Members

FPL tools: Tips on how to best use Rate My Team for Gameweek 1 planning

There is a vast array of tools available in Fantasy Football Scout’s Premium Members Area that can help Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers with their planning ahead of the new season.

Having explored the ‘per 90’ search filter and the ‘flat-track bully’ feature previously, today we provide tips on how managers can best make use of the Rate My Team (RMT) tool.

RMT is available only with a Premium Membership – and you can get 20% off by signing up for a full year today.

Sanity Check

The RMT can help guide our team selection by supplying a Gameweek-by-Gameweek points projection for each player.

Raphinha’s point projections for the first six Gameweeks

The estimated values are an average of what we can expect. They include every possibility from the player scoring a hat-trick to being sent off or coming on as a sub.

The RMT factors in all the different ways a player can earn or lose points.

By relying on hard data it gives us a counter to the hype and excitement that can distort our perception. As former FPL winner Simon March recently explained:

Irrational exuberance causes us to rely on unreliable prospects and it prevents us from seeing what is truly in front of us.

– Simon March, How to avoid getting carried away with your GW1 picks

The RMT provides a dispassionate sounding board for our transfer dilemmas.

Bruno or Bru’NO’?

During pre-season the RMT is useful for comparing different drafts – could we really do better without Bruno Fernandes (£12.0m) in our starting XI?

In his interview last Friday, Mark omitted the Portuguese from his team:

Interestingly, despite Mark setting up his team in a 3-5-2 formation, the RMT recommends benching Brentford midfielder Bryan Mbeumo (£5.5m) in favour of defender Vladimír Coufal (£5.0m). 

It gives this 4-4-2 line-up a projected score of 60 points for Gameweek 1 and close to 345 points for opening half dozen fixtures.

Meanwhile Tom’s recent draft features three premium-priced players with Son Heung-min (£10.0m) joining Mohamed Salah (£12.5m) and Fernandes.

Over the first six matches Tom’s side is projected to score a rounded up total of 348 points, nearly three more than Mark’s “BruNO” side.

This is largely due to his three premiums sharing the captaincy:

However, despite faring worse in the medium term, Mark’s Gameweek 1 team outscores Tom’s by 60 points to 58.

The RMT highlights the different approaches between these two elite managers, especially around their attitude to transfers and captaincy. As Mark explains:

I’m getting Mané for the early period, when I think he will play, and then probably getting rid in Gameweek 3 or 4 … people saying “oh don’t book out transfers”, yeah fine but what’s the difference between planning and booking out transfers? 

… there’s nothing wrong with looking ahead and going “right, in Gameweek 3 I could do this, in Gameweek 4 I could do this” – because I do think, hopefully, this season gives us lots of options and, in a season where you’ve got lots of options, I’m hoping that it gives something to the managers who are a bit more gutsy and a bit more dynamic and fluid with their lineups.

– Mark, Team Reveal

Whereas Tom is much more cautious with his premium assets, preferring to use the majority of his transfers on mid-priced midfielders:

You don’t want to get caught out by those guys, those big hitters you’re going to captain, personally I don’t move them around too much. And it’s that position, which is a fourth midfielder slot for me, it’s just a good price point, you can have a bit of fun with it, I don’t get attached to value, you can be aggressive … I think you can get away with it because these players aren’t going to be widely captained.

– Tom, Meet the Manager

Both these managers have been very successful with their contrasting playing styles: Tom’s achieved five top 1,000 finishes to Mark’s ten top 5,000 end-of-season ranks. But, whichever approach you prefer, the RMT can evaluate your squad’s points potential.

Building a draft

To begin, select the the Rate My Team tool from the Members’ Home menu.

Then, from the dropdown, choose ‘Build My Team‘.


Finally, select your players one-by-one from the ‘Add Player’ dropdown.

FPL tools: Tips on how to use our Rate My Team tool 4


When you have a valid squad consisting of two goalkeepers, five defenders, five midfielders and three forwards, the RMT will give you weekly totals and suggest a captain, vice-captain and bench.

Once a team is built, it can be saved and shared by bookmarking the URL.

Here are the links to Mark‘s and Tom‘s teams if you want to have a tinker.

The recommended captain pick is indicated by a small ‘c‘ after the Gameweek points projection.

Vice-captain by the letter ‘v‘, and your bench in order of preference: ‘b1‘, ‘b2‘, ‘b3‘, with the letter ‘b‘ highlighting the sub-goalkeeper.


