FPL

FPL managers to get extra Free Hit chip from Gameweek 20: Initial reaction

Fantasy Premier League (FPL) have revealed that managers will be given an extra Free Hit (FH) chip from Gameweek 20 onwards. 

The announcement is a reaction to a chaotic last few weeks in which Covid-19 has severely disrupted the football programme, with 10 Premier League fixtures falling prey to the pandemic.

A hastily arranged Double Gameweek 22 (and possibly a Double Gameweek 21, as well) is expected, following Tuesday’s news about FA Cup replays being shelved to accommodate the fixture backlog.

Managers who have not played their Free Hit ahead of Gameweek 20 will not lose their first chip and instead have two available to them.

Free Hits are unable to use in consecutive Gameweeks, however: after the chip is activated, your squad will return to its previous state for the following Gameweek.

READ MORE: Our beginner’s guide to chips and Blank/Double Gameweeks

WHEN TO USE THE EXTRA FREE HIT CHIP?

Thoughts will immediately turn to the much-touted Double Gameweek 22 which, lest we forget, hasn’t actually been confirmed yet.

With 13 Premier League fixtures outstanding (another three have been called off due to a clash with the FIFA Club World Cup or inclement weather), however, the abandonment of the FA Cup replays is effectively as good as confirmation that it will happen.

While we haven’t yet seen the additional fixtures for Double Gameweek 22, playing a Free Hit then will also mean that the decision on whether or not to sell Mohamed Salah (£13.1m) may be made easier. FPL’s leading points-scorer will miss (at least) Gameweeks 22 and 23 while he is representing Egypt at the Africa Cup of Nations, so deploying a Free Hit in the former would mean that he need only be benched in one Gameweek before his return from Cameroon. That, of course, is under the assumption that he doesn’t miss more domestic action at a pre-tournament training camp.

Blank Gameweek 30 will also likely be a popular target for one of the Free Hit chips: there is a clash with the FA Cup quarter-finals that weekend, with no possible chance of postponed fixtures being moved to the following Gameweek as an international break then takes place.

THE FFSCOUT COMMUNITY’S INITIAL REACTION

“Guessing 90% of active managers will be on FH in GW22 now and saving the other for later in the season.” – Revival

“I’ve been on a Free Hit 21/Wildcard (WC) 22 plan for a while.

“This just seals it. FH and Bench Boost (BB) for the major Double Gameweeks (DGWs) from cups, Triple Captain (TC) in the minor DGWs for the likes of Liverpool, City, Son and Chelsea wing-backs.” – Ze_Austin

“Makes sense to go for GW22 if that’s the big DGW. Although sure more thought is needed… could an early WC and BB in 22 be the way to go and use two FHs for the doubles later in the season?” – Pat Bonner

“Clearly good to have extra FH but wondering now how best to use first WC in GW20: whether to set the team up for 22 with an eye on future fixtures (if it’s a double) and have two FHs to use later in the season or set up for longer period post-22 and use FH in 22.” – dunas_dog

“It’s just making the game easier for people who don’t plan. That’s two DGWs handed to everyone on a plate.” – Wild Rover

“Not sure what to feel about this news. I have been badly burned with player no-shows over recent weeks and have been carefully prepping my squad to maximise potential DGWs. All that planning seems a waste now with a 2nd free hit being announced and I feel disadvantaged. Rules should not change mid-season” – MrBadger

“I think it merits discussion: the case for the extra FH actually *helping* those managers who have not already used theirs. The argument hinges on three points:

– Many of the high-scoring players from BGW18 were highly owned anyway. I would argue that there was not much advantage from playing it creatively, it only made sense to play it to make up the numbers, meaning using a hit to put out a template-y team that some managers were lucky enough to be able to field with a FT or a -4. So a lot of managers have played a FH to break even.

– We are almost certain to have more than one DGW between now and the end of the season, especially if more games get postponed. We may get triple GWs. There will also likely be Blank Gameweeks which could hurt more than BGW18. Arsenal, Liverpool and City played in the BGW, what if we had a BGW with not many owned players?

– Extra FHs mean that BGWs and DGWs are less likely to have to be factored into second-half wildcards. This means that those who have not played their FH will be better able to wildcard into teams which will see them through the standard Gameweeks in between blanks and doubles.

Following on from this, then, those with two FHs left have, potentially, more points to play for than those who have already played FH, as long as the possible gains from the future outweigh the average gain from playing FH in GW18 (and I think they do).” – Make Arrows Green Again

VOTE IN OUR POLL

403 Comments Post a Comment
  1. VaVaVoom14
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    1 free transfer 22k in the world. Thinking rowe to Martinelli or Alonso to davies. What do we reckon?

