468 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Knights Template
    • 12 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Tis mine idea remember!

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I deny thine idea!

    2. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 10 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      You're on fire. Have another Savvy B and try again.

      1. The Knights Template
        • 12 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        See below, the both of you.

  2. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Whats the latest with Cunha?

    Should I do Cunha > Isak regardless of what happens to catch Isak's rise?

    Y or N

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I think Cunha will play for reasons detailed on the previous page.

      Isak is quality though and I would myself yes.

    2. Mom, Butters just gave me a…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I don't want Cunha anymore.

      His behaviour was ridiculous.

      1. _Greg
        • 15 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Nobody does after the Leicester game. Leicester are probably the best team to play again at the moment though.

  3. _Greg
    • 15 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    I've got to the stage where I'm happy with my team until Konate is back fit basically. Feels quite boring but just gonna start saving transfers now finally. you're gonna want 5 transfers before gwk24 ideally so you can maximise the assistant manager chip to it's fullest potential when the opportunity arises. I say all five transfers because I think you'll want to afford your 0.5-1.5 manager that week, rather than leaving funds say now to save for it, it's not the best use.

  4. The Knights Template
    • 12 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    At the half-way mark of the season, GW19, any team below 10pts on the ladder would be declared execrable and immediately relegated to the Championship! The leading team in the Championship would be promoted, in time for the January transfer window. This rids the grand tourney of horrid, unwatchable rubbish and injects some new interest in proceedings. The promoted team is guaranteed survival into the next season, but if they’re below 10pts by GW19, they’re out out out! Thoughts?

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Are you in favour of the European Super League as well? Fantasy Football would be quite unique without Chelsea Arsenal City Liverpool Spurs Newcastle Villa and Man Utd.

      1. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Would that really be a Superleague? Villa and Spurs lol. No City. No Celtic either btw.

        1. BUZZBOMB ♡
          • 10 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Sorry. Thought you meant Leicester City....

          1. Mom, Butters just gave me a…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 4 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Bristol City he meant.

            1. BUZZBOMB ♡
              • 10 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Could be no Spurs and then NL could be represented by Arsenal City?

          2. _Greg
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Ha. I'd probably say those are the current 8 biggest clubs. Forest could have an argument, Leeds even Derby won a European Cup.

            1. BUZZBOMB ♡
              • 10 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Should England even get 8 clubs in a Superleague?

              1. _Greg
                • 15 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                I think that's a valid argument. No in my opinion. But...the richest will win.

                1. BUZZBOMB ♡
                  • 10 Years
                  11 months, 21 days ago

                  I wouldnt say richest should be the base point. That depends on current revenue streams. Size of club, hence my Celtic jibe. Massive if allowed the same starting blocks. Would you want any French teams? Portugese? Anything East of Germany? Just can't see how it would work properly.

                  1. _Greg
                    • 15 Years
                    11 months, 21 days ago

                    We know that provisionally the last time United City Liverpool Arsenal Chelsea and Spurs were in. Now I think Villa and Newcastle would also be included, based on Newcastle getting taken over and Villa Champs League.

                    Celtic and Rangers should both be in it, they're in Scotland though.

                    1. BUZZBOMB ♡
                      • 10 Years
                      11 months, 21 days ago

                      Does that preclude them from a European Superleague? Travelled home from Canterbury to the Borders yesterday and Im sure the visa requirements were quite informal.

                      Would both Celtic and Rangers not bring something more than Villa?

                      1. _Greg
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        I think so definitely. I would just have two from each country myself. Liverpool and Man Utd from England.

                      2. BUZZBOMB ♡
                        • 10 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        Notwithstanding my thoughts about the size of the club should be the base point, the other 12 clubs currently above MUFC in the EPL might have something to say about that.

                        Now you'll tell me you'll be top 4 by Easter.

                      3. _Greg
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        Man Utd? I very much doubt it. 5th is possible.

    2. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 10 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Too complicated and impractical. Why not just play where the pitch can be tilted by 25° in favour of the team lower in the table?

