Team News

The Weekend Team News

Dele Alli is back in training but will be assessed ahead of Spurs’ clash with Watford. Andy Carroll could be back for West Ham, Palace are hit with long-term injuries to a couple of key midfielders, whilst West Brom’s Jonny Evans is ruled out for a fortnight with hamstring problems.

Dele Alli will be assessed tomorrow after being withdrawn early on due to dizziness in the midweek win over Norwich. Mauricio Pochettino has confirmed the midfielder is back in full training, saying “all the signals are good” ahead of the home encounter against Watford. Ryan Mason will also be assessed as he steps up his recovery from injury.

Andy Carroll returned to training on Monday and will be assessed ahead of West Ham’s trip to Southampton. New loan signing Emmanuel Emenike is also available after receiving his work permit, whilst Angelo Ogbonna will “hopefully” be fit, according to Slaven Bilic, after missing the midweek win over Villa due to illness. Sam Byram has been ruled out for a week after sustaining a small injury in training.

Tomas Rosicky could be out for up to three months after suffering an injury setback whilst on duty for the arsenal under 21 side. Danny Welbeck is set to step up his recovery with a run-out for the Gunners’ second-string later today.

Palace midfielders James McArthur (ankle ligaments) and Jason Puncheon (hamstring) are set for lengthy spells on the sidelines, with the former likely to miss the rest of the season. Joe Ledley remains out for two more weeks with a thigh injury, though Alan Pardew reckons Yohan Cabaye has a “very good” chance of returning from injury, whilst Dwight Gayle is available after returning to full training. Emmanuel Adebayor is “almost ready” to start and will have another cameo appearance, though Connor Wickham misses out through suspension.

Claudio Ranieri will make a late decision on the fitness of new signing Daniel Amartey ahead of Leicester’s trip to City tomorrow lunchtime.

Bournemouth boss Eddie Howe reckons Josh King – who made an appearance off the bench in midweek – is now up to full fitness. Junior Stanislas remains a doubt, though, with the Cherries set to make a late decision on the winger’s fitness.

Jeremain Lens is a major doubt for Sunderland after being forced off with a groin problem in midweek. Yann M’Vila is expected to shrug off a foot problem to continue in the centre of the park, whilst Younes Kaboul is back in the squad after overcoming a hamstring injury.

Jonny Evans has been ruled out for a couple of weeks with the hamstring injury that forced him off against Swansea. James Morrison and Chris Brunt also remain on the sidelines for the Baggies, Tony Pulis has confirmed.

Ki Sung-Yueng has been ruled out of Swansea’s clash with Palace after being forced off with concussion in the 1-1 draw with West Brom. New manager Francesco Guidolin has revealed that Alberto Paloschi “could” be in line for a first start on the back of an impressive sub performance at the Hawthorns.

All this and more has now been updated in the Team News section ahead of tomorrow’s deadline. Keep an eye on our official Twitter Stream for breaking news – as the day unfolds, we will issue updates from Friday’s press conferences and refresh our Team News tab accordingly to keep you informed.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

2,223 Comments Post a Comment
  1. RD
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Pick one to play
    Mahrez or Ighalo
    Target or Dawson

    1. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mahrez
      Targett

      1. RoyaleBlue
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        This

    2. Springbank
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mahrez - Dawson

    3. LC1
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mahrez Dawson

    4. Guru Mediation
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Ighalo
      Dawson

  2. Beavis
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    No Scout Picks preliminary squad? How am I supposed to pick my own differential picks? 🙁

    1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Good luck hope you thrash them 🙂

      1. Beavis
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks AW.

        1. Sjaugen
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Yeah, best of luck

  3. Cradders
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Butland or Schmeichel for this GW

    1. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Butland

    2. The Wise Owl
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Both are equally painful.

      1. Tadic is the new Eriksen
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Butland gonna do well

      2. Cradders
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Haha yes, Butland would be the standout choice if there was a Shawcross available

    3. Sterling Chap
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Think Schmeic might edge for me (*Butland owner here)

    4. Cradders
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I am tempted by Schmeichel though could get a lot of save points and it would benefit me if the game tomorrow is another City v Everton, I'll be less pissed off if Aguero and City in general blank

  4. Ten Season Wonder
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    I have 2FT (0.1 itb) and don't want to burn it. Any ideas?
    .
    .
    .
    Henn - Elliot

    Cresswell - Dier - Koscielny - Dawson - Simpson

    Alexis - Ozil - Payet - Mahrez - Alli

    Kun - Kane - Ighalo

    1. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Maybe Cresswell for Reid and Ighalo for Vardy if possible

      1. LC1
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        These two sound ideal

        1. Ten Season Wonder
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Interesting, but I was planning on keeping Ighalo for Palace game. then switching to Vardy.

          Is there anywhere I can save ££. maybe look at Targett in for someone, Daws maybe?

          1. rdamjan
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Reid is nailed yes?

    2. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Valencia--->Ighalo

    3. The Wise Owl
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Wow. You've really gone cheap on GKs. I actually don't know what to suggest.

    4. Pegboy
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Dawson > Reid?

  5. Bubz
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Was all set to captain Sanchez until Bemba goes and ruins it with his injury rumours 🙁

    1. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Wait what?

        1. Robe Wan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Haha

          Who the f is Dean?!!

      1. Christina.
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        utter toss

    2. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Wouldn't be put off by that.

    3. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      How often are Bemba's late scares accurate?

    4. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Ozil's also been injured every single week this season...

    5. pompeyfan
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Wenger has given a presser conference within the past couple of hours. Would you rather listen to un-known twitter users or the clubs manager?

      1. Christina.
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        hey Pomp, you going Alexis(c)?

        I'm tempted with him or Ozil.

        1. pompeyfan
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          hi. Nah, probably going with Aguero, although still tempted by Sanchez, he would certainly be my vc, and I haven't totally decided yet.

          1. Christina.
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            yeah, you have a decent rank, makes sense.

            I'm 100 behind in my ML...feel like rolling the dice.

            1. pompeyfan
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              good luck, I think he's a very good option this gw

      2. Bubz
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I just dont like any doubt, when theres other great captains. I will probably stick with Alexis though

        1. pompeyfan
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          yeah, but I could probably dig out a doubt from some clown on twitter about any player in the league at any given moment, if I had the time and botheredness

  6. HRISTO STOICHKOV
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    What you guys thinkabout that?

    Cech

    Toby (vc) --- Sagna ---- Azpi--- Dann

    Payet --- Özil --- Alli ---- Arnautovic

    Valencia --- Agüero (c)

    Bench: Butland / Mahrez /Vardy/ G.Johnson /

    I have 1 FT and 00.00$ in the bank.
    Please guys help me out!

    1. Guru Mediation
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Play Vardy and Mahrez, drop Sagna and Arnautovic

      1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Against Man city?! you gotta be kidding me.
        Do you think they are going to score or win against them?

        1. Sjaugen
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Liverpool scored 4 against them away...
          But otoh, the tea,s will probably be really afraid of each others, and play super safe for a dull affair

  7. stojanovzr
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Butland
    Koscielny Sagna Dier Simpson Targett
    Shagiri Ozil barkley ali mahrez
    Aguero Rooney vardy

    bench 3 players,please

    for me it's not to easy,shaqiri scored 2 goals against everton last time

    1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Vardy, mahrez, simpson

      1. stojanovzr
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        you think so:),vardy is my new man instead of lukaku,so i must play him

    2. Tadic is the new Eriksen
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Barkley, Simpson, Targett

      1. stojanovzr
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        yes maybe

  8. FF Dirtbag
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Who to captain?!

    A) Ozil
    B) Kun
    C) Kane?!

