury or dramatically loses form. I've found in the past that the second half of the season had been boring due to having so much value tied up in players and only being able to change the odd player or two in the squad. This is a different problem ofc and maybe for another day.

          2. LFC466
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            I for one am shocked how an 11M striker who spends half his time playing in midfield and who barely gets 1 sib per game can prove to be a bad pick...
            lucky casuals

            1. Postman Ty
              • 9 Years
              7 years, 4 months ago

              Please tell me more about how this Goldenboot challenger is a bad pick.

          3. TopMarx
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 11 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            I remember reading an end of season article which looked at the point thresholds for places, I remember it concluded that now you have to not only pick the best FPL scorers over the course of the season but do so when they are in form. I think the article said that if you had picked the overall best points performers for a season (and made no transfers from week 1) you still wouldn't have made the top 10K! (I think I've remembered that correctly). This trend is increasing with each passing season, I feel it's particularly exacerbated this season with the fluctuating form of so many big hitters. I will try to find a link to that article.

      3. Konig Luther
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        was about to say the same, until i read this. Agree

    11. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      It's not making me lose interest but it does annoy me a little bit.

      Part of what settles me is that I am convinced that TV/SV is nowhere near as big an advantage as many make out.

      There was a January to May FFS league last season. Last December (GW17 or so) I took over my nephew's team for a challenge. It had a TV of 96.7m and an OR of worse than 3m, had already spent the TC chip and had never made a single transfer, a proper dead team.

      That team won the FFS January/May league and rose from 3.1m to 440k with a budget around 8m less than what was typical. OK, last season was a bit different because budget didn't matter so much with so many cheaper enablers. But it makes a point nevertheless.

      If an experienced manager doesn't want to play the price game they just need to find some efficiency wrinkles to cope with a TV that may be 1.5m lower or something come DGW time when we (most) wildcard. Part of what I am finding interesting about this season is the challenge of doing exactly that. Because no way am I prepared to become a bandwagon-hopper or to chase TV as a 1st priority.

    12. LFC466
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Not in the slightest, I see no skill in being able to pick a WC team in week 4 safe in the knowledge that 7+ of the consistent starters will be with you in week 34. For all intents and purposes that is what fpl was last season and to a lesser extent those that preceeded it, quality ranks being mostly attributable to nothing more than circle jerking on forums like this.

      This season you have far too many elite players to fit into a single side, there are a plethora of mid priced midfield options and the cheaper options look tantalizing at times but none of them have had the consistency to gain hegemony. All of this forces players to make actual decisions based on a wide-ranging football rationale which has generally rewarded good a priori decisions and punished bad ones.

      Vis a vis the price changes I would like to see FPL strike a balance where both agressive value building and placid confidence in ones team are legitimate strategies equally likely to lead to success. The thing is though at this point no one has any idea how successful either of those strategies will be as a high team value is only significantly beneficial in the 2nd half of the season. Any players like Ibra, Sanchez, and Costa who's price changes have posed impositions on the completion of teams to date have reduced down to purely football decisions with the price changes being gravy helping the players who made the best decisions. The short lived bursts of transfer activity of players who have gained value for certain players but have not represented good non-price decisions i.e. negredo, kane, sterling have not affected the game yet which gets us back to the fact that the best decisions have led to the best ranks so far.

      most of the time "lucky" and "casual" just refer to people who have based their decisions on reason and evidence rather than group think and fear
      Best season ever.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        +1 just for managing to get the word "hegemony" into a comment about fantasy football. 🙂

      2. Postman Ty
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        The second last comment about 'lucky casuals' referring to individual think is complete bull crap. We talk about 'casuals' as the ones who check their team once or twice a week (instead of every day), pick players like Kante who have absolutely no business in FPL, don't watch very many games, and generally don't 'do their homework' when it comes to decision making. These are the players who bring in their personal favourites over better picks, follow trends like 'he's scored two weeks in a row so he must be fantasy gold', or blindly pick a name they heard someone say was good.

