Members

FPL tools: Tips on how to best use Rate My Team for Gameweek 1 planning

There is a vast array of tools available in Fantasy Football Scout’s Premium Members Area that can help Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers with their planning ahead of the new season.

Having explored the ‘per 90’ search filter and the ‘flat-track bully’ feature previously, today we provide tips on how managers can best make use of the Rate My Team (RMT) tool.

RMT is available only with a Premium Membership – and you can get 20% off by signing up for a full year today.

Sanity Check

The RMT can help guide our team selection by supplying a Gameweek-by-Gameweek points projection for each player.

Raphinha’s point projections for the first six Gameweeks

The estimated values are an average of what we can expect. They include every possibility from the player scoring a hat-trick to being sent off or coming on as a sub.

The RMT factors in all the different ways a player can earn or lose points.

By relying on hard data it gives us a counter to the hype and excitement that can distort our perception. As former FPL winner Simon March recently explained:

Irrational exuberance causes us to rely on unreliable prospects and it prevents us from seeing what is truly in front of us.

– Simon March, How to avoid getting carried away with your GW1 picks

The RMT provides a dispassionate sounding board for our transfer dilemmas.

Bruno or Bru’NO’?

During pre-season the RMT is useful for comparing different drafts – could we really do better without Bruno Fernandes (£12.0m) in our starting XI?

In his interview last Friday, Mark omitted the Portuguese from his team:

Interestingly, despite Mark setting up his team in a 3-5-2 formation, the RMT recommends benching Brentford midfielder Bryan Mbeumo (£5.5m) in favour of defender Vladimír Coufal (£5.0m). 

It gives this 4-4-2 line-up a projected score of 60 points for Gameweek 1 and close to 345 points for opening half dozen fixtures.

Meanwhile Tom’s recent draft features three premium-priced players with Son Heung-min (£10.0m) joining Mohamed Salah (£12.5m) and Fernandes.

Over the first six matches Tom’s side is projected to score a rounded up total of 348 points, nearly three more than Mark’s “BruNO” side.

This is largely due to his three premiums sharing the captaincy:

However, despite faring worse in the medium term, Mark’s Gameweek 1 team outscores Tom’s by 60 points to 58.

The RMT highlights the different approaches between these two elite managers, especially around their attitude to transfers and captaincy. As Mark explains:

I’m getting Mané for the early period, when I think he will play, and then probably getting rid in Gameweek 3 or 4 … people saying “oh don’t book out transfers”, yeah fine but what’s the difference between planning and booking out transfers? 

… there’s nothing wrong with looking ahead and going “right, in Gameweek 3 I could do this, in Gameweek 4 I could do this” – because I do think, hopefully, this season gives us lots of options and, in a season where you’ve got lots of options, I’m hoping that it gives something to the managers who are a bit more gutsy and a bit more dynamic and fluid with their lineups.

– Mark, Team Reveal

Whereas Tom is much more cautious with his premium assets, preferring to use the majority of his transfers on mid-priced midfielders:

You don’t want to get caught out by those guys, those big hitters you’re going to captain, personally I don’t move them around too much. And it’s that position, which is a fourth midfielder slot for me, it’s just a good price point, you can have a bit of fun with it, I don’t get attached to value, you can be aggressive … I think you can get away with it because these players aren’t going to be widely captained.

– Tom, Meet the Manager

Both these managers have been very successful with their contrasting playing styles: Tom’s achieved five top 1,000 finishes to Mark’s ten top 5,000 end-of-season ranks. But, whichever approach you prefer, the RMT can evaluate your squad’s points potential.

Building a draft

To begin, select the the Rate My Team tool from the Members’ Home menu.

Then, from the dropdown, choose ‘Build My Team‘.


Finally, select your players one-by-one from the ‘Add Player’ dropdown.

FPL tools: Tips on how to use our Rate My Team tool 4


When you have a valid squad consisting of two goalkeepers, five defenders, five midfielders and three forwards, the RMT will give you weekly totals and suggest a captain, vice-captain and bench.