    1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      B)

    2. Tadic is the new Eriksen
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      (C)ane

    3. Pegboy
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      C)

  9. luke25
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Bottomed 🙁

    Bench one:

    Walker
    Van Dijk
    Moreno
    Hoolahan

    Thanks!

    1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Moreno

      1. luke25
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        thanks

    2. Rains of Castamere
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Hoolahan

      1. Red Devil Swede
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Hoolahan will play ~ 75 mins this GW

    3. Pegboy
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Hoolahan

  10. Sterling Chap
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    No idea, what to do this week. Any thoughts gents?

    Butland (McCarthy)
    Monreal Dawson Alderweireld (Fuchs Francis)
    Alli* Mahrez Özil Payet (Arnautovic)
    Agüero Kane Lukaku*

    2FT / 0.6 ITB

    1. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I'd downgrade Payet/Arnie to a cheap 5th mid. Then you have cash for Alexis ready.

      Lindgard 4.2 or Stannis 4.2 maybe?

      1. Sterling Chap
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I hadn't even considered that. I was holding onto Arnie as he doesn't have a blank in GW30 but perhaps he's just eating up cash. Cheers

    2. Pochecinno
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Upgrade McCarthy, everything else looks OK

      1. Sterling Chap
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I do have keeper concerns. Would only give me £4.2 to spend though. Not many great choices at that amount

        1. Pochecinno
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Hennessey or Elliot should be fine. Elliot for DGW?

          1. Sterling Chap
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            You talk much sense my friend. I feel that this is what I should do. However, Payet > Firmino is whispering in my ear...

  11. Ibralicious
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Is Sanchez by any means a must have at this point? Contemplating dropping him for Ozil in my WC team to up defense.

    1. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      No. He is injured. See above

    2. Tadic is the new Eriksen
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Yeah, I'd say he'd be a key part if your team if you're on WC

      1. Ibralicious
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Ahh ok thanks

  12. Tadic is the new Eriksen
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Bench one:

    Payet, Mahrez, Alli, Vardy, Mirallas

    thanks 😀

    1. stojanovzr
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      mirallas

    2. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mir

    3. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Vardy

    4. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mirallas. He has even more competition now with Pienaar and Niasse.

    5. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Sell Mirallas.

  13. zuzuViking
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Lukaku & Johnson -> Kane & Target?

    Done deal or free transfer steal?

    1. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Do you have cover if Targett doesn't play?

      1. zuzuViking
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Yes, it will be ok if he is sidelines

        1. Hooky
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Go for it then.

    2. stojanovzr
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      what if targget play only 5 min,last game play 5 min

  14. FredrikH
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Who to play? SFR

    A) Williams
    B) Moreno
    C) Bellerin

    1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      MOreno

  15. Mahesh_Kumar
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Play DDG or Elliot?

    1. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      DDG

    2. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      DDG

    3. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      im playing Elliot but then i have Costa and maybe Oscar

    4. Ten Season Wonder
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      DDG

  16. Jigger & Pony
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Who would you bench between Vardy, Mahrez, Alli and Payet this weekend?

    1. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Payet.

    2. Ten Season Wonder
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Mahrez

    3. 1zverGGademN
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I'm currently on Payet but not sure for Alli's gametirme now.. Chadli, Son and Lamela are all good options after 60th min :/

  17. Can Leicester Win The Title?
    Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    This is why Leicester won't win the Premiership:

    http://members.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/my-stats-tables/view/13398/

    1. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Their passing is almost as bad as Ipswich! Must be lots of long balls over the top?

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Yep.

        1. FPL Daniel
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Yes they can. I really hope they win it

    2. Eden Hazardous
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      They play counter attacking football ,so pass accuracy will naturally be lower (if the table is about pass accuracy , if not , then ignore me)

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Indeed. But theirs is the lowest in the division. I kid you not.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I know that...their entire tactics are based on moving the ball quickly from defence to Mahrez/Vardy/Okazaki

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            - which must mean that they have been immensely lucky, so far.

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              They have been lucky in their conversion but deserve to be in the top 4-6 imo..of course it remains to be seen if this is repeatable

            2. Dr. Agabuse
              • 11 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              No, it means we must adress the worthiness of respective statistics.

              If the worst passing team is first in the overall table, surely passing is less important if you use certain tactics.
              They haven't been immensely lucky!
              If they were sixth, you would still have to state that and if they were sith, in truth they would have been immensely unlucky.

              1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                No it doesn't. 🙂

              2. GreenWindmill
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                I think the different tactics element is key.

                If a team attempting to play possession football had a poor pass completion they would undoubtedly fail but Leicester's game isn't built on knocking the ball around carefully and keeping their discipline, it's all about pacey counterattacks which have a higher rate of breakdown but a greater rate of return when successful.

                1. pompeyfan
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  exactly.

                  One team might have a strategy of playing lower % much more dangers passes in the final 3rd. Maybe 4 out of 5 are missed but 1 results in a striker being clean through and scoring.

                  Whereas another team might just play 5 accurate yet conservative 5 yards passes around without causing as much danger.

                  Which tactic is better? The stats won't like the first one

                  1. RedLightning
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 13 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    I remember a World or European Cup a few years ago when Patrice Evra was widely regarded as being the man of the match in the first game.

                    However, he ended up with negative points in the fantasy game because of the number of his crosses which failed to reach their target.

                    It was so ridiculous that the fantasy game organisers immediately changed the rules and stopped deducting points for misplaced passes.

              3. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Hmm... if they were sith, I think they would use the force to win the league at ease.

                1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  😆 Silly Billy! 😀 😉

            3. Donblaster
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              massive lol at 'Leicester have been immensely lucky'

              1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Thank you, as always, for your constructive contribution to the debate. 😉

                1. Donblaster
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Don't take it too personally.

                  That particular comment just wasn't worthy of a constructive contribution.

                  1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 14 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Oh, don't worry - I don't take it personally at all.

                    But you have just hung a label around your own neck.

                    1. Donblaster
                      • 10 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      you seriously need to chill out mate!

                    2. La Roja
                      • 12 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Unnecessary

                    3. Sjaugen
                      • 8 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Pass completion has any strong correlation towards points scored?
                      If so, that metric would have weight

                      1. RedLightning
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 13 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Might it even have a negative correlation?

                        It's fairly similar to possession really - the LVG philosophy that if you have the lion's share of possession then are dominating the game, and that you are unlucky if the opposition use their more limited possession to break more quickly, create more chances and score more goals.

    3. mazzington☘
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      So Liverpool are gonna finish second, yeah...?

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Tables don't work like that.

        1. Camp No No
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          ^this. No need to draw silly conclusions just because there is another real point to be made here.

    4. pompeyfan
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      more than one way to skin a cat. It's not working out too well for Liverpool afterall

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Look at shot accuracy.

        1. mazzington☘
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          So Spurs are going to win the league?

          1. Camp No No
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Possibly. they're not going to keep this shot accuracy and conversion differential forever, but their general stats are very nice and they've got an excellent schedule after the City match.

        2. pompeyfan
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          true, Liverpool's accuracy is on the lower side, however I'd argue that a difference of 7% of shot accuracy isn't statistically significant enough when you consider how many shots we are dealing with

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            It is huge, trust me. 🙂

            1. pompeyfan
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              I respectfully disagree, if you look at the raw numbers of shots on target this season:
              Leicester = 113
              Liverpool = 109

              Fairly similar

              1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Yes, but putting it rather clumsily, Leicester have scored theirs, while Liverpool, to put it mildly, have managed to fluff most, one way or another.