        'Lucky' are the one's who always get unlikely points off the bench, points where the stats suggest otherwise (whether it be from a poor fixture, management, or form), or silly captain punts that work out. There's nothing wrong with a good punt, but when half of your team look like punts, that's typically the sign of a casual, and if they're doing good then they're plain lucky. For every lucky player there's a ton who just end up crap. But every time we see a lucky player do better than us it's frustrating (and that obviously includes good players who get lucky). The only caveat there is we have to accept when we get lucky, and not think that a decision that worked out makes us FPL manager of the year.

        1. LFC466
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          ambiguity
          ambɪˈɡjuːɪti/
          noun
          noun: ambiguity; plural noun: ambiguities

          the quality of being open to more than one interpretation; inexactness

          Used by certain people in certain contexts those may be the intended definitions, however, they are commonly used simply to smear those who make decisions decisions different to them, especially when those decisions pay off. Kneejerker is another classic example. I found it very amusing as someone who had coutinho for week 1 to see all semblance of objectivity thrown out of the window by those later punished for refusing to consider anyone who bought him up to that point as doing so for any other reason than "his 2 lucky goals".

          1. Postman Ty
            • 9 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            Fair point. Well that's how I use the terms anyways. I hope that's how 'most' people use them.

    13. tisza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      a lot of strange/new things this season.

      1. just the huge number of people playing the game
      2. a lot of players have contributed pts in bursts rather than consistently which seems to have led to a lot of knee-jerking or different approaches.
      3. people are looking at OR and seeing large numbers but not necessarily looking at the pts spread separating them from higher ranks.
      i've had a shocking run from 270k to 985k in 6 weeks. Last week i had a provisional rank of 770k then Can came of the bench for a cameo leaving De Roon 10 pts on the bench.
      That last 5/6 minutes of the gw saw me drop 200k OR.

      But at 985k I still only 35pts off 500k and 92pts off 100k.

      4. Sometimes patterns just don't make sense. Kane dropping .2m this GW whilst about 100k have bought Lukaku in.

      5.Clean sheets have been ridiculously difficult. You'd expect many more from top sides like Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool. How often have they been winning games 3-1,4-1 etc. giving away silly clean sheet points?

      6. Maybe people have just tried to get too many big hitters in at the expense of weakening other parts of the team. WHen the big hitters don't come off it really bites.

      I do watch the mods league just to see what experienced players are doing. Last GW i knew i'd had a nightmare with 40pts then checked the mods league and most of them were in the 40s.

      Game's not easy this year which makes it more frustrating but also more interesting. No point it being easy just drifting through the season, letting FFS posters pick your side for you and picking up top 1% finishes.

    14. Numb
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Yep, spot on. Seems like every other post on here is about "Player X rising" or "Player Y" falling.

      1. Numb
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Also, as you say, you are pretty much forced into making transfers (and often more than one) before the current GW is even finished, if you don't want to be priced out of a move or fall behind in team value.

    15. Netley Lucas
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      People will rationalise, but you're right. Being forced into stupidly early changes is crazy and is harming this game.

    16. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      This is something I've spoken about many times before.

      This season in particular has been driven by the volatility of the market and for me, a patient Ronka-esque manager, it has made it less enjoyable.

      I do hope that a change is made to the pricing market. People still like to have a market and I accept that but restrictions on rises and falls would focus the game more on the search for points not £££.

      There are certain elements to this season though that are different and out of FPL's control:

      There are too few mid price or cheap strikers that are performing well.

      The heavy hitters have let us down too often.

      Midfielders are now strikers.

      I think though with so many managers changes are needed.

      A slower transfer market ( or restriction of no more that .2 either way each week)

      Fpl has been slow to react to the trend of mids playing as strikers. FanDuel and sky for eg list Sanchez as a striker - which he is.

      Final couple of points.

      First, It's interesting that in sky, where there are only 40 transfers a season, patience still pays off. It's no surprise that I'm enjoying that more.

      Second, as a patient manager I've been caught out be being forced out of my comfort zone. From now on I've decided, as I said on the scoutcast, that I'll play it the way I want rather than how the market of the remaining 2.5m managers wants. That will probably mean failure but at least I'll be on my sinking ship on my terms.

      Worth noting that last season the winner of fpl was a novice in his first season who didn't follow stats, fixture or form - just 'his gut' - which I guess shows that the dominance of luck over skill is not something that is new to this season but is possibly the shape of things to come.

