Community

FPL Market Analysis

FPL Market Analysis

Being able to read the FPL player market is a vital part of playing the game and it is important that managers have as good an understanding of it as possible in order to achieve the best possible final ranking. Knowing how the market works will allow you to keep as much of your starting 100M budget intact as possible, and we all know how frustrating it is in the latter stages of the season when we find ourselves 0.1M short of a player we desperately want to add to our squad. Therefore in this article I will analyse the general trends of market movement over the past few seasons before going into detail looking at how players in certain price points tend to be affected. Here is a link to an article summarising how we believe price changes in the game work that will be useful to look at prior to reading this, if you are not already aware of how they work: https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/08/12/fantasy-premier-league-transfer-market-guide/

General Trends

There is a very definite trend that has emerged over the past few years and it shows that the total value of the FPL market decreases throughout the season as shown by this table:

SeasonNet Market Loss/MTotal Players in Game% Players Decreasing% Players Increasing
15/16149.7723716
16/17128.8683696
17/1898.7647668

We can see that there is a significant loss in market value over the course of a season and while it appears as though this net loss is decreasing this can be partly put down to the fact that the total players has also decreased over the past 3 seasons. What is perhaps most striking is that over 65% of players experienced a decrease in price in each of the three seasons whereas a maximum of 8% finished the season at a price above their start price. This clearly shows us that the days of using a wildcard to gain squad value are very much over and what we instead face is a season long battle to try to maintain squad value in order to maximise the quality of players we can afford for our squad.

Why are the Opening Gameweeks so Crucial?

It is vital to pick the best squad that you can at the start of an FPL season not only in terms of points scoring but also in terms of maintaining squad value for later in the season. This is because the market is extremely volatile to begin with as managers jump on form players and get rid of gambles resulting in 30% of all price changes occurring during the first 6 gameweeks of the season. Coming off the back of a World Cup summer this volatility could be even more extreme as managers drop short term options for premium players that have been rested for the opening matches. In the upcoming analysis I will look at how players in different positions at certain price points tend to change in price. It is worth noting that all of the data is taken from across a full season but due to the amount of activity that occurs in the opening weeks it is most certainly valid and should be considered when picking a starting squad if you want to maintain as much value as possible.

Goalkeepers

All data is taken from across the previous 3 FPL seasons combined.

PriceSample SizeNet Change/M% Players Decreasing% Players IncreasingBiggest Price Drop
5.5M+15+0.54040Bravo 0.5M

16/17

5M45-9.8827Karius 0.7M

16/17

4.5M76-9.36811Adrian 0.5M

17/18

4M75-1.3245Schwarzer 0.3M

15/16

While the sample of premium 5.5M+ goalkeepers is small, it is evident that they tend to maintain their price much better than other starting goalkeepers who would mainly be found at either 4.5M or 5M. The 4M goalkeepers, who are generally 2nd and 3rd choices for their respective clubs, tend to have little price movement with over 70% maintaining their start price through the season. This means that the conclusion to be made from a value perspective is that by far the safest option is to pick a “set and forget” premium goalkeeper paired with a 4M bench player. The other popular strategy is to rotate two cheaper goalkeepers who appear to have favourable opening fixtures but this is risky as a slow start for either or both of your keepers could see early price drops as managers move to replace them in favour of goalkeepers from teams who have racked up early clean sheets.
In the past two seasons the two Burnley goalkeepers, Heaton and Pope have both shown that profitable options can emerge from the 4.5M bracket both experiencing a price rise of 0.5M+ in the seasons when they were first choice. This is an example of where a rotating pair including one of these two was a good option, but it is still a gamble as it is unlikely many managers will have started with these players and committing early transfers on goalkeepers in order to follow market movement is not ideal.