    5. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      And this is why they might: http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/matchday/league-table.html 😉

      In all seriousness though, they have the least fixture congestion and haven't slowed down yet. Also, whilst they create fewer chances than many teams the chances they do create are good ones. Add Big Chances into your table and sort by that - interesting reading.

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Factor this in: Mahrez has dropped from creating 4 chances per game, to less than 1.

        Vardy's shot accuracy has sustained them thus far - can he keep it up?

        Without Kanté, they are marshmallow until you get to Morgan.

        1. Prøphet
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I think Inler can provide decent cover there if something would have happened to Kante.

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            He is not a patch. Honestly.

        2. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          What's happened to Kante?

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Nothing. Yet.

            1. andy85wsm
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Well if we're going on ifs and buts there's numerous things we can factor in.

        3. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Only 2 teams have created more big chances in the last 2, 4 or 6 weeks - Mahrez's dip hasn't prevented them from getting in on goal and Vardy has been sustaining that rate for 24 weeks now, it's starting to look like business as usual.

          I'm not saying I think they will win it but they've got a hell of a chance.

          I agree if injuries to key players (like Kante) were to happen then the landscape changes massively though.

        4. Zizoulicious
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Taking the best player out of any team would severely weaken them. Kante is for Leicester what Aguero is for Spurs

          1. GreenWindmill
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            A massive thorn in their side who scores against them regularly? 😉

            1. Zizoulicious
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Well, different positions but both vital to their respective teams. i.e. taking Aguero out of City would weaken their title chances as much as taking Kante out of Leicester

              1. GreenWindmill
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                I was actually referencing the fact that Aguero doesn't play for Spurs (the point you were making was fine, I'm just being an arse 😉 )

                1. Zizoulicious
                  • 8 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  aha oops lol. I was thinking of both Aguero and Kane at the same time 😛

        5. BananaNose Maldonado
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          But their clean sheets have spiked during this Mahrez drop. It's a change of style and tactics that's working for them. By sitting back and countering, the key is continuing to finish at a high rate, not passing accuracy. And counter attacking styles lead to higher conversion rates because the chances - even if limited - are usually more threatening because they come from very open play, not congested.

          It's why Navas's number of crossed has always been an empty stat - because they usually come against nine guys in the box.

      2. Zizoulicious
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Yes I think this is the key point with Leicester. Apart from their recent goal scoring dip, they tend to create a high quality of chances - which is directly linked to getting the ball forward at the speed of light. Their whole tactical approach basically bypasses needless possession, it's all about moving the ball forward into space as soon as possible.

      3. FPL Daniel
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Well said GreenWM. Upvoted

    6. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Sort by passes completed in the final third and it's even more dooming.

      Yet that chance-creation is not that far worse, imo, that they couldn't keep their current lead seen taxing schedules their rivals have. There is a real chance.

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Indeed. But even with these:

        LEI : NOR 362 WBA 287 wat 93 NEW 449 cpl 183 SOT 129 sun 292 WHM 128 SWA 277

        I believe that they will struggle. Too much chasing to be done.

    7. Prøphet
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I think its the style they play. I do think they are the prime candidates. Counter-Attacking football means a lot of first touch passes and thats the hardest thing to do. First touch forward passes.
      Dont think its an indicator of much honestly. They had lower possesion than 13 of the teams they won against.

      1. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Question: how much will they be able to counter the low table teams that they countered away now that they play them at home and top the table themselves so are hardly underdogs? I can foresee all of the smaller PL club playing a very deep defence line against Leicester.

        And then, are they good enough to go and take wins against the biggest clubs at their home turf? They will play away to each and every presumable top6 club this Spring. You think they'll win them? If they now lose against both City and Arsenal, that goes half way to saying goodbye to the title (however, if they do, I will likely put my money on them winning it because the odds will again be playable and their schedule for the rest of the season looks extremely nice, with only the doubt that I presented in the first paragraph).

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          What if they don't lose both of those games though? 😉

          1. Camp No No
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Then I won't put my money on them. If they win even one, the title is theirs to lose.

            1. Camp No No
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              * well, if they win even one, I won't put my money on them. If they, say, draw a one, they'll probably still lose the pole position to City and will have playable odds.

              I might also put my money on Spurs. Currently have it on Arsenal (since last August) and for some while have wanted to cash out but betvictor doesn't let me (they have the most dysfunctional cash out system, don't rely on it). Arse is not going to win it.

              1. Cradders
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Our fixtures for the remainder of the season are awful, I wish we could win it but it's highly unlikely

                1. Camp No No
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  And 'you' would mean who?

            2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              + 42.

              So it is now sh!t or bust time.

              By the way, IMMENSE credit MUST go to Ranieri. I think this must be one of THE managerial feats of all time, I really do.

              1. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Yeah, said it before the season that the only question about him is why on earth he goes to Leicester (well, that's answered now, too). In your face, doubters! 😀 I was genuinely surprised to see how so many in England, including on this site, considered him as a poor manager.

                1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  I was gobsmacked. AND - he is a nice bloke!

                  1. Camp No No
                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Is he? That too, then. Haven't met him 😉 but at least can't think of anything negative that he had managed to do concerning the human relations.

                    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      He and Slaven get on well. That'll do for me. 😉

        2. Prøphet
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I really think they are. They have won 14 games and in 13 of them they had lower possesion. Leave Mahrez some space if you drop deep and he will exploit it like he used to do. I really do believe they will pose a serious threat to everyone. I also do not think if they lose both its done. both MCI and ARS have been dropping points in random games they should be winning.

          1. Camp No No
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Which they are? Able to counter the lower table clubs? Because I think that when they come to visit the league leaders, they're going to park the bus and refuse to have the possession. It may end up being surprisingly difficult for Leicester to win all these easy matches.

        3. Cradders
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          They won at Spurs

    8. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      theyve got a 5 pt lead with less than half to go. Thats not luck

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Call it luck , call it variance , call it a finishing streak , whatever it is , IT is UNsustainable

        1. Prøphet
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Thats been said in gw 5. It is sustainable obviously

          1. andy85wsm
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            "It's not sustainable" is the reason I've never owned Vardy. He's now scored nearly as many as some of the best in Europe 😆

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Vardy's scoring is surprising sustainable , its Mahrez's scoring which has been unsustainable

              1. andy85wsm
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 13 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                But they don't necessarily need Mahrez to keep scoring, doesn't matter who does at the end of the day, and they've found a way to not concede too so they don't need to score as many.

                Also, as an example (and I promise this is a coincidence), Chelsea won the league last year with their best playet scoring 14 goals and 10 assists. Mahrez is only 1 goal and 1 assist away from that.

                Are Leicester Chelsea? No of course not. But they've not gotten where they are with luck, and Mahrez going off the boil hasn't hurt them too much so far. Nothing to say he won't bounce back with the decent run of fixtures they have soon.

                They also have no cup games or Europe to worry about.

                1. Prøphet
                  • 8 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Okazaki has been playing very very well lately, so other players pick up when someone slumps in form. Thats how it works

                2. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  I am not saying it is luck , I am is saying it is a hot finishing streak which will balance out , maybe this season or the next.

                  If their finishing regresses this season , they will *just* (this is also a big big achievement) , in the top 4 and if not they will finish in the top 2 or even win the title..simples?

                  1. Anathallo
                    • 14 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Hot finishing streak perhaps. Or maybe they are working hard on their finishing and therefore would expect it to be statistically above average? Perhaps you are right, or perhaps the trend will continue.