    17. Lateriser 12
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I like people running behind the market players.

      Makes it easier to buy a differential advantage.

    18. George Costanza
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I agree that it is a bit annoying but I am still in love with the game. I had to act quickly on Ibra last weekend because I had exactly the right amount to move Kane out for him. If this were a couple of seasons ago, I'd surely have waited until before the new gameweek.

      It is an evolution in the game but it's still class and it remains the case that the more astute players still prevail. The cream always rises to the top.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I simply don't agree with this as of we are all masking decisions sans important information re our squads or opposition squads then it is the people who are the luckiest that win. When we could take our time and digest all the press conference info, injury info etc etc those strategic players were able to offset the luck to a much bigger extent.

        1. Business Cat
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Captain choices are pure luck and have way more impact than the market.

          Would you ditch that?

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            Again not my favourite part of the game but no I wouldn't ditch it as it helps with the mass market appeal to have this lucky element I think. The luck can at least be somewhat offset by doing a bit of research up until the deadline which should allow an experienced manager to make the optimum pick more often than a casual player.

            Would I recommend having to lock our captain in by 12 midnight on the first day of the gw? Definitely not as we wouldn't even know if our captain and vice captain picks would be fit for the following Friday. This is the crux of my argument really and I don't think all the early transfer peeps would like to have to be locking in their captains day one either.

            Ps I'm not sold on the chips as a positive thing either but I'm holding judgement for a year or two until we see how they work.

            Pps I really hate the idea of having to use one wc pre Xmas and one post Xmas also. All these chabges seem to be a constant attack on the strategic long game players tbh

      2. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        .....and then the cream would rise to the top.

    19. Gangster Panda
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I'm also of the "it's a bit annoying, but still love the game" camp.
      I've never realistically expected to be able to wait until Sat am before committing to my transfers, my sv/tv used to be something to keep an eye on from about Mon onward but feeling the pressure to transfers on the basis of +/- value before gw's are even complete does take a little of the fun (& add to the dread) to the week ahead.

      Fpl feels like it's leaned more toward value management than team management. I'd like to blame intravenous fed fpl stats/tips and the bonus points structure but it is what it is & the playing field is even. Just rollin' with it in anticipation of what's in store for next season. Happy St. Stephen's Day everyone.

    20. Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Hi Dino,
      My take is this.
      In the past you can wait a bit and suck up the 0.1m difference in price before making the transfer.
      In that time you can read all the excellent articles on here and other web sites and then make a decision.
      This season you have to work more out by yourself and make transfers with less clues/articles which in some way i think is better.
      The problem I think is the prices of the players are sooo high this season and no consistant budget options have come through.
      I am happy with ten players of my team but cant get enough funds to buy a decent eleventh player.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I think having to make your own mind up would be fine but you are been asked to do it without ANY information and possibly before the players in question have even played.

        It definitely levels the playing field as it hugely reduces the advantage of the strategic players. (Please don't give me the whole building value is a strategy either as I am talking football strategy).

    21. Business Cat
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Holy crap this post is long!

      Without pouring over all the replies, I actually LIKE the market forces and wish they were a bigger part of the game.

      I hate "template teams"...nothing makes the game more boring than that...everyone clambering to be the same.

      If market forces created natural ownership caps, preventing everyone having Costa, Sanchez, Hazard, Alonso, etc. in the same team at the same time, diversity would be enforced to some extent.

      There's nothing worse than last season when virtually 100% of active players had Mahrez, Vardy, Alli, Ozil...the cheapness let everyone off the hook and removed the element of strategy.

      I'd like to see diversity rewarded more and transferring wisely rewarded...ideas:

      - the captain pick doesn't mindlessly double your score. If you go with the herd and back an obvious captain backed by 30-40% of others maybe you only get a 1.5x multiplier...pick a left-field pick who brings home the bacon captained by only 2%...perhaps you get 2.5x or 3x

      - any player you transfer in gets a special first-week bonus multiplier (say 1.5x)...if your newly transferred in player does well...rewards for you! Will encourage people to study form, look at the fixtures...not transfer in to build team value or game the market forces.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Some interesting ideas there cat.