Defenders

PriceSample SizeNet Change/M% Players Decreasing% Players IncreasingBiggest Price Drop
6M+50-2.76026Rahman 0.6M

15/16

5.5M78-9.96923Jones 0.8M

15/16

5M134-26.5828Gabriel 0.7M

15/16

4.5M251-46767Kenny 0.6M

17/18

4M145-5.2283Oxford 0.3M

15/16

Again as you would expect the premium defensive options show the most price stability with a smaller percentage of decreases than all other prices except 4M and more increases than all other brackets, although they are quite closely matched by players in the 5.5M range. Therefore defenders at top clubs priced at 5.5M such as Eric Bailly at Manchester United should be considered if they emerge as regular starters. Defenders at 5M and 4.5M are not good at holding value although it is worth noting that a smaller percentage of 4.5M defenders decrease and only 1% less increase. Most clubs outside of the top 6 will have starting options at 4.5M so it is perhaps advisable to pick one of these if you want a defender from a certain club. This way you save 0.5M to invest elsewhere and also the player is slightly more likely to hold his value. As with the goalkeepers, nearly 70% of 4M options retain their value as most do not get much playing time. This is why there is great excitement over the potential of Aaron Wan-Bissaka starting for Crystal Palace as a 4M bench option who is getting game time is an invaluable bonus for FPL managers as he would offer potential points and also price stability.

Midfielders

PriceSample SizeNet Change/M% Players Decreasing% Players IncreasingBiggest Price Drop
9M+20-2.95530Mkhitaryan 0.8M

16/17

7.5-8.5M57-127421Walcott 0.9M

17/18

6-7M126-43.9904Deulofeu 0.9M

15/16

4.5-5.5M640-128721Stanislas 0.9M

16/17

The most expensive midfielders show the best value retention however there are some interesting examples within this bracket that are worth looking at in more detail. In the 16/17 season Dele Alli and Alexis Sanchez finished as the top 2 players in the game scoring 225 and 264 point respectively and both ending the season with an ownership of around 30%. I do not have the data for what their ownership levels were at the start of the next season but it is fair to assume they will have been reasonably high. Both players failed to reach the same heights in 17/18 with Alli scoring 175 points and Sanchez, whose season was disrupted by his transfer to Manchester United, scoring 152 points so still reasonably good seasons for each. However they ended the season as the biggest fallers in price among premium midfielders Alli losing 0.5M in value and Sanchez 0.6M after being the biggest price gainers in 16/17. This is perhaps something to be wary of when picking Salah in your starting team, although his probable ownership of over 50% should prevent a rapid decrease in price.

All of the other price brackets show the expected pattern and further breaking down the cheapest bracket to include only 4.5M players shows that over 40% of them hold their value. This again highlights the importance of picking these budget players alongside premium options when building your midfield for the best chance of maintaining squad value.

Forwards

PriceSample SizeNet Change/M% Players Decreasing% Players IncreasingBiggest Price Drop
9M+21+0.45233Rooney 0.6M

15/16

6.5-8.5M84-31.4905Rondon 1.1M

15/16

4.5-6M215-45.1683Origi 1M

15/16

The premium forwards again show the expected result but the bracket I want to particularly focus on here is the middle one. At time of writing Wilfried Zaha and Marko Arnautovic both priced at 7M sit in over 25% of teams. They both performed extremely well last season and hence many managers are backing them to repeat that again this season. However the data about forwards in this price bracket shows that they usually turn out to be gambles that don’t pay off and of players that decrease in price they lose an average of 0.4M in value each. Examples from previous seasons include Gabbiadini who ended 17/18 down 0.8M from his start price and Ighalo who decreased by 0.7M in 16/17 following his great year in 15/16.

Beware the Promoted Clubs

Many managers often take a punt on players from the three clubs promoted from the championship especially ones who performed well in helping their club to promotion. This is shown this year by Ryan Sessegnon, Ruben Neves and Diogo Jota who are all currently among the top 20 selected midfielders in the game. In 17/18 Matt Ritchie and Anthony Knockaert came up with big expectations but both ended the season more than 0.5M below their start price. Dwight Gayle, Tom Ince and Mohamed Diame were also significant losers. Looking back to the promoted clubs in 16/17, Stuart Downing, Andre Gray and Jordan Rhodes all fell significantly. Therefore I would urge managers to maybe consider more established and perhaps less selected midfield talent rather than taking gambles on newcomers.

What does all this mean?

As with most things in FPL, analysing the numbers in this area put the premium players on top but we cannot select a squad entirely consisting of them so what does it suggest in terms of the best squad balance for maintaining value. As a rough idea I would suggest avoiding mid-priced options as much as possible in both midfield and attack in favour of fitting in premium players alongside useful budget options that you expect to get game time.