            2. Prøphet
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Exactly. We always find justification to make it easier for us not to pick someone up. I do it, like everyone else. I do hope that LEI wins it. I really do.
              Also i do think Mahrez will pick it back up.

          2. Dr. Agabuse
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Vivi is right!

            1. Prøphet
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Obviously! 😀

        2. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I think you're deluded 😉

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Right....Leicester are a top 4-6 team , not title contenders

            1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              You're a stubborn one aren't you? 😛

              So their performances thus far have been a fluke? I think not

              1. Prøphet
                • 8 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Have to agree with you Jaffa.

            2. Prøphet
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              THey are title contenders. Like it or not, they are this season.

        3. Give The Todd Some Love
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          *cough* Yaya 13/14 *cough*

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Yaya is one player who is an excellent finisher. Don't tell me Leicester as a whole became WORLD CLASS finishers in a matter of months 😕

            1. Prøphet
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              They played exceptionally well end of last season. Something clicked and thats just it.

              1. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                They played pretty much similarly all of the last season. Just had better luck with conversion towards the end. They were extremely unlucky in the beginning of the last season.

            2. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Do they have to become 'world class finishers' to win games? No

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Yes , or they need to increase their volume of shooting. Their rate of converting Goal Difference to points has been highest by far...

                1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  See this: http://members.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/my-stats-tables/view/7897/

                  They don't need to increase the frequency/volume of their shooting because they are already in the top quarter for SoT, SiB etc.

                  1. Eden Hazardous
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    See below

                  2. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Second highest for shot accuracy as well. 😉

            3. Give The Todd Some Love
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              I don't really understand how you can watch their games and call them lucky. Ignoring the stats, they're where they are on merit alone. The only game I can think of where they weren't the better team was against Arsenal, and even that was an end to end game.

              1. GreenWindmill
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                And this. It would be interesting to watch back some games where the stats (xG / possession / whatever) suggest they were fortunate to win and see how that stacks against the eye test...

    9. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      And yet their Shot Accuracy is second highest in addition to the number of goals they have scored. 😉

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Vardy. See my point above.

        1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I don't see your point Doos. Your table is suggesting that Pass Completion is related to how well Leicester will do which is not the case.

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Pass completion , lets forget that...see this

            Leicester in the PL
            Shots ratio - 10th
            SoT ratio - 7th
            xG ratio - 8th
            GD - 3rd

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Ratios = Stat for/(Stat for + Against)

              1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Shot accuracy - 2nd, behind Spurs.

                1. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  This too

            2. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Lei in the PL

              Shot accuracy - 2nd highest
              No of Goals - joint 2nd highest
              SoT - 4th highest

              Your serve 😉

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                What about defensive stats???!!!

                1. andy85wsm
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 13 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  5 goals conceded in 10 games.

                  Better than best defence in the league Spurs.

                  1. Eden Hazardous
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Yup , they have improved in the last but what about the first 15? They were abysmal..some would say lucky to conceded less

                    1. andy85wsm
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 13 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      They were scoring more than so it didn't matter.

                      New way to win now 🙂

                      1. Eden Hazardous
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Leicester are a very good team considering their talent but a lot has to fall in their way (again) for them to win the title. Arsenal/Man City still the favourites for me

              2. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Also shot accuracy isn't sustainable

                1. Anathallo
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  This is not necessarily true

                  1. Prøphet
                    • 8 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    I agree, unsustainable since gw5 people were shouting.

                    1. Camp No No
                      • 10 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Actually, it's a bit more complicated:

                      Leicester's accuracy in unblocked shots is not exceptionally high, it's 7th in the league (Tottenham's is, however, and totally unsustainable).

                      But Leicester has exceptionally low proportion of their shots blocked, only Norwich, Southampton and West Ham have lower, and City has 8% more of their shots blocked. Just how much of your shots is blocked by the opponent so that they do not deflect towards the goal, or are not rebounded for new chances, is extremely unstable, the historical results do not in any way predict the future ones in this case. So, it's something they cannot keep up forever.

                      Maybe they'll end the season with 4th lowest rate of shots blocked? Fully possible. But it still means they've been lucky and you shouldn't expect them to keep that for the next season.

                      1. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        I do agree with that, i am just talking about this season nothing else. Who knows what would have happened next season if they all stayed together.
                        For example, when i play futsal there are players who have their shots blocked way less than others. Why? Because they are better at finding space too shoot and a lot of different things come into it.
                        Does futsal = outdoor? Absolutely not by any means, but trying to make a point.

                      2. Camp No No
                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        But even on this season, the number of shots blocked has little to do with the players shooting. That's just a very fluctuating stat, there is no such factor from which you could predict it. E.g. the player. Same players have their shots blocked rates fluctuate all the time. Or the style of play: no affect. It's just a whole lot of luck.

                        The shot blocking itself is so hazardous move: it can be properly blocked, it can deflect the ball off the field, it can deflect it on target leaving GK helpless, it can create a new better chance for the opponent, etc. Or it can miss the ball altogether. So when it changes the direction from the defender's foot and goes in, it's not a blocked shot in stats, it's a shot on target and a goal. And it's not because of how well the shooter has played, but because he got "lucky" in the sense that the random factor of success of shot blocking just went to his advantage with all the unpredictable factors falling in his favour that time.

                      3. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        I absolutely agree with you. There is a lot of things that arent considered in things like this. But, thats just its counted. Cant change it even if you wanted too. I wasnt referring to the direction of blocked shots or whatever. Some players just find a way for their shot not to get blocked. Shooting through your legs, above your knee etc. Obviously this is used a lot in futsal, but your point is still valid.

                      4. RedLightning
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 13 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Surely the low number of blocked shots must be related to the speed with which they break.

                        Teams that rely on slow progress through safe possession are more likely to find more of their shots in crowded penalty areas being blocked.

                      5. RedLightning
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 13 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Peter Schmeichel used to regard a deflected shot as being a serious mistake by the defender.

              3. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                I think those stats are implied in EH's stats that explain also how unlikely they're to stay that high, Jaffalito. He won his serve then.

                Both of you: Leicester and Spurs may have had slightly unsustainable conversion rate differences (maybe Arsenal too, in fact) so far this season. Those are likely to come down. But the wins are bagged, nevertheless, and the thing is that their performance level right now may be sufficient to bag either of them _enough_ points in the last matches to win the title. Not the most in the league for the rest of the matches, but enough to keep the advantage they've won now, and in Spurs case to even win some more (top performers of recent, in defence in particular).

                1. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  I agree with this a lot...can I upvote 42 times? 😉

                  1. Camp No No
                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    You have to ask some help from Doosra. 😉

            3. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              GD - 2nd*

            4. andy85wsm
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              League position - 1st.

              1. Now I'm Panicking
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Boom!

              2. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                That's what I am saying..their conversion rate is 20%, Leicestre not a team of 11 Yaya Toure that this will continue

            5. GreenWindmill
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              I think the shots stats are also skewed by tactics.

              Leicester take fewer shots than the teams around them but they are of better quality because when you're breaking at pace the opposition's defence is stretched. Often the counterattack will breakdown and result in you not getting a shot away but when you do it's usually a clear sight at goal.

              That's my hypothesis anyway 🙂

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Expected goals http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation.com/2014/2/12/5404348/english-premier-league-shot-statistics

                They rank 7th in it....it measures quality of chances and YES..it accounts for counter attacks

                1. GreenWindmill
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 12 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  There remains the possibility that the xG model you follow doesn't fit in all/any cases...