        Not sure I agree with your market forces mean we don't have template teams. I'd argue teams are more template due to market forces. People can't afford to not get in the hit players in case they remain consistent so everyone has to rush to get them in immediately which creates template teams. If managers want to bide their time and show patience with a player they get priced out of a move for the alternative "hot" player so people can't afford to go away from the template BRCAUSE of market forces.

    22. Legomane
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I'm enjoying this season immensely despite an awful start. Transfer market adds a lot to the game imo, almost all positive. The only change I'd like to see would be freezing prices during a gameweek. It would be good to let every one play before rises and falls kick in. A move which might also appease some of the moaners on here 🙂

      At the end of the day, any transfer made is a risk. Early movers might gain a little TV, but sacrifice gaining further knowledge before pulling the trigger. Personally I'm quite happy to make transfers while match of the day highlights are still fresh in my mind as it is when my gut feel is strongest having gone through the eyeball test. Normally I'll wait till after CL/Europa if I'm worried about particular players (e.g. Austin), but it's all just part of the equation:

      risk + judgement = [success or failure] + / - [TV]

      1. Business Cat
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I would actually be in favour of player value updating once per week, after the deadline, rather than every night.

        That would preserve the market...calm it down...stop some speculative chattering on here about price rises and fix virtually everything Dino's moaned about.

    23. Baines on Toast...
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      so many of these arguments never seem to come down to the fundamental point:

      This cannot be held as in issue if you are just losing team value through your patient approach. Because rank isn't decided by team value.

      So the question is, is your potential to achieve more points and a high overall rank being hit by market forces? As someone who transferred out Hazard, Sanchez and Ibra, all in line with market trends and all before massive explosions, I suspect that a patient approach would have been far more beneficial.

      Until I see concrete evidence of the VALUE of value, so to speak - and the only real look at this was I think by Ruth (apologies if wrong) a couple of years ago - then you are all just getting overstressed about a non issue. Markets are irrational, yes.

      I think a quote from Kipling/fellow manager Mike Bassett may be of use here. It starts...

      'If you can keep your head when all about you
      Are losing theirs...'

      1. Business Cat
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        The last time I can remember team value having massive effect was 4 years ago (I think)

        I can remember romping my mini-leagues because there were a lot of massively consistent heavy-hitting premium options up front and in midfield doing it week-in, week-out...whoever had them all, won.

        I got to £112 TV that year if rightly remember...you had 12m Van Persie and 11m Suarez up top, 10.5m Bale, 10m Chelsea Mata in his pomp, and a load of other 9-10m players in there...that might've been the Michu year...I think.

        This season isn't like that season at all. Yes, you need premium options for the most part...but they're not consistent, you need to keep swapping them, and there's eay more

        1. Business Cat
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          ...way more mid-price options

    24. Clump
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I quite like the price volatility, though wouldn't let rises & falls be the chief motivating factor with transfers.
      Decent HT this, lots of interesting opinions.

    25. Tinzelbat
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      This is the worst post I have ever read on this website. If you don't like the game anymore don't play do something else don't make it out the game is awfull probably because you are so low down the rankings. I learn to adapt and I haven't been outside the top 7k since gameweek 2

    26. _Freddo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Stop whinging, everyone has the same conditions to work with, play the game or don't, if you don't enjoy it walk away.

      No need for long posts bringing everyone down.

      The 'fun' of the game is testing yourself against different challenges every season, if you don't enjoy testing yourself then move on to something else.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        For the two previous posters, this is not whinging it is trying to open a constructive discussion on the direction the game is going.

        I love fpl and want to be taking part in 10 years time as I have done for the last 8 or 9 years, but I can see it going the way of the likes of cyki if it keeps going the same direction.

        I will likely walk away if we get another season like this next season and maybe I'll be the only one but I doubt it. I'd say I am more likely representative of a decent number of veteran fantasy football managers. I used to set up and take part in mini leagues fir years but the last 3 or 4 seasons more and more of the experienced players are giving up saying there is too much luck involved in the game.

        Ps my own rank doesn't really come into whether I enjoy the season or not as some of my most enjoyable seasons have been when I've had a poor start and was able to claw my way back.

    27. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      plus how can you moan about this season, its the funnest i can remember, every so called big team is performing thus giving us so many more expenisve explosive options.