In the example above, despite Michael Obafemi (£4.5m) having a lower projected points tally than Andrew Omobamidele (£4.0m), the RMT suggests putting him ahead of the Norwich defender on the bench.

The reason for this is that Obafemi’s total is reduced because he’s not expected to play. However, in the unlikely scenario that he does feature, he’s the better pick.

Obafemi (left) is given an expected minutes (xM) of just four, this accounts for all possible minutes he’s likely to get. In the Premier League he’s averaged 26 minutes per appearance. Should he play, his underlying points projection (adjP) is better than Omobamidele (right). Rollover a player’s projected score to reveal their adjP and xM.

So the RMT thinks it’s worth putting Obafemi in the second bench spot to make use of his superior underlying points projection (‘adjP’ in the image above) should he play. Otherwise the safer option of Omobamidele will autosub in.

And your substitutes do contribute towards your estimated Gameweek score: points from your bench are calculated based on starting probabilities. The RMT works out how many players on average won’t play, and how many points you could get from your subs.

Under the Hood

The Rate My Team tool was created by Cambridge mathematics graduate Chris Atkinson (aka RMT’s Professor), who used to work for ATASS Sports, a statistical research consultancy providing modelling and analysis for the sports industry.

The RMT uses three main components to arrive at its points projections:

  • The team model
  • Player rates
  • Playing probabilities

The team model works out, among other things, the amount of goals it expects a team to score in a match. It considers the strength of a team’s attack against the quality of the opposition’s defence.

The percentage chance of a clean sheet is predicted along with details such as save points and own goal probabilities.

The RMT also considers that yellow and red cards are more likely to go to the side doing more defending.

The overarching element, the thing that’s holding it together, is our team numbers, which we think are really really good evidenced by the fact that they are so close to the betting market.

– Chris Atkinson, creator of the RMT

Within each team, player rates are assigned to every aspect of points scoring including goals, assist and bonus points.

This is determined by a player’s position on the pitch and historical performance – if they have scored lots of goals in the past the model thinks they are more likely to score goals in future.

The final aspect of the RMT asks: how likely is a player to get on the pitch?

To get the best answer to that question requires some manual input.

Human touch

Every week we come up with the short term probabilities of players starting.

Neale‘s predicted line-ups, rated the best and most reliable team predictions for FPL, are crucial for arriving at our expected minute values.

On Fantasy Football Scout’s site they go into some depth on the latest news and manager news conferences which is a clear indication of the time and attention to detail that they put into their predictions and this is paying off with their results.

– Footstock

We also tell the RMT about suspensions, injuries, and a change in penalty takers.

A lot of work goes into keeping the RMT informed of the latest developments and its predictions will inevitably be more accurate closer to the deadline.

The Assistant Manager

All this knowledge combines to make the RMT every FPL manager’s perfect assistant.

You can use it to work out defensive rotations, build Free Hit and Wildcard squads, and help you find the best value players.

Filter players and select your Gameweek range

The ‘Players‘ section of the RMT assesses all Premier League players and lists them by expected points total. Fantasy Football Scout subscribers can also choose to order by Gameweek, price or value (total points divided by price).

Filters may be applied for club, position, and price. It’s even possible to limit the range to specific Gameweeks.

Best value defenders over the opening four Gameweeks

Once the season starts, instead of having to build a team from scratch, Premium Members will be able to enter their FPL IDs to add their current squads.

When making transfers, managers will see a before and after points tally. Is that four-point hit likely to pay off?

Points estimates Before and After Transfers

Throughout the campaign, the Rate My Team tool can help you form an opinion about players and keep you grounded in reality. It might be called Fantasy football but that doesn’t mean our players are going to get double-digit hauls every week.

TopMarx Fan of Fantasy Football and Monty Python. "Archimedes out to Socrates, Socrates back to Archimedes, Archimedes out to Heraclitus, he beats Hegel. Heraclitus a little flick, here he comes on the far post, Socrates is there, Socrates heads it in! Socrates has scored! The Greeks are going mad, the Greeks are going mad! Socrates scores, got a beautiful cross from Archimedes. The Germans are disputing it. Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside. Follow them on Twitter

2,401 Comments Post a Comment
  1. circusmonkey
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Auction league team, 15 of us (dilution of quality: competition): Pickford, Veltman, Castagne, Dawson, Keane, Westwood, Redmond, Bowen, Willock, Sterling, Greenwood, Havertz, Maupay, Adams, Ayew.

    I guess you want to see everyone else's, sorry, don't have them.