                  1. Eden Hazardous
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Of course there are teams which *beat* their Expected Goals but to outperform by the margins they are doing is unprecedented/very very rare

                    1. Prøphet
                      • 8 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      If stats where working that way, betting on every single game with expected goals would make you a profit?
                      Would you be willing to bet xG on a weekly basis and share with us how much you won/lost?

                      Thats why all these bookies exist, football is extremely unpredictable.

                      1. Eden Hazardous
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Expected goals don't predict future so I don't get your point?

                      2. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Why then bother with saying xG is a merit thing to go on by?

                      3. Eden Hazardous
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        To see if their performances are sustainable and to see which teams are in fact playing good and not getting results and vice versa

                      4. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        I really do not think you are making much sense now, or im just too daft to understand.

                        Basically, xG show if someone is playing good? I think not.
                        xG shows if something is sustainable? How? I also think not.
                        Maybe i am just reading too much into this, but in any case lets agree to disagree on the validity of xG 🙂

                      5. Camp No No
                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        It would, Prophet, it would. In the long run, you would win by always betting on the xG, except that...

                        ...the bookies know about these stats and use them, and as the bookie always gets his slice of the odds, in the end you need to do something more clever to win.

                      6. Nickofoz
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Agree 100% with this

                      7. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        if all other things were equal, aka bookies odds are all 2 do you think it would be profitable? Genuine question

                      8. Camp No No
                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        In that case, of course it would. You would become rich very fast.

                      9. Camp No No
                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        @prophet: btw, see my reply to you about shot accuracy, explaining what exactly is lucky about Leicester's shooting:

                        http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2016/02/05/the-weekend-team-news-190/?hc_page=9#hc_comment_12611498

                        It's very well established fact that the rate of shots getting blocked is unpredictably fluctuating.

                      10. Prøphet
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Just replied there

          2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            No, that is not what my table is about. At all. 🙁

    10. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      And this is why "moneyball" doesn't work in football

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Pass completion isn't even IMPORTANT ffs

        Shots , xG et all are more important

        1. Prøphet
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Well, Watching them play is more imporant rather than looking at expected goals or whatever. Thats just silly. I expected a lot of things that didnt happen.
          I do think most of the people tend to lean towards stats way to much in assesing things. This isnt baseball

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            I am saying , they have been good and may as well win the title but there have been many ususual things about their title challenge

            Shot conversion - 1st
            Shot accuracy - 2nd
            Penalties won - 1st

            If all of these were league averages ( I know too many ifs and buts) , thy would be 6-7th

            1. Prøphet
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Well to get penalties you have to be inside the box a lot, doing that on a counter can lead to penalties. As you said, a lot of ifs and buts, and it just might be they are better at shooting then the rest?

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Why weren't they good at shooting last season? or the season before? or the season before? and so on?

                1. Anathallo
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Because things change. Why was Jamie Vardy playing non-league a few years ago? He got better.

              2. Anathallo
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Agree with a lot of what you're saying here and above. Good points.

                1. Anathallo
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  That was to Prophet!

                  1. Prøphet
                    • 8 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Cheers mate

                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                touches inside the box, again Leicester are 6th or 7th

                1. Prøphet
                  • 8 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  You can argue that with their style of play they dont take many touches in the box and rather finish their attacks sooner.

                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Sorry I was just posting that as a response to "Well to get penalties you have to be inside the box a lot"

                    FWIW there's very little correlation between penalties won and other metrics but I do think there is something about the style of play that leads to winning penalties as Jamie Vardy and Luis Suarez are two notable examples who seem to win a large number of penalties and are known for their very fast/direct play.

                    1. andy85wsm
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 13 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Simplifying it I guess as you say it's just because they're fast and will try and take their man on and go past them due to speed.

                      They're not the biggest strikers either so always likely to go down a bit easier.

                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Yeah that's seems pretty good reasoning behind it and as a defender its always harder to make a clean tackle when the opposition is moving at speed.

                    2. Prøphet
                      • 8 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      I do believe to a certain extent its because of their style of play. I do think the way they play with being extremely direct does give them more penalties.

        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        and what does "moneyball" mean to you? It never really meant to mean anything more than being efficient with your money.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          This

        2. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Ha - I was going to say "sabermetrics" but no-one would have known what I was on about 😉

            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Don't underestimate your audience or you'll drag them down to your level 😉

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              That's a long way for people to be dragged down to 🙂

                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                😀

    11. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Ooo - hulked!!! 😎 😆

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Well it is a good discussion, even if we don't agree. Those are usually the best kind of discussions if civil 🙂

      2. FISSH
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        you rely too much on statistics.

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I don't rely on statistics. I use them

          1. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Chuck Norris doesn't play FPL. He knows Doosra would beat him.

    12. bibi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Respect but disagree.

      I think we should look at team stats when play against lei, must look different otherwise they wouldnt have been on top by now. I think the will win the title.

    13. Anathallo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      While statistics matter I think people can put far too much emphasis on them, as happening here. Making remarks like 'this cannot continue' etc suggests that all performance in football is directly predictable, which it isn't. It's fair to say that their performances have been exceptional, and that history would suggest that it isn't sustainable but at the end of the day they are killing teams. Perhaps that is because they are concentrating on things like improving finishing etc. We've seen plenty of teams have excellent stats and struggle.

      I've been expecting them to derail all along, and perhaps they still will, but I've put my doubt aside and for me they are now the favourites.

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Statistics said Crystal Palace to be a bottom half team when they were top 5 and lo and behold , they are 12th now and have scored only 2 goals in the last 6

        Statistics said Arsenal/Sanchez were very good after their shaky start and look what happened

        For that one exception which stats get wrong , it is insulted and ignored imo

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Stats said Aguero was rubbish before his 25 point haul, stats said Everton were only going to score 1 goal at most on Wednesday - stats are sometimes right, sometimes wrong. Anyone can cherry pick to get the stats they want to prove their point, or dis-prove anothers.

          1. AK ⭐
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Stats are also saying that Leicester's Shot Accuracy is 2nd in the league, then why are we assuming it will go down to average? They are there cause of a reason.

              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Because shooting accuracy has a relatively high variance compared to other measurables in football so you expect it to regress more than other metrics.

              1. AK ⭐
                • 11 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                But to think it will 'definitely' regress? They play on the counter so there is a lot of open space for them to shoot when they do. And Vardy has his boots on, Mahrez is a special player who loves to create and knows how to score.

                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  I'm not saying it definitely will regressed as there's always a chance Leicester have found a genuine way to get more shots on target, but the my default assumption is it will regress (as will Tottenham's) to an extent.

          2. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Only Doos said he was rubbish , xG had him first , shots had him forst , it was the SoT lacking

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              So, as you think you know the stats that predict everything, you are OR 1 in FPL yes?

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Stats focus on long term first of all. FPL is all about short term

                Smon March won it last year using stats

                I am not the only one using stats

                1. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  And there is a chance of stats backfiring in the short term

                2. AK ⭐
                  • 11 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Simon March used stats in the 'right way'.

                  38 gameweeks is certainly long term, yeah? 😉

                  1. Eden Hazardous
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Er..you keep on changing yoout team for 38 weeks including 2 WC and 38 short term captaincy decisions

                    1. AK ⭐
                      • 11 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Not that you can't use stats for those..

                    2. RedLightning
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 13 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      The long term effect is made up of many short term decisions.

                      The decisions may not all be successful in the short term - there will be good and bad game-weeks along the way, and luck also plays a part - but the cumulative effect of a series of good decisions should certainly improve the chances of a successful outcome in the long term.