      1. The Knights Template
        • 12 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Or two players from the stronger side have to play for the weaker side, 13 v 9!

    3. snow pea in repose
      • 5 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Would there be enough time for the promoted cities/stadiums to be prepared? Law enforcement, public transit schedules, stadiums up to code, etc.

      1. The Knights Template
        • 12 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        I’m delegating logistics to you, you’re all over this stuff!

        1. snow pea in repose
          • 5 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          All relevant cities reporting ready should your ingenious plan come to pass

      2. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Milton Keynes can. That city can do anything.

        Shouldnt just be from Championship. Any league.

        Cool. From next Thursday, MK Dons will replace Southanpton and play Brentford on 4th January.

        1. The Knights Template
          • 12 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          That’s what we need, a can do attitude!

  5. Under my Cucurella
    • 10 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    A: Rogers > Amad/Iwobi
    B: Greaves > Hall/Robinson
    C: Roll FT
    D: Any paths to Isak I'm missing?

    Fab
    Gab Timber TAA
    Salah Palmer Saka Enzo
    Jackson Pedro Cunha

    Flekken Rogers Greaves RAN

    1FT 1.1ITB

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      it's probably Trent and Cunha out to Robinson and Isak, Andersen if fit worth saving 0.6 then sell RAN to Huijsen for the excellent rotation. Next free transfer get Munoz for Greaves.

      1. Under my Cucurella
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Thanks, I hadn't thought of getting rid of TAA, as only got him in last GW and for Gvardiol so hasn't had a pay off yet

    2. David Parkinson
      • 3 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I would lose RAN for Robinson and leave Greaves be for now.

      1. Under my Cucurella
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Why RAN before Greaves? Is it the bigger value? I know he is not a good asset for many reasons right now, but my thinking was at least he plays, whereas Greaves is just a permanent 0 pointer on the bench

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          it's mostly value but it's also because you can still make a profit on him probably before he loses it all. what was your PP purchase price as derailed by the list view in the transfers tab?

          1. Under my Cucurella
            • 10 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            4.4, so yeah still 0.2 profit

            1. _Greg
              • 15 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              I'd be taking that 0.2 and saying thank you very much, straight to 4.2m Andersen, who Silva will tell us he's fit and available to play in the press conference.

        2. David Parkinson
          • 3 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          RAN will become a problem soon enough (on top of the current problem) so best sort him now. Greaves is 5th so can be left alone for the time being. The advantage with doing that is he could still see a possible return to the first team.

          1. Under my Cucurella
            • 10 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Good point. So B with RAN to Robinson for you with the above team and Just ignore Isak for now and hope Cunha starts?

            1. David Parkinson
              • 3 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Yes, Cunha to Wood when banned.

              1. Under my Cucurella
                • 10 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                Good shout, appreciate the help

  6. andre_c
    • 7 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Wildcard here? Back to back red arrows, need to change something.
    Have to use WC either this week or next. Will use it to clean up defence/keepers/attackers.

    Team is:

    Henderson - Slicker
    Gabriel - RAN* - Kerkez - Robinson - Barco*
    Salah - Palmer - Saka - Eze - Rogers
    Havertz - Jackson - Joao Pedro

    1FT - 0.2ITB

    Thoughts?

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Not true. You can WC in gw19.

      Save till 19 now your team is fine. What if suddenly Salah Saka or Palmer gets injured in gwk18? You'll be able to WC Haaland straight in.

      1. andre_c
        • 7 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Ah I thought I had to use before gw19... So I guess its good to hold in the case Haaland becomes a proper option in 19.
        So should I transfer in players that are good for the next 2?

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          I would sell Havertz and Eze for Isak and Amad myself. But realistically you could save transfer this week and do it next week for free.

          1. andre_c
            • 7 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Yeah I might look at that, kept Havertz for so long he's been so disappointing. Wouldn't be surprised if he returns as soon as I sell...