    Ramsdale
    Trent Cancelo James Alonso
    Salah(c) Jota Foden Bernardo Rowe
    Lacazette

    (Steele Cash King Scarlett)

    1. Pedersen
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      My team is much like yours and i am considering Rowe to Son and Alonso to Dalot

  2. Ëð
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    What is the plan for WC1 now if we still have it? Await further news on DGW21/22?

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      I think the play may be to WC this week and use transfers to build BB side for 22, WC 23/4 and keep 2 free hits until later in season

  3. markus808
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    What do I do with my WC1 and 2 free transfers? Kind a lost here. Anyone figured it out?

    1. Scholes Out For Summer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Use FTs this week, WC next week, FH or BB 22

    2. Black Knights
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Get on with it!

  4. MC Hammer
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    An extra WC would have been more useful than the extra FH. Fixing your team for one week is not really enough to deal with so many cancellations and player absences.

    1. Pedersen
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Not getting anything would have been better cause then no one could complain or be greedy like this

      1. Black Knights
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah beginning to think this. Whingeing for whingeing’s sake.

      2. MC Hammer
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 4 months ago

        Perhaps

    2. markus808
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      I would have liked +10 points for anyone in top 100k more, than this extra FH tbh.

  5. bitm2007
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    If you knew a second FH was on the way would you have used one in GW18 ?

    I probably would have done, my 9 included Bernardo Silva, Jota, James and Son who were all rumoured to be not starting, but I ended up scoring just 3 points less than the Scout Picks (66 points) and have a better team for this GW thanks to using my FT. So it would probably have been a mistake.

    1. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Nope. I was able to field 11 (Foden included, but 10 with hindsight) and my team looked ok.

  6. jay01
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    For gwk22, would you still have TAA and Jota against Brentford? (Even in a freehit)

    1. Scholes Out For Summer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      yeah most likely

  7. DeadStarComing
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    The extra FH is unusual, but these are unusual circumstances in football. They obviously think there’s likely to be more disruption with postponements and rushed DGWs. At least FPL has adapted to give people a reason to stay engaged. I don’t really understand how some can feel disadvantaged by this. We’re all getting it and you can’t have planned anything up to this point because we don’t even know what’s to come.

    1. MC Hammer
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Exactly, they had to do something to help us out. You can’t have a game week with 4 games or games cancelled at the last minute.

      1. No Professionals
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 4 months ago

        but it's the same for everyone.

        didn't care if they did something or didn't.

        1. DeadStarComing
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 4 months ago

          The problem for me is on an individual game week with postponements it’s not actually the same for everyone. Some managers lose more players than others. The free hit might give those badly affected a way out. I’m sure if this had come last week a lot would have used it previous game week.

  8. Cheeky Onion
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    1 FT & 2.0m ITB - will roll FT this week
    De Gea
    TAA - Cancelo - James*
    Salah* - Bilva* - Foden* - Mount* - Bowen
    Dennis* - Watkins

    Bachmann - Targett - White - Locaida

    Transfers I'm *planning* to make by GW21/22:
    James > Lamptey
    Mount > Jota/Tielemans
    Salah > Son
    Foden/Bilva > Jota/Tielemans
    Dennis > CR7

    Decent moves assuming DGW(s)?

  9. circusmonkey
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    Generally not in favour of extra help to placate the masses, nor of the rule changes.

  10. Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    These cancellations have been tough, hopefully next week they can give everybody 100 extra pts...

  11. MC Hammer
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    More useful and exciting would be if they removed the 3players per team limit, allows us to deal with cancelled games better

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      There'd probably be 1m+ transfers for Tsimikas if so.

  12. markus808
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    I think it is good for casuals, in the end everyone should be happy, but OGs could probably gain even more when playing it smart. So fair play imho.

  13. markus808
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    Martinelli or Bowen for only GW 19?

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      The in-form player in the in-form team.

      1. markus808
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 4 months ago

        With disciplinary issues or no?

  14. Planet Head
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    Totally can't make the rules up as you go along, that's why I turned casual the moment they added new GWs the season before last. Ruined the integrity of the game

    1. Dennis System
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 4 months ago

      Its a game

  15. Oldie99
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    I don’t love that Alonso started tonight, but are there other reasons as to why people are transferring him out now?

  16. Jerse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    Silly remark by WildRover and only to be expected from one the FPL Superior types who look down on the more so called "casual" player. If he/she is so good two free hits will be of more value to him/ her than the much maligned "casual". Grow a pair and play what is front of you as it is the same opportunity for everyone.

  17. brianutd-why always we? 20
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    Liv and Wolves offfffff 26/12

  18. The-Red-1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 4 months ago

    How does one change their profile pic?