          3. Camp No No
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Stats didn't say Kun was rubbish. They said that he was not in an amazing form and had had an unsustainably high rate of shots blocked.

            1. Camp No No
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              hmm... in fact, another look, and he was pretty fine by most stats. explosion imminent, so to say.

          4. BuK II
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Pretty sure stats said explosion imminent before his 25 pt haul.

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              But how many players have had an explosion imminent and then failed to explode?

              And why don't Explosion Imminent tables include the players with similar stats who HAVE been getting the goals and assists as well as those who haven't, so that one can see which of the players who haven't are actually any better than others who have?

          5. RedLightning
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            I agree.

            "There's lies, damn lies, and statistics".

        2. Anathallo
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Not insulting them, just saying you can put too much emphasis on them. Look at Liverpool's moneyball signings - Carroll, Downing etc. Great stats but didn't work as a team.

          Statistics can make suggestions but that is all. Sometimes the theory bears out (probably usually) but not always. That's what makes football fun. I have a friend who works for Opta and is a statistician, even he says that they are of limited value. He cited for instance people praising Bournemouth's success based on distance covered (league leaders in this so far) but then look at Burnley last year - they ran farthest but got relegated. Perhaps Bournemouth's success is related to their work-rate - but if it is it is because of HOW they are running, not just because they are running.

          Just like with passing. They may be completing less passes, but perhaps that is because their passes are more ambitious. Or perhaps when they are successful they are more penetrating or picking out the right players.

          I'm not saying stats don't matter or aren't useful. Just that they are not the be all and end all, and there are lots of other subjective factors which influence things.

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Liverpool's analysts are idiots first of all

            Using analytics and using it RIGHT is a big big difference

            Distance covered means squat , if your positioning is good , you don't need to cover much distance

            Agreed with the passing things

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Also we are not 100% sure that Liverpool's analysts had 100% freedom to choose signings

              1. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                I'd say we can be 100% sure that analysts had little real power on those signings.

            2. Anathallo
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Yep, I think that we're agreeing here and that's all I was really trying to say. I suppose I would add that even used right you have to ready to be proved wrong sometimes, because it will only be a matter of time before something changes.

              Checking out of this conversation here as meant to be working but this was a good 'un!

            3. Camp No No
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Distance covered is not a useless stat. it's funny, but the players who position well often also cover the most distance. they just _run_ less.

            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Liverpool were being led by a bit of a stats fraudster in Damien Comolli, also re distance ran, that's a great example of stats being used badly. We measure all this stuff but a lot of people don't take the time to work out which bits are actually meaningful.

            1. Camp No No
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              I don't think it was Comolli who decided to buy those players, mate. He did some pretty nice job elsewhere, and his style was to actually do moneyball by finding cheap, unnoticed players from Europe, not to overpay for English players. Those two reek of manager signings to me.

                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                It's hard to untangle who's responsible for what especially when for the sake of their careers everyone at the club in 2012 tries to take credit for Suarez when dodging the bullets of failed signings.

                Listening to and reading interviews with him, he seems full of crap. When talking to Analytics FC about the Eredivisie, he talks about an Eredivisie goal being worth one tenth of a PL goal in their evaluations. That in itself seems like a huge pile of crap. It'd make a 100 goal season in the Netherlands worth 10 goals here, hmmmm.

                1. Camp No No
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Ok. That exact number is a pile of cr*p, agreed. Yet, there's a truth in that it's far easier to score in Eredivisie than in other big leagues. There are ways to assess these, but it does not give you a clear ratio and what it gives certainly is not 1/10 rate.

                  Anyway, whether or not you think Comolli succeeded at Arsenal, Spurs and St.-Étienne, the signings he made in these clubs had at least some aspects of moneyball, and were mostly of the type of finding a player that they could probably sell for a good surplus value later. While it's hard to say who's responsible for signings of Carroll and Downing, they have nothing of "moneyball" in them. Paying £35M for a striker who had half a season of strong form behind him looked like an absolute antithesis of moneyball. To me, it looks very little like a signing that an analyst would even consider and very much like a signing of a chairman or old-fashioned manager.

                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    At Arsenal he was a scout and did extremely well but as his job morphed into director of football/analyst it seems his moves got progressively worse as he seemingly blinded himself with numbers. I don't want to say too much more on him for fear of having my facts wrong but to me he seems to give off a very fishy smell nowadays.

            2. BuK II
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              I love it in a live game when a player gets subbed at it says "distance covered". Utterly meaningless without context.

              Well done. You ran 8km around a football field in 70 mins. How does that compare to everyone else? Did you do anything useful? Could have ran the least on the pitch and been constantly chasing shadows!

          2. Camp No No
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            If Carroll and Downing were moneyball signings, then Liverpool's management are morons. Those are about the opposite to moneyball signings as I understand the term.

            1. BuK II
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Good chapter in "The Numbers Game" on this.

              In short, bought the best crosser and the best header in the EPL at the time. Problem is crossing and heading isn't an efficient way to score goals. Tactics have to be really geared towards pulling as many balls in the box as possible, which they weren't.

              1. Camp No No
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Yeah. Well, at least there is a strategy there. Although I would argue that those weren't necessarily even the best crosser and best header. They were the ones who did it most. And in any case, they overpaid heavily.

    14. SPFC
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      The fighting against the three title contenders, Leicester only lost a Vs Arsenal in Gameweek 7, with as yet undefined team.

      It's who has the strongest defense at the time, and knows how to play away from home as opposed to the City

      Two draws against City and Arsenal and they have all the conditions to win, while City, Tottenham and Arsenal are killed later.

    15. Zizoulicious
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      They most certainly can. I'd go as far to say that if they get 2 or more points out of the next two, then they have as good a chance as anyone of winning it.

      Their transition to a more defensive unit in the second half of the season is strikingly similar to Chelsea last year. As is their over reliance on a couple of quality players - Vardy, Mahrez and Kante are like Hazard, Matic and to a lesser extent Costa of last year. They have all the characteristics of title winners.

      Stats are useful when taken in the right context and interpreted. These stats just tell me that Ranieri has done a phenomenal plan in implementing a specific style of football that suits his players.

      Generally there is a trend from possession based football, to a counter attacking /pressing high energy game. Look at the failings of LvG's possession game and Arsenal's gentle move towards a more counterattacking style, not to mention the likes of Watford and `West Ham punching above their weight playing that way

      I think Ranieri has taken this style to the extreme, and has has got his players performing at a phenomenal level. Team spirit, belief and enjoyment are so high at Leicester - it's amazing what a little bit of confidence can do do you.

      In short, they can do it!!

      Also, check the table from when they started their run last year up until now. Almost a season full of games and they are still clear of City at the top!

    16. Eden Hazardous
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      STATS VS COMMON PEOPLE
      (look Balders is so high) 😛

      https://twitter.com/SteveLawrence_/status/695202483543658496

      First 10 models are stat models

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        These are predictions for the PL this season , higher the number , more accurate the predictions

      2. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        ^this. Suck that anti-stats "I watch them play" pundits.

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I don't even know what that link is trying to show - suck it!

          1. Ziro Becomes One
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            😀

          2. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Correlation with current league position

            1. andy85wsm
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              So all those guys predicted the league position for what end of the season? And that's how well their predictions are doing?

              I genuinely have no clue, not trying to be clever.

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Yes , you are correct . Our own Balders is 4th!!!!