Once a team is built, it can be saved and shared by bookmarking the URL.

Here are the links to Mark‘s and Tom‘s teams if you want to have a tinker.

The recommended captain pick is indicated by a small ‘c‘ after the Gameweek points projection.

Vice-captain by the letter ‘v‘, and your bench in order of preference: ‘b1‘, ‘b2‘, ‘b3‘, with the letter ‘b‘ highlighting the sub-goalkeeper.


In the example above, despite Michael Obafemi (£4.5m) having a lower projected points tally than Andrew Omobamidele (£4.0m), the RMT suggests putting him ahead of the Norwich defender on the bench.

The reason for this is that Obafemi’s total is reduced because he’s not expected to play. However, in the unlikely scenario that he does feature, he’s the better pick.

Obafemi (left) is given an expected minutes (xM) of just four, this accounts for all possible minutes he’s likely to get. In the Premier League he’s averaged 26 minutes per appearance. Should he play, his underlying points projection (adjP) is better than Omobamidele (right). Rollover a player’s projected score to reveal their adjP and xM.

So the RMT thinks it’s worth putting Obafemi in the second bench spot to make use of his superior underlying points projection (‘adjP’ in the image above) should he play. Otherwise the safer option of Omobamidele will autosub in.

And your substitutes do contribute towards your estimated Gameweek score: points from your bench are calculated based on starting probabilities. The RMT works out how many players on average won’t play, and how many points you could get from your subs.

Under the Hood

The Rate My Team tool was created by Cambridge mathematics graduate Chris Atkinson (aka RMT’s Professor), who used to work for ATASS Sports, a statistical research consultancy providing modelling and analysis for the sports industry.

The RMT uses three main components to arrive at its points projections:

  • The team model
  • Player rates
  • Playing probabilities

The team model works out, among other things, the amount of goals it expects a team to score in a match. It considers the strength of a team’s attack against the quality of the opposition’s defence.

The percentage chance of a clean sheet is predicted along with details such as save points and own goal probabilities.

The RMT also considers that yellow and red cards are more likely to go to the side doing more defending.

The overarching element, the thing that’s holding it together, is our team numbers, which we think are really really good evidenced by the fact that they are so close to the betting market.

– Chris Atkinson, creator of the RMT

Within each team, player rates are assigned to every aspect of points scoring including goals, assist and bonus points.

This is determined by a player’s position on the pitch and historical performance – if they have scored lots of goals in the past the model thinks they are more likely to score goals in future.

The final aspect of the RMT asks: how likely is a player to get on the pitch?

To get the best answer to that question requires some manual input.

Human touch

Every week we come up with the short term probabilities of players starting.

Neale‘s predicted line-ups, rated the best and most reliable team predictions for FPL, are crucial for arriving at our expected minute values.

On Fantasy Football Scout’s site they go into some depth on the latest news and manager news conferences which is a clear indication of the time and attention to detail that they put into their predictions and this is paying off with their results.

– Footstock

We also tell the RMT about suspensions, injuries, and a change in penalty takers.

A lot of work goes into keeping the RMT informed of the latest developments and its predictions will inevitably be more accurate closer to the deadline.

The Assistant Manager

All this knowledge combines to make the RMT every FPL manager’s perfect assistant.

You can use it to work out defensive rotations, build Free Hit and Wildcard squads, and help you find the best value players.

Filter players and select your Gameweek range

The ‘Players‘ section of the RMT assesses all Premier League players and lists them by expected points total. Fantasy Football Scout subscribers can also choose to order by Gameweek, price or value (total points divided by price).

Filters may be applied for club, position, and price. It’s even possible to limit the range to specific Gameweeks.

Best value defenders over the opening four Gameweeks

Once the season starts, instead of having to build a team from scratch, Premium Members will be able to enter their FPL IDs to add their current squads.

When making transfers, managers will see a before and after points tally. Is that four-point hit likely to pay off?

Points estimates Before and After Transfers

Throughout the campaign, the Rate My Team tool can help you form an opinion about players and keep you grounded in reality. It might be called Fantasy football but that doesn’t mean our players are going to get double-digit hauls every week.