            1. _Greg
              • 15 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              I would save your transfer. He probably does score this week old Havertz. Jesus scoring a hatty will wake him up a bit.

    2. David Parkinson
      • 3 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I think this is on the cusp. Havertz, Eze, Rogers, RAN, Barco, Slicker, that 6? Yep, see what you can do by removing those 6.

      1. _Greg
        • 15 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        the team he'd select this week though isn't any worse than any other teams.

        1. David Parkinson
          • 3 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          I'm suggesting removing the 6 on the transfer page to see if a combination is appealing enough to warrant a WC.
          You see Isak, Amad, Enzo, Timber, Andersen & Fabianski look on, a massive improvement.

          1. _Greg
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            I agree he could have an objectively better team but also that he could benefit with a fixtures swing or unfortunate circumstances to injuries of big assets.

  7. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Think playing Rogers v MCi might pay off?

    What are your thoughts?

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Absolutely. I said on the last page City are poor in translation and that's basically Rogers' biggest strength is his ball carrying.

      1. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Translation as in Etihad = United?

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          transition. I'm typing fast on my phone, my apologies.

        2. Benedict_Alexander_Arnold
          • 1 Year
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Lost in Transition was a great film

          1. _Greg
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Oooh the lovely young Scarlett Johansson.

            1. Benedict_Alexander_Arnold
              • 1 Year
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Exquisite!

            2. Benedict_Alexander_Arnold
              • 1 Year
              11 months, 21 days ago

              She’s fine like wine!

              1. _Greg
                • 15 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                :mrgreen:

    2. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 10 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Ive got him first sub. Leaving it in the lap of the FPL Gods.

    3. Bartowski
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Depends who drops to the bench.

      1. the dom 1
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Johnson v LIV

        1. Bartowski
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Then sure, Johnson might be benched but the cup game tmw/today will probably go some way to evidencing that.

  8. jernej93
    • 11 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Gabriel or Robinson for this GW?

    1. Bartowski
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Both.

    2. David Parkinson
      • 3 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      For one week only? I might go for Robinson but the sensible move is Gabriel before he rises in 40 minutes.

      1. jernej93
        • 11 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        I can only bring one this GW and the other one next GW or later. I am thinking Robinson for SOU (H) and than Gabriel next week?

    3. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Gabriel is the best defender in the game.

  9. Bartowski
    • 15 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Guys there's not going to be a deal with regards to Cunha's ban. The PL will have set guidelines in place that they have to be seen to adhere to for all teams. That includes Leicester and the idea that they will just let him play as part of a weird deal with Wolves. In that scenario, Leicester would have grounds to complain.

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Nah, They've changed him with misconduct, they haven't yet decided on a ban, fine, length of ban, nothing. Could they make that decision on Friday? Maybe.

      The reason I think they will do Wolves a favour is all the VAR bad luck they suffered last season.

      1. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Ban him. He said Jehova too many times.

        Ah feck. Jehova. There I did it again...

      2. Bartowski
        • 15 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        All of those things will be set out in the guidelines already so that they can ensure they react to similar situations in the same manner.

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          I can guarantee if they appeal he will play against Leicester. the appeal wouldn't take place until next week.

        2. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          they have until 23:59 to appeal on Thursday.

          1. Bartowski
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            What grounds would they even appeal on? The video is pretty clear cut.

            1. Waylander
              • 9 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              They can just make up anything they like e.g. Cunha was antagonised by the Ipswich staff member cursing his family members.

            2. _Greg
              • 15 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Well they would if they thought he could help them get three points vs Leicester before that horrendous run of fixtures. It's inconsequential if they won if that guaranteed him playing that game.

    2. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      If Wolves appeal there's precedent for the FA to allow the player to play in the games until the appeal is reviewed. It happened with other players this season already. We will have to wait and see.

      1. Bartowski
        • 15 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        The post was in relation to comments people have made that an informal deal will take place not with regards to an appeal being made.

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Yes but you aren't familiar with the process it seems.

          1. _Greg
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            it's either that or your trying to push your own narrative which justifies your decisions, which shouldn't be the basis to influence others.