    28. FPLzebub
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      This is the best season ever (not personally, it's my lowest ever ranking) largely because the volatility in the transfer market means taking hits is a much more viable option. I hate seasons like the last one where the template lasted forever and if you didn't get off to a great start you had no chance of catching up. The guy currently leading my mini-league has already taken 164 pts worth of hits.

      It seems to me that the people who are complaining are those who don't like change and who lack the creativity to adapt to the new environment. Adapt or fail; and stop whinging.

      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        football wise it is a great season but if you think there is any great skill in gambling with his prior to having any team info then there is no taking to you.

        This game always had a luck element to it but skill usually outweighed the luck over a season. Due to having to make transfers so early in the game week with all the people who used to do this anyway the skill element counts for too little now imo.

        We always had one or two lads in a mini leagues that would get lucky with an early transfer, hitting strategy but it would fail for the majority of people as it relies too much on luck. This season and more and more over the last few seasons we are all being pushed down this route so the advantage strategic players had over hit happy transfer happy players is gone.

        Ps I hated last season too but that was more circumstances than fpl fault.

        Thanks for the constructive input to the debate, shows the measure of a man.

  9. Sif
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Origi > Tekkers for an FT?

    Origi might not make 60mins and Benteke has a new manager to impress.

  10. FirminoIsBetterThanYou
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Who to captain- Hazard-BOU(H) or Ibra-SUN(H)?

    1. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ibra has form, but sunderland likely to park the bus.

      Hazard out of form fpl wise, but playing in a more attacking role with fabregas and against bournemouth, who don't really just stay back.

      Haz higher risk, lower reward, both in terms of points and captainship.

      I'm on ibra but might switch.

  11. Jimbo-Jones
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Kane & Morrison (-4) to:

    1. Ibra & 4.2

    2. Benteke &

    A: Walcott
    B: Sterling
    C: Mata

    Leaning towards 2A due to Ars fixtures and the fact I've missed all 3 of Ibra's price rises! 2 bench fodders over Xmas is also a bit too risky for me.

    Current team:
    Heaton
    Alonso Walker Cedric
    Haz Sanchez Siggy Eriksen
    Costa Kane Anichebe

    Pick, Amat, Morrison, 3.9

    1. tets mcgee (Bachmann an Rob…
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      yes 2a although 2b will prob outscore it this week

  12. PvA
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    442

    1. Tansey
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      ballsy

      1. PvA
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Only this week. No Costa

        1. Tansey
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          going 3-5-2 here with Anichebe and De Roon both starting because I'm holding Costa too. Rough week ahead

          1. PvA
            • 7 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            9/11 of my team are at home

            Some good fixtures. I'm playing Brunt vs Arsenal as a punt over de Roon

            1. Postman Ty
              • 9 Years
              7 years, 4 months ago

              I think that's a solid choice. Brunt will likely outscore him over the season anyways.

  13. sinik
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Sanchez is a MONSTER this season, statistically among mids (obviously we all know from FPL/the eyetest):
    #1 goals
    #2 assists
    #3 chances created
    #6 shots
    #4 shots in the box
    #3 shots in 6 yard box
    #4 shots on target
    #2 penalty area touches

    He's never leaving my team again this season.

    That being said..Ibra (c) tomorrow.

    1. Fred54
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Stuck between Sanchez and Ibra for captain myself . Have a shocker of a record for captain picks. Have had so many fails and very often on the safe picks too.

      1. william prunier
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Stung by Kane by any chance ;p

      2. CatMac
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I must have the most shocking record for captains this year and have both Ibra and Sanchez. I've gone Sanchez so I suggest go Ibra to be safe 😀

  14. GarethJohn
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Hello guys, I'm considering bribing in 2 CP players - Benteke & Mccarthur for Alli & Anichebe, is this a crazy move or are there other options I have? I have .5 in the bank:

    Heaton & Foster

    Apzi,clyne,peiters,Amat,Kingsley

    Sanchez,mane,Antonio,Alli,Lallana

    Kane,Costa,Anichebe

    Cheers

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      How much money are you offering them?