TopMarx Fan of Fantasy Football and Monty Python. "Archimedes out to Socrates, Socrates back to Archimedes, Archimedes out to Heraclitus, he beats Hegel. Heraclitus a little flick, here he comes on the far post, Socrates is there, Socrates heads it in! Socrates has scored! The Greeks are going mad, the Greeks are going mad! Socrates scores, got a beautiful cross from Archimedes. The Germans are disputing it. Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside. Follow them on Twitter

2,401 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Stimps
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Antonio or Gundogan?

    Have Coufal, no city

    1. billnats
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Why not both?

    2. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Gundogan

  2. One Man
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Mbeumo
    Benrahahma
    Raph
    Or Sarr for first 3/4 ?

    1. Neves say Neves
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Raph if price is no issue

    2. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Mbeumo if you can use the cash well. Short term benrahma, long term Raph.

  3. Simon69
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    I really wanted Jota but picking Tsimikas allows me to bank 1m to do Greenwood > Grealish for GW2 and Benrahma > Raphinha in GW3 or GW5. Thoughts?

    Sanchez

    TAA, Tsimikas, Shaw

    Salah, Bruno, Greenwood, Benrahma

    Ings, Antonio, Toney

    Subs: McGovern, Veltman, Brownhill, Ayling

    1. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      If the first move costs 1 million, how does it give you funds for the other transfer? Tsimikas to Amartey and Greenwood to Jota doesn't cost more than your current team?

      1. Simon69
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Guess I could have worded it differently. Instead of Jota, Amartey and Obafemi, I now have Brownhill, Tsimikas and Toney + 1m ITB to make upgrades.

      2. Simon69
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Both moves will cost 0.5m each.

    2. Neves say Neves
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      personally I'd only book in a maximum of 1 pre-planned transfer. Benrahma > raph sounds good tho

      1. Simon69
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Cheers. Like the idea of having a little bit of extra cash to make changes if necessary.

  4. OptimusBlack
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Which plan is better ?
    A- Coufal , Barnes , Obafemi (3-5-2)
    B- White - Brownhill - Ings ( 3-4-3)
    Other forwards ( Toney & Antonio)

    1. Neves say Neves
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A. vlad the lad is class

  5. billnats
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    A) TAA, Barnes, Gundogan
    B) Dias, Rafinha, Son

    1. Feed tha Sheep
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A

    2. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      a

    3. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A

  6. Naby K8a
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    How's it looking?

    Sanchez
    Shaw Dias Tsimi Digne
    Salah Bruno Mahrez
    Ings Antonio Toney

    Steele White Willock Gilmour

    1. Squib
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Looks decent

      1. Naby K8a
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Just seeing if Willock deal goes through before deadline Friday but fancy him to join by GW2.

  7. BigKeith
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Which midfield would you pick?

    A. Salah, Raph, Barnes, Bruno, 4.5
    B. Salah, Raph, Barnes, Mahrez, Greenwood
    C. Salah, Raph, Barnes, Son, Greenwood
    D. Salah, Raph, Gundo, Son, Greenwood (means dropping Ayling for a £4m def not Tsimikas)

  8. It's his Job.
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    G2G?
    Sanchez
    Cancelo Shaw Tsimikas Coufal
    Mane Salah Bruno Barnes
    Ings Toney

    Steele Amartey Gilmour Oberfami

    1. Neves say Neves
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Salah, Bruno AND Mane! Wow! Looks insanely good but I'd just be a bit worried about Cancelo's minutes especially as Leicester seem to be signing Vestergaard which ruins Amartey as an option... Could downgrade to stones and upgrade Amartey to a 4.5 (White, Veltman, Ayling)

  9. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Best 2 options from

    A Ayling
    B White
    C Veltman or Webster

    1. Ask Yourself
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      AC

    2. It's his Job.
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      A+C

    3. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I'm on A and B just because I do not want to double up because Sanchez Gk

      1. Ronnies
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        If you have Sanchez as GK, then A and B.

  10. Ask Yourself
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Anyone brave enough for a Mahrez and Gundogan double up?