  2. MOZIL
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    a) Havertz + Grealish + Toney
    or
    b) Benrahma + Mahrez + Ings

    1. Steiger
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B as unsure Grealish minutes to start.

    2. FFSbet.com
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

  3. OptimusBlack
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Can you rate my template team
    Sanchez
    TAA Tsimikas Shaw
    Salah Bruno Mahrez Benrahma Barnes
    Toney Antonio

    Foster - Coufal - Amartey- Obafemi

    1. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Very similar to mine below man! So i like it 🙂

    2. FFSbet.com
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Looks good

      I would only change Coufal + Amartey to 2 x 4.5

      You can end up with 3 bench fodders by GW3

    3. Stupendous
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Template

    4. FourLokoLeipzig
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Very similar to mine so I like it too. Only differences are that I’ve gone with Bachman in goal, Sancho over Mahrez, and White over Coufal (I think Coufal’s a great option though)

    5. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      template

  4. McGinn
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Locked and ready to go.

    Sanchez
    Digne - Shaw - Coufal
    Smith Rowe - Son - Salah - Bruno (c) - Grealish
    Antonio - Ineanacho

    Bench:
    Foster, Amartey, Tsimikas, Perica.
    GTG?

  5. FFSbet.com
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Is Amartey sure to start GW1?

    Want to use BB

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      No

  6. Salah’s Sonnet
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Pretty set on my team, but which option from A or B would you prefer below? Cheers.

    Sanchez
    TAA - Shaw - Tsimikas
    XXX - Salah - Mahrez - Bruno - Barnes
    Antonio - XXX
    _______________________________
    Foster: White: Amartey: Perica

    A) Harrison + Wilson

    B) Raphinha + Toney

    Thanks guys.

    1. Steiger
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

      1. Salah’s Sonnet
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Thnx bud

    2. KAPO KANE
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

      But considering the rest of your midfield, I’d go with a 5.5 like Mbuemo & Ings

      1. Salah’s Sonnet
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Cheers KK! Yeah i do really want Ings as well, good shout cheers pal

    3. FourLokoLeipzig
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Easy B

      1. Salah’s Sonnet
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Cheers man

  7. Kane Train
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Is Greenwood nailed?

    1. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Yes. Should be for at least the first 3 gameweeks.

  8. JONALDINHO
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    How would you shave 0.5 off this?

    Sanchez
    Trent • Shaw • Tsimi
    Salah • Bruno • Mahrez • Barnes • Raph
    Ings • Antonio
    (Steele / Amartey / Omo / Obafemi)

    1. Flair
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Barnes -> Toney

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Raph to Ben, Ings to Wilson, or Barnes to Greenwood

    3. Kun Tozser
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Ralph > Harrison

    4. Threat Level Midnight
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Ralph>Sarr

    5. Goodfeathers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Ings to C Wilson?

  9. FPL Theorist
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    What will it take to get El Ghazi out of the Villa XI so Ings can take pens?

    1. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Do we even know if Ings will start?

      1. Kiwivillan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        He will as Watkins has a bone bruise and may not be ready for Watford. Also we didn't just spend 25 million on a 29 year old to bench him

        1. Amartey Partey
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          So Watkins is out?

          1. waldo666
            • 13 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            Dean Smith says he expects him to start against Watford.

            1. Amartey Partey
              • 4 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              Yeah, but he might be trying to dupe the opposition.

      2. FPL Theorist
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        He played the friendly, and all the quotes I've seen suggest Smith plans to start Watkins and Ings as a front two in either a 4-4-2, 4-diamond-2, or 3-5-2. Have seen conflicting suggestions on exactly which formation.

        1. Amartey Partey
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          You know that 3-5-2 might be a good call as Villa did just sign Tuanzebe as a third CB. A 4-4-2 just seems a strange decision as it doesn't generally work as well against 4-3-3 or 3-5-2.

          1. FPL Theorist
            • 4 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            Found this thread: https://twitter.com/FPLVillan/status/1425473860640649220

            They seem pretty convinced on 4-4-2, with Bailey replacing El Ghazi on the wing once ready. Buendia on the other wing when fit. McGinn and Nakamba central.

            1. Amartey Partey
              • 4 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              I guess it just means Ings or Watkins will play deeper in the number 10 role?

            2. Kiwivillan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              A Villa fan with a twitter account that doesn't seem to know much. We won't play orthodox 442 as don't have the wingers for it. We have inside forwards suited to 433/4231 Bailey and Buendia have come from playing on the right although based on pre-season game I think Buendia will play free role in a middle.