    2. afcblegend
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I wouldn't spend 5.0 on a fifth midfielder in McArthur when Darren Fletcher is effectively the same type of player for 4.4

      Otherwise move looks fine to me.

  15. afcblegend
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Just completely transformed my team. Mane -> Lallana is the only one that has me worried but for the most part positive moves I hope.

    Wildcard usage rating/10?

    25 Dec 23:43 David Luiz Amat GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Lallana Mané GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Zaha Chadli GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Negredo Callum Wilson GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Christian Benteke Defoe GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Ibrahimovic Kane GW18
    25 Dec 23:43 Pickford Valdés GW18

    1. Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      What the hell are you on about?

      1. afcblegend
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Against my better judgement I'm going to ask you to elaborate...

    2. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I just got Valdes in with Pick. Sun fixtures are mud and Middlesburger are great. So many sideways moves there

      1. afcblegend
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Agreed Valdes has some good games coming but I have Forster and that one was an enabling move, don't intend to play Pickford.

        Point taken though, when you look at them like that they do seem sideways but in context of the first team I'd like to think its in a better shape

      2. Postman Ty
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        I honestly don't understand how anyone has any keeper other than Heaton, Pickford, Grant, or Foster (or Jaku from the beginning). Value people, value.

    3. Totalfootball
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      4/10

      should have used it long before .
      nd why will u do mane>lallana .

    4. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Why did you get rid of Mane? Why sell Amat? Playing def at that price may as well stay to free up funds

      1. afcblegend
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        That was a comparison between:

        Mané + Amat vs Lallana + Luiz

        Would you go for Mane + Amat I take it then? At this point Amat has been useless to me and I don't have any Chelsea defensive cover.

        1. Postman Ty
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          He's right, there's no reason to not have Amat as a 5th defender.
          Chelsea - Tot/Ars/Mun - 4.5 - 4.5 - Amat
          Roughly, of course a lot of the good 4.5 options are upwards of 4.8 now. You could also swap one of them for someone in the 5.0 range like Brunt.

  16. PvA
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Who is Arsenal's pen taker?

    I remember Walcott taking one but missing (no surprise - he is useless)

    Santi, Giroud and Ramsey are not starters atm

    1. Fitzy.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Sanchez or Ozil?

    2. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ozil?

    3. La Roja
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ozil or Gru

    4. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Gabriel

    5. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Walcott will be doped up on expresso.

    6. AYEW KI-EDEN MEE
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Definitely not Ozil. He has a terrible record. You'd suspect Sanchez as he's the man in form or Walcott.

      1. Greenbackbøøg…
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Sanchez is awful at pens, as an owner I'd prefer he doesn't take them

        1. PvA
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          I think his career record is:

          2 penalties taken
          0 scored
          2 missed

          You must want him on pens though

          1. Greenbackbøøg…
            • 9 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            Don't like that pattern

          2. Pierce34
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            He's made at least one penalty for Chile (was a panenka).

  17. KneejerkJoe
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Quick poll, first to 3.

    I have to decide who to captain now, got no internet before deadline.

    A) Hazard (BOU)
    B) Sanchez (WBA)
    C) Mane (STO)
    D) Zlatan (SUN)

    1. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ibra

    2. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ibra

    3. Totalfootball
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      ibra

    4. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ding ding ding

  18. Team Cruel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    What would a penalty XI look like? Assuming something like this on AOA:

    Daniels - Baines
    Hazard - Siggy - Milner - Tadic - Chadli
    Kun - Ibra - Benteke

    1. Tansey
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      and captain whoever mike dean is officiating

    2. La Roja
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      That actually looks decent

    3. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Is Daniels on pens?

      1. Team Cruel
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        He is when Wilson isn't on the pitch (which he very often isn't).

    4. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Daniels isn't on pens anymore.

  19. La Roja
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Sad irony on his song.. last Xmas I gave you my heart.

    2016 can't end sooner. RIP George Michael.

    1. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Wow. Only 53

    2. afcblegend
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Bloody hell really? RIP

  20. F4L
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Alli -> Pogba for FT this week?

    1. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I prefer Kante, Chelsea look unstoppable atm

      1. La Roja
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        He must be that good to be considered when he is banned.

    2. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Too much mulled wine.

    3. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Miki if you have the money and are willing to take a chance.