    1. billnats
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I’m still trying to decide between Gundogan and Greenwood

    2. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Doesn't need bravery really, they are most attacking team in the league, almost guaranteed starters and Norwich GW2

      1. The Big Fella
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        This ^^

    3. LeSof
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I’ve been toying with my team for the past half hour to do exactly this, which is funny because I had no draft with City players until then. Here is the result:
      Watford boys
      TAA Shaw Coufal White Tsi
      Salah Bruno Mahrez Gundo Mbuemo
      Antonio Toney Fodder

      Feedback appreciated

  11. Flynny
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Evening.....1 6.5m slot up for grabs in my team.....not sure who to award it to.....

    A....toney 343

    B....raphinha 352

    C....buendia (if fit, in addition to ings) 352

    Thanks

    1. waldo666
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

    2. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Between A and B imo. A for flexibility imo

      1. Flynny
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Cheers.

    3. LeSof
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I’d go B, simply because of formation and Buendia’s uncertainty. Plus you’ll want Raph come week 4

  12. Junks
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Dele Alli.....

    Thats's all.

  13. Champions League Varane
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Thoughts?? Would love Barnes but not possible.

    Sanchez
    Tsimikas TAA Shaw Webster
    Bruno Salah Son Gundo
    Toney Ings.

    Foster,Brownhill,Ayling,Obafemi.

    1. FeverPitch
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Is this not .5 over? Like it, very similar to mine. Either go Watford and Brighton gk but double up on them rather than one from each

      1. FeverPitch
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Ah no sorry I have .5 more in defence and Antonio over Ings. Which I prefer - I have villa defence over Webster. But solid team

  14. Team of Tebilys
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Considering taking a different approach to GW1 this year given the short-term 4m options in defence. Using two 4m defs to keep money itb and give greater flexibility in transfers. Something like this:

    Sanchez (Steele)
    TAA Shaw White Tsimi (Amartey)
    Salah Bruno Grealish Barnes (Gilmour)
    Ings Antonio (Scarlett)
    2 itb

    Barring injury I should be able to field decent teams for first two GWs with 2 playing subs. Gives me time to assess the likes of Raph/Buendia/Toney/Benrahma/Harrison/Mbuena where early fixtures or prem experience currently make them a GW1 gamble.

    Never started with more than 0 itb, is this a silly move?

    Could also downgrade grealish to gundo or upgrade to Mahrez. I like the idea of 2m in the bank because any of the 6-6.5 options would be doable if one option does become standout (eg Toney scores a brace). Any comments or challenges?

  15. Pikill
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Gone a bit mad here, what do you think?

    Bachmann
    Digne Shaw Tsimi
    Bruno Mane Salah Benrahma ESR/Mbuemo
    Ings Jiminez

  16. The Royal Robin
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    A) Barnes & Toney
    B) Benrahma & Wilson

    1. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

  17. RWB_1991
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    El Ghazi or Ings on pens??

    1. The Royal Robin
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      El Ghazi for the first few apparently, then Ings takes them.

      1. FantasyHero
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        How do you know?

  18. ALegendJ
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    A fit Watkins who's playing centrally as confirmed by Dean Smith.

    Is Ings worth the extra 0.5? The extra cash can come in handy

    1. Stupendous
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Watkins for me. Agreed.

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Is Watkins fit though?

      1. ALegendJ
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Dean Smith confirmed it today

        1. Amartey Partey
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Thanks!

  19. Stupendous
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Why am I finding my drafts have either zero city, or three?

    This game would be a lot easier with no City.

    1. Stupendous
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      It's a gamble to go without and feels like a gamble to go with!

      1. Amartey Partey
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Yeah so true. I'm sticking to just the one for now. Their game against Norwich could be a rugby score though.

    2. FPL Theorist
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Not sure why you would have three. The fixtures are pretty bad. Once they get better and you have a better sense of who's in form, you can get on them.