              1. Amartey Partey
                • 4 Years
                2 years, 10 months ago

                If Buendia is playing a free role in the middle wouldn't that be overboard with central attacking players having both Ings and Watkins there too.

                Asking all of this because I'm deciding between Ings and Wilson.

        2. Kiwivillan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Smith also said he could play 3 up front so the Bailey signing and Traore in the squad I think we will play 433 when everyone is available Watkins Ings Bailey(Traore)

        3. Kiwivillan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          We won't play 352. The wing backs would be Targett and Cash so why did we sign inside forward Bailey to go with Traore and AEG. If Watkins and Ings wre front 2 in 352 that leaves 2 places for Mcginn Buendia Nakamba Luiz Bailey Traore AEG plus several youth players that will be in squad

          1. FPL Theorist
            • 4 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            Great, much appreciated!

          2. Amartey Partey
            • 4 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            True. That makes sense. Do you think Ings will then play a little deeper behind Watkins?

  10. Davidwes
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Which combo?
    A) Mahrez, Toney in a 343
    B) Gundogan, Greenwood in a 352

  11. mitro
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    ESR or Harrison?

    Cheers lads!

    1. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Harrison

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Although ESR probably better option for GW1.

  12. smix
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    A. Bamford & Benrahma or
    B. Antonio & Raphina

    1. Goodfeathers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

  13. Threat Level Midnight
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Settled on…

    Sanchez
    TAA-Shaw-Digne-Coufal
    Salah-Mane (C)- Greenwood
    Toney-Ings-Antonio

    Dallas, Amartey, Gilmour, Gunn.

    Talk to you all in 2 days

    1. MFC86
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I like this team, I’m currently on 4-3-3 as well

  14. -SANDSTORM-
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Shaw will flop 1st wk an Leeds defo score ....you heard it here first

    1. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Can I have Saturday's lottery numbers?

      1. -SANDSTORM-
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        7 11 12 24 36 42

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Can't see Shaw flopping. He has been improving every game. Should be better this season too with the new set-piece coach at United. I agree that Leeds will score though.

      1. -SANDSTORM-
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        its not that that i dislike Shaw , hes an excellent player and option but as you said Leeds prob' score so no CS and folk getting carried away with last season and euros form. Be better in few wks , only my opinion of course

        1. Amartey Partey
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          He has a good chance of getting an assist though as he's on free-kicks and corners. And then his following 3 fixtures he has a great chance of getting clean sheets.

  15. jaguar shark
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Odd not to see Ziyech in teams? The guy can’t stop scoring in preseason!

    1. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      He got injured today. Dislocated shoulder I think.

  16. Obi-1 Kenobi-0
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    I logged in hoping to see some conversation on Watkins + £0.5m vs Ings after Dean Smith’s comments today.

    For me, Smith saying “I didn’t want an over-reliance on Ollie Watkins’ goals if Jack left”, alongside saying he doesn’t want to play him out wide, suggests to me that Watkins is still the main man and that Ings will probably play either alongside or just behind him as a 10.

    That £0.5m saving could be huge for my team in upgrading a £4.0m defender to a playing £4.5m.

    1. FPL Theorist
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Yeah, I got Ings in right away when he signed, expecting pens, but now I'm thinking about going back to Watkins.

      See thread above for Kiwivillan's insight.

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      "Villa's new £25million man was in alongside Watkins from the off - although the ex-Saints man dropped deep when Villa didn't have the ball."

      Read this in the notes after their last game. Sounds like he will be playing in the number 10 role.

      1. Kiwivillan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        That's possible as would be basically playing Barkley role from last season except Ings isn't lazy off the ball like Barkley. Their heat maps aren't that dissimilar

    3. waldo666
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Agreed, I just swapped Ings back to Watkins myself.

      1. Gabbiadini
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        is it this clear?

        1. waldo666
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Until they take the pitch we can only go from the information provided and as we can see by the comments, that information can draw different conclusions. I took them as positive enough signs that Watkins is just as good if not a better option than Ings. Time will tell ofc.

    4. Flair
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I'm not 100% on him starting so I'm just on Wilson instead.

    5. Kiwivillan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      People leave out what Smith said after he said he's not shifting him wide on the left

      "We could play three up front with the players we have now, we could play two up front, or one up top with a short striker."

      I think Smith doesn't see a front 3 as wide on left or right for the 2 inside forwards

      1. Obi-1 Kenobi-0
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        So what would your view be on the topic in hand? I’ll be wildcarding for GW7, so do you think Watkins + £0.5m or Ings are better value to start the season.