  21. AYEW KI-EDEN MEE
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Heaton
    Alonso Cedric Amat
    Sanchez Eriksen Siggy Lallana
    Ibra Kane Benteke

    Pickford De Roon Pieters Evans

    A) Cedric -> Jones -4
    B) Save

    Worried about Cedric rotation over the next month with EPL cup and Christmas fixtures. Mourinho tends to keep a settled defence, espically cb's so Jones looks pretty nailed.

  22. Ya Boi
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    would you rather buy Lallana or Walcott?

    1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Wally

    2. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Wally simply cos of fixtures

    3. Point-one short
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Walcott - brilliant fixtures.

    4. Creedey
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Wally because it rhymes with Golly

  23. Pedram
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Why the F are people selling Kane, have they gone insane ?

    1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      They have gone outKane

    2. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Let them

    3. Greenbackbøøg…
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      True, after those last 2 games you'd be mad to not own him

    4. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      he looks off the pace atm, while Ibra is on fire

    5. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Shinier toys exist.

    6. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Ibra

    7. Creedey
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Because they Kante have him

  24. JIM BOB
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Two questions I'm struggling with guys....

    1) Captain Valencia (SUN) or Ozil (WBA) ???

    2) Vertongen, Fonte, Baines or Dann for the long term?

    Ta and merry Xmas all!

    1. Greenbackbøøg…
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Dann, Palace will be a changed team

    2. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      1) Ozil
      2) Dann (Fonte's future is uncertain)

  25. BigAsGiroud_
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Start:
    1)Rondon(ars)
    2)Capoue(CRY)

    1. Creedey
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Salomon

    2. afcblegend
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Rondon. Arsenal are in prime position to consolidate their exit from the title race this week.

    3. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      rondoman

  26. F4L
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Taking FPL out of the equation, who has impressed you more this season, Costa or Sanchez?

    1. afcblegend
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Costa for sure. Haven't seen anything from Sanchez that I didn't know he was capable of, whereas Costa made me go 'holy **** I didn't realise he was this good'

    2. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      If I ignore FPL I'd have to say Sanchez because of that time I captained him against Sunderland away

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        😆

    3. A.T
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Costa easily. Sanchez is getting some serious over hyping at the mo. I mean he's good, but he ain't that good

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        😯
        How dare you! Go sit in the naughty corner

    4. william prunier
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Costa by a long stretch

    5. Get up ya bum
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Costa probably impressed me more just because he's had a a pretty bad run by his standards but now is back to his best. Alexis is just always good.

  27. George Sillett
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    If you ever want a proper laugh watch the Paddy Power banned ads. They are the best

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vvq-uO-XgjM

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kIHwiZiHMAo

    1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I bet

    2. Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I hope we have a different captain this week to keep things interesting.

      1. George Sillett
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Me too. Will be at Kempton by revelation time so you will know what I have picked b4 I find out yours. Good luck - you will need it.

        1. Cheeseoid
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 4 months ago

          Don't worry. I will be asleep so I probably will not. Good luck to you. I hope you get the fair play award

          1. George Sillett
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 4 months ago

            Good luck my friend.

  28. Creedey
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Bench one:

    Alonso (BOU)
    Cedric (TOT)
    McAuley (ars)
    Mee (MID)
    Amat (WHU)

    Cheers 🙂

    1. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Amat

    2. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      McAuley, Cedric is close behind though.

    3. @chapellefpl OR 577TH
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Mcauley no brainer

    4. william prunier
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Mcauley easily

      1. Creedey
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks! 🙂

  29. @chapellefpl OR 577TH
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Playing Amat over Anichebe in a 4-4-2

    Right decision?

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Not for me oh twitter bird.

    2. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      I would

    3. A.T
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      No

      1. @chapellefpl OR 577TH
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Surely Amat has a better chance of cs than Anichebe of scoring?

  30. Tommyg
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    Last time Chelsea played bourmouth hazard scored a brace.

    Just saying.

    1. F4L
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Zlatan scores when he wants

    2. PvA
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      You don't get points for previous games

      Just saying.

      1. @chapellefpl OR 577TH
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 4 months ago

        Lol

    3. william prunier
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 4 months ago

      Potato