FPL Question Time – Consult our panel ahead of Blank Gameweek 31

Have same value tied up in Aguero.. Considering Higuien and getting aguero back on FH and then WC.

If Rashford drops .1 you only have a net loss of .2 on his value so no reason to hold him just because of that. Also, with Lukaku back in the team the need for Rashford to carry the team how he has previously has been lessened. Think he's a little dip in form as a result of this so I wouldn't be holding purely because of .2.

Aguero and Rashford are expendable but all depends on your plans too.

It is not too much for Rashford and Aguero. If you sell them before they drop again you can buy them back with 0.2 difference after their drop. It is huge for Jimenez, keep him if you can.

No.

I'd keep Jimenez and get rid of someone else personally.

Would do the Doherty replacement. That 0.6 will be immensely valuable FH 32- it’s so tight with money

Need a bournemouth attacker in there

(C)

Depends on the rest of your team.. i can see Fraser doing well this week though

Barnes for me

scratch option C lol..

Well said.

You must get a discount if you are staying here though? http://www.hoteljimenez.com/

It still matters to me as I want to FH in 32, so if I sell Jiminez and Aguero now I'll lose about 0.5m value on them when I'd probably just want them back in my FH next week, meaning I'd have less funds with which to put together my FH team

My team value is 102. I let go a long time ago.

agree ..but there is a caveat with the DGW and FH chip. I'm tempted to get rid off Jimmy and Doherty with nearly 1m value between them for 31 but I will want them both back for dgw 32 on my FH .keeping both or one of them now means I have more money to spend on united assets

haha... couldn't agree more. I'm currently keeping Jimenez but I can get a strong 11 for next week without having to sell. Having 11m+ tied up in City assets or even the 9m in Pogba isn't doing anything on the bench for 2 weeks.

exactly...but if you going to buy them back.. then it might be better to not sell

The irony is though people would have celebrated these price rises, which now mean nothing other than they can't sell players they want to 😆

What I find strange is the argument (Joe for example on the Scoutcast) that the extra 0.5 or 0.8 million you get by benching Pogba and Jiménez in the blanks will be of such a help in getting a FH team in DGW32, but then ignore the fact that you can likewise get a much better BGW31 & 33 team with the extra 5.0 million (over the base 4.5 million player value) you get by selling them for 31/33 and then buying back in 32.

It’s a player upgrade of 0.5 million in 32 v 5.0 million in 31/33 ... and then if you are not even fielding 11 starters in 31 ... mmm ...

They will be letting go though ... of .2 million per player this gameweek in price drops anyway 😉

It matters and it doesn't. It's team dependant and plan dependant. people will have success and failure with largely different ways of papproaching this.

B with Hazard possible?

B

Just A for me.
10 players with no hits is good enough.
Bednarek plays in 33 so can't justify the hit with the 2 games rule.

B with Wilson

There's still a valid case against saying such sentence.

I’d say so.

I like my transfers how I like my wine.

D for me, A if you want to keep the 4 points.

Doherty out.

Hmmm... I'd say AWB the priority, followed by Doherty. See the dilemma though.

Wondering if Doh is gonna play both games in the DGW following recent rests.

Pogba

Depends on value tied up in said players and if you'll want any of them for FH32. They have to avg 4 points+ to make the final transfer worthwhile and I think all except Maddison will. So maybe just do a -12 and ignore Maddison.

We're around the same rank and in all honesty all of those moves will benefit you in the coming week so I would say where you're not risking dropping out of a top 100k and have ground to make I'd say why not since a lot of people will be taking at least -4/-8.

That said, it depends on what chips you have left - if you have all of them then I'd say go for it. You could also play FH this week if you only have 6 players - that might be a better strategy. FH works if you have 7-9 players this week, with only 6 maybe it's worth considering FH as you'll have 3 DGW players from that lot straight off the bat next week.

All hits are effectively -2 if you haven't yet got a full team (i.e get 2pts for starting). So do the points projection for each and judge whether they are likely to get an additional 2pts.

Also depends if you want pretty much exactly the same team as everyone else this week and GW33.

All except Maddison

Both look good. I might go with B.

B

interesting, see my comment below haha

I have some negative differentials: Schindler, Clyne, Yedlin 😮

I've just listened to the Scoutcast and Joe was on about the CHE defensive double up. I don't like that at all away to Everton and can see EVE scoring. Maybe just do the one?

Won't you need Emerson in GW33 too? Could be Alonso's turn then

i'd love that 🙂

I'd be over the moon if TAA and Salah were rested against Fulham, would feel like having a 100 pointer!

They’ll be showing 0 transfers. Dunno about value. I’d assume that’d be for the old team “behind scenes”

When are you using FH/WC then? Playing with the idea too.

yeah...will costs a few hits.
I'm taking a -4 to field 8 man in 31. Then another hit to field a full DGW32 team with TC.

Both are not related to each other?

none really, if forced, A

The clue is in (hud h) and if just for 31 def b) for me despite it being WHU haha! Huds are garbage!

A - assuming you are thinking about 33 as well.

A, assuming you need them for 31 and 33

TAA feels like a trap.

that will give you
2
2;0;6

lol

difficult choice, as they are great options. You are however taking a -8 to bring in players lots of people already own