The FA have this afternoon charged Sergio Aguero with alleged violent conduct following his altercation with Winston Reid in City’s 3-1 win over West Ham at the Etihad last weekend.
City’s top scorer now has until 6pm tomorrow to contest the charge and, if found guilty, is set to serve a three-match domestic ban.
He would sit out the Gameweek 4 and 5 encounters against United and Bournemouth, as well as City’s EFL Cup trip to Swansea on September 20.
Aguero would then be available for the Gameweek 6 visit to the Liberty four days later.
Given the nature of the altercation, Aguero’s flailing arm gives him little hope of avoiding suspension.
Owned by over 52% of Fantasy Premier League managers, he’s already suffered significant sales after withdrawing from Argentina duties with a calf problem.
Should confirmation come tomorrow, the exodus will kick into overdrive as we look to spend the budget freed up by his departure from our squads.
For the 43.2% who don’t yet own him, Zlatan Ibrahimovic offers an easy swap for those who are seeking a place-holder for the City striker.
Chelsea’s Diego Costa looks reinvigorated under Antonio Conte and, along with Wayne Rooney, is one of only two forwards to produce returns in each of the first three Gameweeks.
The Aguero news comes at a time where Eden Hazard and Alexis Sanchez served a reminder of their big-hitter potential in midfield with double-figure weekend returns.
Whilst the temptation to invest the Aguero funds heavily in midfield is strong, keeping the door open for an easy return looks a wise move given his form under Pep Guardiola.
7 years, 9 months agoHow far do people think Aguero's price will drop before he returns? (If he is banned of course, though I know he probably will be)
If he drops to £12.8, I can safely buy McAuley and benefit from price rises.
However, if he only drops to £12.9 I'll have trouble bringing him back if I opt for McAuley and I would have to go for Evans.
It seems reasonable to think that Aguero might drop by £.3 over 3 weeks and 2 game weeks, no?