        I definitely want one of them to hit those plum Villa fixtures.

        1. Kiwivillan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          I'm on Ings as way better conversion rate than Watkins

    6. GreennRed
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Ings is a striker. Watkins is a converted winger, quickly learning the striker's craft.

      1. Kiwivillan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        He has 133 games at striker now though. LW 68 career games nearly half as much

        1. GreennRed
          • 12 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          For me Ings is currently the better goalscorer. I like Watkins, great work ethic, keen to learn and improve but not as natural a goalscorer as him.

    7. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Either way, Watkins will drift wide left and look to set up the attack rather than score himself. Ings for me.

  17. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Best pick ;

    A) Greenwood (352)
    B) Wilson (343)

    Cheers.

    1. Corn Eto'o
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Im personally feeling A. Greenwood getting missed a lot considering No cavani and No rashford right now

    2. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      If got Bruno then B imo

    3. LLoris
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A

    4. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Wilson is massively underrated here, 2nd of the 7.5s for me

      1. Ronnies
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        My issue with Wilson is Antonio and Ings are nailed in my team, if I go Wilson that's 3 very prone injury strikers!

        1. The Suspended One
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Same story for me, he’s in for 3-4-3, but I’m 352

        2. GreennRed
          • 12 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          A lot of strikers are injury prone. With more prehab and improved S&C they're becoming less injury prone and still worth a punt.

  18. southernrocker1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Midfield dilemma, help!

    A. Greenwood & Raph
    B. Jota & Benhram
    C. Barnes & Raph

    1. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      C, go for nailed’ness imo

      1. cravencottage
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This

    2. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      C

  19. MFC86
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Best defence option

    A) coufal + 4.0 (already have tsimikas)

    B) 4.5 + 4.5 (likely ayling and white)

    Thanks

    1. LLoris
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

    2. GreennRed
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      4.5 and 4.0 and 0.5 in the bank for upgrading your 11 or future transfers if they're 4th and 5th defenders?

      No point in having a 5th 4.5m defender that'll almost never play if you can improve your 11.

      1. Boxwoods
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This is good too.

      2. MFC86
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Good point mate

      3. MFC86
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Solid advice thanks

    3. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

    4. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I’m on B, as felt too risky/transfer requiring to start with two 4.0s + short term Gundo punt.

      1. MFC86
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Yeah think I’m swaying this way, thanks

    5. cravencottage
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

  20. LLoris
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    I cant decide and why?

    A) Barnes
    B) Greenwood
    C) Gundo

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A

      Rotation Risk
      Deep role

      1. LLoris
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        thats why I should have him?

        1. The Suspended One
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          No that’s b and c respectively

          1. LLoris
            • 5 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            Isnt Barnes also a rotation risk. And isnt Gundo nailed for the first month at least

            1. The Suspended One
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              Barnes is nailed when fit, maybe an injury risk but not rotation.

              Gundog got a 2m increase, lost penalties, and gets 3 games at best in a deep lying mf role while two of those games are Arsenal and Spurs. Hard pass.

              1. I Must Break You
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 5 Years
                2 years, 10 months ago

                Gundo won't play deep with KDB out

    2. Gabbiadini
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      b

    3. GreennRed
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Barnes. Nailed on. Fresh after long break. Good attacking option, lovely price.

      Greenwood gametime looks limited to a few gameweeks.

      Unclear what role Gundogan will have after transfer window.

      1. LLoris
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Is Barnes 100% nailed? Scared of that man city norwich fixture

    4. 3 A
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Close.

      C, A , B in that order.

    5. waldo666
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

  21. FPL Theorist
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Start

    A. White (bre), or
    B. Veltman (bur)?

    Have no other players in either fixture.

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Veltman for me, no chance of returns with white

    2. LLoris
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A if you have Sanchez

    3. 3 A
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B for me . Veltman can assist even from CB position. Last season he assisted Trossard from there.

    4. FPL Theorist
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Cheers all!

  22. steven8991
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Is it better to start with Havertz, save 0.5m, and change to Mahrez in GW2 or start with Mahrez from GW1 and save FT or can use the FT elsewhere?