            I previously speculated the PL may be frank with Wolves, tell them not to appeal but be lax announcing their verdict based on historical grievances Wolves have raised based on their VAR treatment last season. The FA can do as they please in this case and Wolves will consider that before appealing and subsequently losing the appeal to guarantee Cunha's involvement in a game which could have massive ramifications for their place in the league next season.

            1. Bartowski
              • 15 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              I mean the fact that you think Wolves VAR grievances would be taken into account Is frankly ridiculous. And as I tried to point out their guidelines would mean they had be fair to all parties, including Leicester, and be consistent with decisions.

              Nothing I've said is based on bias and anyone who works in a similar setting would understand what I'm saying.

              1. _Greg
                • 15 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                I think you think the FA are a serious organisation who take rational logical actions.

                1. rainy
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 10 Years
                  11 months, 21 days ago

                  It's all lost in transition at this stage

                  1. _Greg
                    • 15 Years
                    11 months, 21 days ago

                    :mrgreen:

                  2. _Greg
                    • 15 Years
                    11 months, 21 days ago

                    Are you ready with your price changes finger of have you ceded responsibility to that Tony fella who has a high opinion of himself based on his username?

                    Also a penchant for certain sexual acts.

                    1. rainy
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 10 Years
                      10 months, 20 days ago

                      Nah he just randomly posts them

          2. Bartowski
            • 15 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            I understand the process of an appeal being made. Others don't appear to understand how guidelines would already be in place or that informal deals wouldn't be bandied about like it's a terrible TV show.

            1. _Greg
              • 15 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              You're infering that should Wolves decide not to appeal then the decision will be made in a specific timeframe, e.g the following day.

              Historically I can't point to any examples but I do know there has been longer times than others reaching a decision after being charged. That's just how I remember it, based on paying attention to such matters since 1994.

              Bottom line is the FA will have told Wolves what's going on and Wolves will know if they should appeal or not.

              Based on Cunha's importance and such is the length of the poor fixtures the only conclusion I can draw is Cunha will play against Leicester.

              1. Bartowski
                • 15 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                No the FA isn't telling Wolves 'what's going on.' They can't show that bias. They will have sent a specific letter setting out the charges and await a response. They will already have decided the length of ban etc set on precedent. I would expect that if Wolves don't appeal then the ban would be for this weekend unless their set guidelines give a longer timeframe that Leicester can''t make their own complaint against.

                1. _Greg
                  • 15 Years
                  11 months, 21 days ago

                  The appeal wouldn't be held the following day on a Friday. then it's the weekend. So he'd play.

                  1. Bartowski
                    • 15 Years
                    11 months, 21 days ago

                    The post you just wrote that I replied to was about Wolves not appealing.

                    1. _Greg
                      • 15 Years
                      11 months, 21 days ago

                      Yes I think the FA would tell them if they need to appeal or not if they want Cunha for Leicester. Either way he's playing.

                      Just out of interest...do you own Cunha or have you owned him recently?

                      I sold him for a hit last week myself for Isak, I wanted to get Isak for 8.5m before he rockets up. I wanted to keep him last week, it's just Isak is way more important long term.

                      1. Bartowski
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        Wolves won't need the FA to tell them that, they will have their own personnel that are familiar with the regulations and as I've tried to point out the FA can't do that due to it showing bias.

                        I have Cunha in three out of four fantasy games. My input here isn't based on my own bias but rather trying to eliminate the possibilities in relation to his ban being proceeded with.

                        If they don't appeal the possibility of him playing isn't definitive at all due to everything already being in place for the length etc. That could certainly be done immediately.

                      2. _Greg
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        They are all in the loop.

                        What do you think might happen?

                      3. Bartowski
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        A spurious appeal comes down to if Wolves think they can only beat Leicester with Cunha or believe he would be more valuable against tougher opposition.

                      4. _Greg
                        • 15 Years
                        11 months, 21 days ago

                        Yes. I agree. I suspect they will choose to appeal or won't and the decision arrives magically after the Leicester game.