Finally it is important to keep the market and its fluctuations in mind at all times especially at the start of the season. By keeping an eye on transfers in and out you may be able to avoid losing squad value by transferring players at the right time. It is important to bear this in mind if starting the season with a player who you expect to get a run of games due to one of his teammates returning late from the World Cup. By keeping an eye on his ownership and transfers you can sell him at the right time and bring in your desired replacement avoiding the situation where you find yourself 0.1M short of the player you planned to bring in. In terms of using your wildcard this data shows that if you have made 3 or 4 picks who have got off to a slow start it is certainly best to use an early wildcard in order to avoid significant losses that could have a negative effect on your whole season.

39 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Geoff
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Cheers for the hard work 🙂

    Definitely agree that it'll be more volatile this year than previous years

    I'm watching Pogba's change in value closely, as well as Sanchez and the United boys.

    This convinces me even more that I'll be forced into an early wildcard, but makes me happier to do it to maintain value

    1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      I am not sure an early wildcard is a necessity.
      You can just phase players in if you have a flexible enough team structure.
      I just plan to get the value arsenal players in then it will allow me to

      1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 9 months ago

        *get the likes of Kane.

    2. Rossi3254
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks 🙂

      1. Thomas Jerome Newton
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 9 months ago

        Just read the article. Excellent stuff.

  2. Mikeharbrw
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Great stuff cheers

  3. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Brilliant Article! Cheers 😀

  4. Mikeharbrw
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Dream scenario is that KDB doesnt start GW1 and the 30 odd % people that own him sell in droves and send his price down.

    1. POLSKA GOLA
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Very true, I’m set on starting with Aguero as my City attack but let’s see how CS goes

    2. Maddi Son
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Very likely to happen.

    3. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Looking at the ownership there are going to be a lot of shocked Maguire/Trippier owners as well.
      It will be interesting to see how much they drop.

  5. jpb333
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Excellent article. thank you

  6. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    I honestly think this is the best article I have read.
    Stats with an actual purpose.
    And unlike the pr vious article Andre Gray is mentioned and not erased from history!

    I think the artcle proves that getting Salah is a bad idea because if he blanks two gameweeks in a row there could be a severe drop in price (I don't have salah 😀 )

    Delighted with this article because it confirmed my thoughts I decided to try and get premium defenders/mids and strikers (bar Gray)
    So my bench is just 4.5 mids wan-bissaka and a 4.0 keeper.

    1. Rossi3254
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers mate!
      I dont have Salah either but I dont think he will drop too much if he does blank as based off his 50% ownership and 5 million players by the time the game starts he would probably need a net 250,000 transfers out for a 0.1M drop

    2. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Salah didn't drop last year even when he got injured and was sold a lot.

      Nice article, but it is not only avoiding players whose price might drop, it is also choosing the potential bandwagons. Early wc is one strategy, but this season start is different because of the other wc. So market may be different early this season.

      There can be for example mass sales for those who return late from wc. FPL towers may protect them from falling in price, but should injuries occur during first game after return we may see fast price drops. Therefore these late returners will be serious risk to choose if they have lost ownership.

  7. JoeJitzu +42
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Nice Article, well done!

  8. OPTA FPL
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Recently lots of article suggest investing on premium defenders. Question is, how many premium defenders should i get? 1? 2 or 3? Any further analytic?

    1. Rossi3254
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Personally I have 2 at the moment and then im planning a 3 team rotation with my budget defenders altho I think 3 premium is defo a good option espcially if you can pick out top 6 clubs defenders that are likely to be regulars at 5.5M or 5M and have 3 of them

  9. Markus
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    I disagree to some degree on security of premium options as I think this is a large part due to there being more risky mid-price options that almost before the season starts you could say they will lose value whereas less likely in premium bracket: eg son, lamela, giroud, martial, mata, rashford, shaqiri, moura would all strike me as certain losses, likewise all the low budget players who don't get a game.

    But very interesting reminder re promoted players (and anyone else you think, well they're low risk as a punt), as I think all of our mindsets are - I'll go with jota/cairney etc as they're low risk and can always transfer them out - which suggests.

    To add to this gw3 always seems the highest losses, so an argument for wildcard around here particularly if you can get the turn in the market around the premium wc returners.

    0.1 loss at this stage of the season, I calculate as about 1.5 points potential over the season so not insignificant if it adds up, but also not to completely obsess over.