                1. andy85wsm
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 13 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Nice work Balders

                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                League Points for all 20 teams. that number is the R-Squared of the correlation. 1.000 would be all 20 points exactly right. 0.0000 would be a monkey throwing darts and -1.0000 would be exactly wrong on every team.

                1. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Is a 0 correlation even possible?

                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Anywhere between -1 and 1 is possible.

                    1. Eden Hazardous
                      • 9 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      In terms of PL predictions I mean..as there are no negative values

                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        Well I think it just shows that people were generally sensible enough not to put Norwich, Villa and Sunderland in the CL spots while putting Man City, Chelsea and Arsenal in the relegation spots.

        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        **Stats Disclaimer**

        Most of the projections on here are stats models so having the top 10 as stats models isn't tooo surprising.

        **Balders Disclaimer**

        My model didn't like Chelsea selling Petr Cech and did like Leicester buying N'Golo Kante. One of these calls is working out for the wrong reason while the other one is working out way better than expected. Just having Leicester outside the relegation zone is a fair part of the reason I'm doing well on this list when so many people didn't give Leicester a chance.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Hahha..did I love that part out?

          So your stats model accounts for all players? Impressive.

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            *leave

            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            It does but its a really simple Team Rating model adjusting for Transfermarkt player values. For full disclosure it also liked Leicester Okazaki (~ +3 points), not selling anyone of note and disliked Chelsea not buying anyone of note (~ -4 points) before August 8th.

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Ah...who does it say will win the PL now?

                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                That's an interesting question but not one I've looked at since the January window closed. my gut says it'll spurt out Man City but I'm not sure.

                1. Eden Hazardous
                  • 9 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Pedro was -ve point?

                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 4 months ago

                    Pedro signed after I submitted my predictions as it was gameweek 3 before he signed so he had no impact either way. He would have had a +ive impact if he had signed before August 8th though.

                    1. Eden Hazardous
                      • 9 Years
                      8 years, 4 months ago

                      Ah..okay . Would love to know more about methodology . Have you written a blog post about it?

                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 4 months ago

                        I haven't, no as it largely piggy-backed off James Grayson's Team Ratings. All I did was adjust it for relative transfer net spend.

      3. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Well done, Balders!

        Interesting that Average Bookmakers was extremely close to Same as Last Season, and that Median Fans was better than Median Media, but both worse than Same as Last Season.

    17. badpiq
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Almost all stats are not representative with how the game works. Because it's just a model. The important thing is you have to watch and analysis the game.

      For xG map. That modelling method has a lot of weakness. A lot of team in Europe who play 'reactive football' usually has a low xG. Why? Because the value of xG is based on the location of the shot. For example, a counter attack team like Leicester, they don't need to take a shot in the opposition box when vardy/mahrez can shot from outside the box when the opposition's defence shape was unstructured. And that's also the reason why the team like Manchester City, Barcelona and Bayern Munich had very high xG. They are try to break the structured opposition's defence shape till can get the ball to the 16box even 6box.

      People nowadays are glorifying statistics too much after the story about moneyball in baseball. Especially, judging a team by its possession and pass completion or what else.

      I give you one example. Atletico Madrid is one of the best team in Europe right now (the best defence, absolutely). Their possession and pass completion, but they always win. Its because Diego Simeone's playing style to used a lot of 'pressing trap' in various zone on the pitch. Simeone give instruction to his team to often deliberately do wrong pass to specific zone that their shape has structured to win the second ball.

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Michael Caley's model accounts for these things

          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          It's also doing pretty badly in this 😉

          https://twitter.com/SteveLawrence_/status/695202483543658496

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            He adds a lot of weight to wages which have the least correlation this year

              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              That's true, maybe he should have had more faith in his unadjusted wage model then

        1. Zasa
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Indeed

    18. KISSES
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I hope so. I put £2 in on them pre season to win at 1000/1. Cashed out £100 profit after their tough Christmas period. Very nervous now...

    19. Silky_Smooth ~
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I find stats very useful for a first indication as to what players and teams I should be considering for my FPL team; however, I would never solely use stats to argue that a team isn't going to win unless the statistic being used is completely out of tune to what one would expect.

      Regarding pass completion and Leicester they play a style of play that is conducive of this. & regarding their high shot accuracy, I don't expect all teams' shot accuracy % to be equalised on average because each time has different players. You would expect Aguero to be much more accurate than Pelle for example, and this will be reflected through the team shot accuracy. Leicester have Vardy, who is a great finisher, so it is no surprise that their shot accuracy is high

    20. cowstria
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Maybe interesting: https://twitter.com/Goalimpact/status/694638058717736960

      Nice model to answer probabilities I think...

    21. Rainmaster
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Just look at their fixtures, Doos. After the next 2 games from which even if they manage to grab a single point (esp. v/s city), they have relatively easy fixtures until the last 3 when its likely that the teams they face may have nothing to play for - I'd bet on them winning the PL if Vardy and Mahrez stay fit.

      I hate to say this as a gooner, but I see them winning it!

    22. The_Socca_Philosopha
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Doosra- Noble Tango Patella Samba? More like Doosra - Crusher of Underdog Dreams 😉 😛

    23. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I have to agree really. With such poor passing stats I can't see them doing enough to win the league. They've done exceptionally well but at the end of the season, teams with better all round stats should come out on top. Doesn't always happen that way but to be at or near the bottom of the table for pass completion, it doesn't bode well for success.

    24. SneakyPete
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      just came here to lol

    25. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      What a load of nonsense

      and people wonder why they don't do well in FPL

      The game has changed from actually watching matches and noticing how well some teams/players actually are to just looking at some numbers and making stupid predictions

      1. Zasa
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I think you're exaggerating here tbh, you can do both effectively. Different ways to skin a cat, the game & sport evolves.

    26. Zasa
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      While I don't agree with your assessment here Doosra, & the amount of weight you put behind passing accuracy. I find it completely naive people in this day & age still can't come to terms with the fact that 'analytics' & statistics in football are utilized in nearly all echelons of the sport.

      We're in the 21st century now people, that sort of old-school & rigid mindset still baffles me.

      ...you can both watch the game & use statistics in tandem, why is there a need for people to bash stats as if they aren't effective? Surely there's a reason why the most successful clubs take these 'stupid stats' seriously, no?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhYRtQf_rBo

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I enjoyed that video 🙂

    27. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I'll make sure this is mentioned in the next round up. Looks to be an issue that will rumble on. Eye popping amount of comments since it was posted.

    28. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      This is a great example of why stats can't replace actually watching football.

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Yep, supplement but not replace.

    29. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Just out of interest I recreated Doosra's table and used it to compare Leicester's season so far this year against their season up to this point last year: http://i.imgur.com/bOLcUMD.png

      Interestingly, last season's Leicester are superior in half the stats in the table including the one which seems to have sparked the most discussion: Pass Completion. The major stats that have risen (aside from goals and assists) are chances created, through balls and shot accuracy.

      This season's Leicester are 5 points clear at the top of the table with 53 points from 25 games.

      Last season's Leicester were 4 points adrift at the foot of the table with 17 points from 25 games.

      Not sure what can be read into this but I guess my (enormously obvious) point is that stats are great and can be a massively helpful tool but drawing firm conclusions from them needs to be done extremely carefully.

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Compare shot accuracy for any team you want and you will find that high/low shot accuracies are not sustainable over seasons .

        Pass accuracy is a flawed stat on its own. Context is require either through video analysis or another statistical analysis

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          What do you consider high/low?