    3. FFS ManU
      • 3 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      I agree, there's no way that any sort of deal will be done between the PL and Wolves. The point that people are making about an appeal possibly delaying a ban is valid, but I can't remember the last time that it happened for a clear case of violent conduct.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 13 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Well, there's a case for appeal right there. Wolves can argue it wasn't 'violent' - nobody got hurt.

        1. Casual Player
          • 5 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Haha violence = hurt

          1. Casual Player
            • 5 Years
            11 months, 21 days ago

            Appeal dismissed (by me)

            1. Andy_Social
              • 13 Years
              11 months, 21 days ago

              Dismiss away, but via due process.
              My only position here is as a Cunha owner, who always intended to sell him off immediately after the Leicester game anyway.

              1. _Greg
                • 15 Years
                11 months, 21 days ago

                Everyone is desperate to sell him! After Leicester. Before he was banned the mass exodus was guaranteed regardless.

                1. Andy_Social
                  • 13 Years
                  11 months, 21 days ago

                  Yeah, I have the exact money for my plans so I'm monitoring predicted changes. I'll move as early as I can after the game.

  10. rainy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 10 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Price Changes 19th December

    Rise: Gabriel 6.2

    No falls

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      The chaos will reign tomorrow!

      1. rainy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Signs point to yes 😉

    2. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      1-0 but keeping the identity to myself today 😉
      Cheers Rainy

      1. rainy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Poker > Chess ?

    3. Casual Player
      • 5 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Thanks. Missed the price changes time and thankfully missed all the price change too

      1. _Greg
        • 15 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Yes nothing was entirely pressing unless you were planning on acquiring Gabriel the mighty London Angel of Power.

    4. Timanfaya
      • 2 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Cheers Rainy.

  11. SpaceCadet
    • 11 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Start rogers or semenyo?

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Wait on Bournemouth presser to see if Semenyo is recovered from his tight hamstring. Some are suggesting Rogers will find some joy against Man City's porous midfield at Villa Park.

      1. Casual Player
        • 5 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        I'm leaning Rogers

        1. Normally you'd take the guy not playing Man City, but these aren't normal times
        2. Semenyo feels like a good player who doesn't deliver for fantasy.

        1. SpaceCadet
          • 11 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Cheers

    2. swervinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Semenyo

  12. Artemis Titans
    • 10 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Raya (Fab)
    Hall, VdB, Dunk (Ned,Greaves)
    Salah(c), Palmer, Saka, Amad, Enzo
    Haaland, Jackson (Lanks)
    0.2itb 1ft
    Dunk to Milenkovic or roll ft? What do you think peeps? 🙂

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Roll

      1. Artemis Titans
        • 10 Years
        11 months, 21 days ago

        Think I need to do Ned to some playing def cover. Faes or equivalent crap. VdB is flagged and no cover.

        1. Holmes
          • 12 Years
          11 months, 21 days ago

          Greaves to Andersen(if fit)

  13. veni
    • 4 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Bench one :
    A) Strand Larsen
    B) Raul Jimenez
    C) Jackson

    Thanks in advance.

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      A

    2. swervinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      Prob A

  14. swervinho
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    1. Rogers to Ahmad BOU (bench Pedro whm )
    or
    2. Ait Nouri to Robinson SOU (bench Davis NEW)
    or
    3. Roll the transfer (play Pedro and Davis )

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      11 months, 21 days ago

      3. Last opportunity to play Davis.

  15. Jet5605
    • 11 Years
    11 months, 21 days ago

    Two WC combos to consider. Also, would you keep Timber on a WC after him playing the full 90 last night?

    1. Allison & Raul
    2. Henderson & Wood

    A - Milenkovic & Andersen
    B - Robinson & Burgess

    XXX - Fab
    Gabriel - Timber - Munoz - 4th - 5th
    Salah - Saka - Palmer - Amad - Enzo
    Isak -YYY - Jackson