    1. Gabbiadini
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      start with mahrez

      1. cravencottage
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This

    2. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Start with Mahrez

      Spurs are terrible

    3. LLoris
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      start with mahrez

    4. I Must Break You
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Cue Mahrez not starting this weekend

  23. zizoo10
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Finally came up with a decent draft with SON in mind. Only trade off is relying on Benrahma to “cover” Antonio

    Sanchez
    TAA • Shaw • Tsimi
    Salah • Bruno • Mahrez • Greenwood • Benrahma
    Ings • Toney

    Mahrez+Greenw > Son+Raph GW3

    1. Gabbiadini
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      just start with son and raph

      1. zizoo10
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Nah I fancy Mahrez+GW for the first 2

        1. zizoo10
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Especially Mahrez gw2

          1. Gabbiadini
            • 6 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            could be rotated.
            you're also already booking in two transfers. when you may need to be trading out Tsimikas and Ings whose fixtures swing. It's not the right play.
            That's not even considering other injuries or players who may open up as potentially must gets.

            1. zizoo10
              • 8 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              Fair point l, will have to think about that one

            2. The Suspended One
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              Why would he be rotated? Who would play on the right? This is rubbish..

      2. waldo666
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This.

        1. Gabbiadini
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          yup.

  24. JONALDINHO
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    People’s thoughts on Benrahma? Might have to get him instead of Raph as I need 0.5 shaved off my team

    1. zizoo10
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      His history ain’t great but I hear he is in the lingard role now, and had a good preseason

    2. GreennRed
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Looked good in preseason but not great attacking threat in his gametime last season. I went with Smith Rowe as 4th mid but might also be a quality footballer, but not a great FPL footballer.

    3. kobewan
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      could be golden if he keeps his pre-season form,

  25. The Suspended One
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Danny Ings…

    -more expensive than ever (check)
    -off penalties (check)
    -not playing up front (check)

    7th most owned player in the game

    1. JONALDINHO
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Who said he’s not playing up front?

      1. The Suspended One
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        His last match, his manager, Villa fans…

        1. JONALDINHO
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Sauce?

    2. kobewan
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      wait, he is not playing upfront?

      1. The Suspended One
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        10 with Watkins up front

        1. cravencottage
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          So who would you choose as strikers?

          1. The Suspended One
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            I’m just saying… would rather he was 7.5 or still on pens.. not bothered about the position jive

            1. kobewan
              • 4 Years
              2 years, 10 months ago

              Interesting

    3. Flair
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Danny Ings...

      - Watford first game (check)
      - Newcastle second game (check)
      - Brentford third game (check)
      - 34 goals and 6 assists in 57 starts last two seasons (check)
      - .39, .58, and .51 npxG+xA/90 past three seasons (check)
      - Easy swap to Bamford/Jimenez when fixtures turn (check)

      Don't have him but the ownership is there for a reason.

      1. Flair
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        *57 appearences

      2. Ibralicious
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This

    4. cravencottage
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Are you trying to talk yourself out of him or playing devil’s advocate? Above you said you choose him over Watkins.

      1. The Suspended One
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Just think it’s ironic; I’m planning on Villa being bad, but those first three fixtures…

        I’m trying to talk myself into ignoring him really..

        1. cravencottage
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          I get that. But there isn’t much to choose from up front.

          1. The Suspended One
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            2 years, 10 months ago

            If he was 7.5 he’s be the first striker I chose. That extra .5 is ugly ..

  26. Tiamani Warrior
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Is there likely to be a Buendia injury update before deadline?

    1. kobewan
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I'm sure will get an update before Saturday

    2. Ibralicious
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Only time/crystal ball will tell

  27. L'Aeroplanino
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    lukaku still not added 2 days before the deadline?

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Still not signed

    2. cravencottage
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Odd- but very few would actually have him GW1

    3. I Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Chelsea haven't officially announced him. Can't add him til then.

    4. L'Aeroplanino
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      my bad

  28. kobewan
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    with Ziyech's injury and Lukaku's signing, who gets more game time. Didn't bother to include Mount as I think he is nailed.

    A. Pulisic
    B. Werner
    C. Havertz

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      BCA

      1. kobewan
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        You think Werner would have a break-out season with having better striker with him?, somewhat took the pressure of him.

        1. The Suspended One
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          No, I think he’s absolutely essential for the system. I do think Lukaku drawing attention will help him, but he is going to have to learn how to finish or it won’t matter

  29. ZLATAN'S PONYTAIL
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Is there a reason Demarai Gray isn't being thought of as a 5.5 mid?

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      His team

  30. One Man
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Why are people so certain Gundo is going to play deep first 3 ?

    1. The Suspended One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Not sure anyone is certain or that it’s a widely held belief. I just expect jack to play the 8 which leaves him holding quite a bit. The price and no pens is the issue

    2. I Must Break You
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I don't expect Gundo to play deep