    1. Markus
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Should say thanks for the article though, is really good, and may well affect my picks by playing it safer rather than gambling on rises

      1. Rossi3254
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers and yh I think its very difficult to pick rises before the season starts but it is important to jump on one early if it is possible to do so and you think the player can maintain the form

    2. Rossi3254
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Yh I agree with what you are saying about the premium options obviously they arent all secure as it depends on form but in terms of the general pattern they do fare significantly better.
      The 0.1M loss certainly isnt too much of an issue but the market needs to be watched closely as I see a lot of people in RMTs saying they plan to swap say Mahrez to KdB when he returns by leaving some money in the bank but if they arent careful and follow the market they could end up short of funds to be able to make the change with one transfer

      1. Baps hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 9 months ago

        Yet, it is only some here. Mahrez is much more likely a bandwagon, at least if he plays and gets points. KdB not starting is going to mean casuals forced to sell him after gw1. Tsb%:

        KdB 28.2
        Mahrez 4.6 (and flagged now)

        1. SwissWavey
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 9 months ago

          How much evidence is there to support that? I know there are some casuals who lose interest after 6 weeks but most casuals I know don't make any transfers at all. Ever. And the other ones about once a month only after they read about Aguero scoring 4 in one game, or similar

  10. Toblerone52 - Zlatan Ibra-H…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Great read thanks! Premiums the way to go everywhere then

  11. FPLzebub
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    This is my favourite kind of article. There are too few general strategy articles on this site let alone ones looking at the very interesting mechanics of the price change system. Some of the most important factors in the FPL season is how volatile the price change algorithm is and whether cheap must have players emerge that make chasing a high SV unnecessary. Thanks for this article - very helpful.

  12. Petrichor II
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    What site is the most accurate to see price rise or drop?

    I think at least there are two.. Or more site have feature like this?

    1. Petrichor II
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 9 months ago

      Ok found it.

      1. SirT83
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 9 months ago

        Sharing is caring!

  13. RedLightning
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Many players whose prices drop are mainly owned by casuals and dead teams; experienced players tend to select fewer of these in their initial squads.

    Dead teams are likely to see their squad value drop, but active teams will normally increase in value.

    This is because active teams are able to sell players who are about to drop and to buy players who are likely to rise.

    Also, some players will rise in value, get injured and then fall. Active teams are able to benefit from the rise in value and then sell before the fall becomes too great.

    By the end of the season, most of the players who have fallen in value will no longer be in active teams, and many of the most popular players will have risen in value.

    Losing squad value is rarely a problem for active players - the bigger problem is increasing it sufficiently to still be able to afford the players who have risen in price.

  14. WesMantooth
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Really nice article! Well done! 😀

    One thing im struggling with thoug....
    I find it hard to believe that the force that effet ownership at the start of the season will be the same force that affects the initial pricechanges.

    What i'm getting at, is that the managers that have pushed the likes of Kane, Maguire, Trippier, KDB to the top of ownership, are likely to be the Kind of manager that wont be as invested in the game as those visiting FFS and other fantasycommunities.

    Don't get me wrong, a large exodus will surely take place. Maybe just not to the extent people are speculating at.

    I, for one, feel that its those semi-high Owner players, who looks like their highly owned when going through the rmt's on ffs, that looks most dangerous with regards to dropping. Meaning: Mendy and PVA might be more at risk of loosing value than Maguire and trippier, mane more at risk than Salah, Zaha and Aguero more at risk than Kane.

  15. brianutd-why always we? 20
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Very helpful article thanks, some of which confirms my thinking. I’m always trying to protect my first WC to Xmas time, might mix it up this year if I start slowly cheers

  16. Je suis le chat
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Got to love Mendy. He's played 8 times for France and has a World cup medal, played 7 times for City and has a PL medal.

  17. Weak Become Heros
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Very good article, cheers mate.

  18. Ógie
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Excellent article Rossi.

    Very interesting numbers there.Playing the market is half the battle in FPL.

  19. Marmalade Forest
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Top article, thanks.

    Being a negative nelly, it would be nice to see net value change as a % of total value and top price risers in their groups.

  20. darrellb
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    great article. not good reading for someone with 3 6-7 mil mids and one fwd

  21. Ini
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 9 months ago

    Thank you!!!!!!!