          Arsenal are on 35.6% this season and were on 35.7% for the same period last year (37% by the end of the season)

          Villa are on 29.8% this season and were on 26% for the same period last year (29.7% by the end of the season)

          I'm not disagreeing with the main thrust of your argument but a blanket statement that high/low shot accuracies aren't sustainable is a dangerous one 😉

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Arsenal and Villa are the two extremes and you chose wisely to support your argument. That is because of chance quality. Arsenal the best , Villa the worst

            Well done but the same doesn't apply to Spurs/Leicester imo

            1. GreenWindmill
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              You shouldn't have said "for any team you want" then 😉

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                😀

        2. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          And actually, the main point of my post was not to do with shot accuracy, it was just to show how many of the stats in Doosra's table favoured the 2014/15 Leicester and should therefore not be blindly trusted as a marker for how well a team is performing. (I think we agree 100% on this 🙂 )

  18. Chris_White
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Siggy(c)

    The joys of not playing this game serious anymore.

    1. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      He is a man in form.

      1. Chris_White
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Yep, and Palace are leaky

        1. Hooky
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Decent punt.

    2. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Very tempted to join you.

      1. Chris_White
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        We'll be laughing with our 16 pts 😉

        1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I don't know getting 16 points is not a very good score . I think you will get a massive red arrow . I consider 60 + to be a good gw tbh

    3. BabyB
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      that could be a great punt.

      Looks like Pardews second half slump is occurring as always and with McCarthur out, can see them shipping goals.

      Good luck!

  19. Eden Hazardous
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Paloschi in Serie A this season (minimum 15 appearances)

    Shots - 2.2 per 90 , Shots rank - 49th
    ITB - 1.8 per 90

    SoT - 0.9 per 90 , SoT rank - 33rd

    Goals per 90 - 0.4 , Goals rank - 14th

    Why so much hype? Seems like a mediocre player based on these stats unless somebody has actually watched him play 😉

    1. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      (C)

    2. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Played for an awful team apparently.

      Being rank 49th for shots but 14th for goals suggests he's a good finisher, no?

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Or on a hot finishing streak #unsustainable

        1. Wilshere Knowledge
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          But if we're talking about too small a sample size, you can't interpret him to be average based on the same stats, surely? 😉

          #backatya

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Err...20 games is large enough

            1. Wilshere Knowledge
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Large enough to infer mediocrity, but not large enough to infer him being a good finisher?

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Nope..as he did not do it last season or the season be4

    3. Uppercut Panda - A legend i…
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      the power of youtube highlight videos

    4. Nickofoz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      He "looked" good in his 50 minute cameo on his debut. You know how this site works, it's a similar story with Sanchez 😉

  20. Guy Demel's SH
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    I imagine this has been posted already, but just in case it hasnt...Martinez enjoying a bit of Derulo 😆

    https://twitter.com/LFCKOPVIEW/status/695383137841381378

  21. Ten Season Wonder
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    How do we all feel about Targett? He can just be my 5th defender. Free me up some funds too. If he plays, its a bonus, right?

    1. Cradders
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I don't see anything wrong with that, he's also guaranteed that his team will play GW30 I think.

      1. Numb
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        His team, yes

        1. Cradders
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          That is what I said, I'd rather have a player in a team that's guaranteed to play so having a 50/50 chance of playing than a player who's definitely going to blank

    2. Bibelnissen
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Blanks

    3. Numb
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Not with blanks approaching

    4. Guy Demel's SH
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      You probably want a full playing bench when blank gameweeks hit though

    5. Pochecinno
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      You'll need all the nailed-on players you can have with blanks coming up

  22. Cradders
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Anyone gonna be watching the SuperBowl on Sunday?? What do we think will be the result?

    1. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Broncos have the best defence, they stopped Brady, they'll stop Newton, defence wins superbowls

      1. The Algerian Dream
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Carolina's offense is so ridiculous though that I can't see them being limited to under 25. Also, their defense is decent and Manning has been known to choke in games like these so my money's on Carolina.

      2. Cradders
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I've gone Broncos +5.5 I think the game will be very tight

    2. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      No. No one outside America could care less about American rugby but as soon as Superbowl is on everyone seems to be all over it. Fake interest

      1. Your Mum's Athletic
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        so that's why they have games over at Wembley because their is 'no' interest 🙄 there are thousands and thousands of NFL fans in the UK

      2. Vincent Adultman
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Well i'm not the least bit interested in Athletics but i still watch the Olympics so I'm not sure what you're saying really works

        1. Cradders
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          That analogy. Amazing!! I have a team I follow, I don't watch it but I follow them, just like with NHL too, fake interest is a ridiculous thing to say

    3. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Nah. Boring has hell.

    4. Saint & Reevesy
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I hear they estimate that 2 billion chicken wings will be consumed that weekend.......

    5. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpOY4u8hL_E

      Panthers to win!

    6. Prøphet
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I am going to watch it and not sure the best defense can stop the best attack this season. I really think Broncos might lose it by 3 points or so. Very tight game in my eyes tho.

  23. Tshelby
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    G2G?

    Butland
    Cresswell, Bellerin, Toby
    Mahrez, Payet, Frimino, Alli, Ozil
    Kun, Kane

    Myhill-, Ighalo, Dann, Bennett

  24. Aguerrrooooooo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Do I bench Vardy or Mahrez?

    1. Cradders
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Vardy if it has to be one of them.

      1. HRISTO STOICHKOV
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I feel like I have to bench both of them..

      2. Aguerrrooooooo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        vardy it is then

    2. Bubz
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      mahrez

      1. Aguerrrooooooo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        yeah I guess Vardy is on penalties still right?

        1. Bubz
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Yeah. And better form.

          1. Cradders
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Vardy hasn't scored away from home in about 10 weeks, Mahrez has good returns away from home

    3. Vincent Adultman
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Neither? Fancy Leicester to get a good result against a shaky City defence

      1. Aguerrrooooooo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        tempted but i'd have to drop Payet for Mahrez if I did that. All my ML rivals have Payet

        1. Vincent Adultman
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Me too, I think i'm gonna go for it though unless it looks for any reason like he won't be played on the wing.

          1. Aguerrrooooooo
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            decisions decisions lol. will be a flip of a coint at 11:44am tomorrow

  25. HRISTO STOICHKOV
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Vardy

    1. Aguerrrooooooo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      vardy it is then

  26. Miro
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Bench one please:

    A) Alli
    B) Mahrez
    C) Payet

    1. Chris_White
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      B

      1. Springbank
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        This. First sub if Alli doesn't make it

    2. Sterling Chap
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      C - Based on form

    3. 1zverGGademN
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Bench one:

      Alli Mahrez Ozil Wijnaldum Payet

  27. HRISTO STOICHKOV
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    I feel like I have to bench both of them.

  28. Wilshere Knowledge
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Dat Guy:

    Arsenal FC ‏@Arsenal 1m1 minute ago
    .@Arsenal Under-21s starting XI: Macey, Da Graca, Bielik, Pleguezuelo, M.Bola, Nelson, McGuane, Bennacer, Willock, Welbeck, Mavididi #AFCU21

    1. Pochecinno
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Danny boy!

    2. Woy
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Pleguezuelo to get a hattie

    3. Give The Todd Some Love
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Forgot Bielik existed

  29. Saint & Reevesy
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Surely Kane has to be this weeks standout Captain option?

    1. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      ffs poll disagree.

    2. Bibelnissen
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      He is.

      Everyone putting their blindfolds on and saying Aguero though.

  30. DF
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Spurs rise higher than arsenal.
    Alli gets dizzy.

    1. Pochecinno
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      And we all collectively choke