    3. ALegendJ
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Funnily, I have been doing the same. No City, next day, Dias Gundogan Mahrez!

  20. 824545201
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    My main GW1 punt is getting Havertz in and captaining him, with the idea of getting Son right after.

    I'm not so sure about my plan after he just played 120 minutes. FFS boys and girls with a crystal ball, does he start on Saturday?

    1. Bobby Digital
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Wouldn't risk it

  21. FPL Theorist
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Who is the best 4.0 defender if you don't need one to play GW1?

    1. Stupendous
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Amartey for now

      1. Stupendous
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Although Vestergaard signing might end that

        1. FPL Theorist
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Yeah, I'm thinking of switching him to Tsimikas even though I would likely bench GW1.

          I wish someone would quantify the benefit of keeping a Liverpool spot open, but in the absence of an informative article about this, I tend to think the "blocking the triple-up" idea is over-hyped.

      2. 824545201
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Leicester getting Vestergaard though.

    2. Amartey Partey
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Tsimi
      Omo
      Amartey probably a no-go now

      1. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Changing your name?

        1. Amartey Partey
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          Haha no more partey 🙁

  22. Areid13
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Thoughts?

    Sanchez
    Trent Shaw Tsimi
    Salah Bruno Raphinha Barnes Mbuemo
    Bamford Antonio

    McGovern Deeney Coufal White

  23. AD105
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    G2G?

    Only one I want who I haven’t got is Son but you can’t have them all - have 0.5 ITB still

    Sanchez
    TAA Shaw Tsimikas
    Salah Bruno Barnes Raphinha
    Ings Antonio Toney

    Foster Coufal White Gilmour

  24. thepuntmaster
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    So everyone is on Sanchez… no one tempted by Meisler or Pickford for the extra 0.5?

    1. Bushwhacker
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I'm on Pickford ; don't like Meisler fixtures and their shaky defense.

    2. Hazz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      I was tempted by both:
      - Pickford, temporarily, but looked shakey as did Everton
      - Meslier yes, but opening fixtures. Can see a mater move or wildcard to get him.

    3. Emiliano Sala
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Emiliano

  25. Hazz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Zaha & Cucho vs. Brownhill & Toney (+1 mil)

    It should be an easy decision but just have that feeling about Wilf!

    1. pingissimus
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Bizarrely he's in my current draft if I go aggressive - despite all my qualms about Palace

      Pens tied on for the foreseeable. Minutes too. Brentford is the type of defence he eats for breakfast. Looked at over the two weeks he's an equal choice to Toney

      But see below

  26. pingissimus
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Have read elsewhere that Wolves will be playing with a high line..

    Can anyone confirm the likelihood of this please?

    If so then both Barnes and Son become increasingly interesting as early picks in weeks 1 and 2.

    1. Hazz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Whether they play a high line or not, their defense have been pathetic in pre-season.

  27. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Best combination;

    A) Raphinha + Wilson

    B) Greenwood + Toney

    Cheers.

    1. The Finnisher
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      B

    2. Tcheco
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      b

  28. Emiliano Sala
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Most probable gametime for 4.0 else than amartey and tsimikas?
    Omibamidele?
    Livromanto?
    Someone else?

    1. FPL Theorist
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 10 months ago

      Omo short-term.

      Livramento seems like he could be somewhat like a Ferguson. Although not injured, I prefer a bird in the hand -- someone who is getting starts now.

      1. Emiliano Sala
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 10 months ago

        Is omo nailed short term?

        1. FPL Theorist
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 10 months ago

          As long as others are injured. Not sure how long that is.

  29. The Finnisher
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    Last 2 MF spots are all I'm debating now

    Salah - Bruno - ? ? - 4.5
    Toney Antonio Ings

    A. Mahrez & Raphinha
    B. Son & ESR
    C. Gundogan & Greenwood + 0.5

  30. Emiliano Sala
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 10 months ago

    I suggested others not to plan their transfers
    Now I am doing that
    Lol
    Greenwood to grealish for gw2